Design and A. C. Loss Considerations for the 60 mm Dipole Magnet in the High Energy Booster
The baseline design for the SSC High Energy Booster (HEB) has dipole bending magnets with a 50 mm aperture. A recent dynamic aperture study for the High Energy Booster (HEB) suggests that an increased aperture dipole magnet (DM) is desirable. Two cost neutral options for a 60 mm aperture HEBDM design are investigated. Field transfer function, field harmonics, and relative cost impact for these designs are presented. An analysis of the cryogenic heat load due to A. C. Losses generated in the HEB ramp cycle are also reported. Included in this analysis are losses from superconductor hysteresis, yoke hysteresis, strand eddy currents, and cable eddy currents. The A. C. Loss impact of 2.5 μm vs. 6 μim filament conductor will be presented. Superconducting proximity effect is also considered for 2.5 μm filament conductors.
KeywordsHelium Coherence Compaction Keystone
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.D. Johnson, private communication.Google Scholar
- 2.J. R. Sanford and D. M. Matthews, ed., internal report SSCL-SR-l056 (1990).Google Scholar
- 3.B. Aksel, private communication.Google Scholar
- 4.D. Orrell, private communication.Google Scholar
- 5.G. Morgan, private communication.Google Scholar
- 6.V. Kovachev, Energy Dissipation in Superconducting Materials, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 1991.Google Scholar
- 7.M. Wilson, Superconducting Magnets, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 1983.Google Scholar
- 8.A. K. Ghosh, private communication.Google Scholar
- 10.M. Green, Adv. Cryo. Eng. 33, 149 (1987).Google Scholar
- 11.N. Sadakata, M. Sugimoto, M. Tange, O. Kohno, Proc. MT-11, Tsukuba, Japan, 2, 944 (1989).Google Scholar
- 12.A. K. Ghosh and K. E. Robins, “Magnetization Measurement of Low Carbon Steel”, Technical Note No. 371, Brookhaven National Laboratory (1982).Google Scholar
- 13.Unpublished preliminary results from Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory.Google Scholar