Advertisement

Photobiology pp 671-682 | Cite as

Investigating Contact Photoallergy in the Mouse

  • G. Frank Gerberick
  • Cindy A. Ryan

Abstract

Contact photoallergy is a cell-mediated immunologic reaction to chemicals which histologically and mechanistically resembles contact hypersensitivity. The critical factor differentiating these two reactions is that the chemicals that produce contact photoallergy reactions require activation by ultraviolet light in order to induce or elicit the reaction. The aim of our research is to refine a mouse model for assessment of the photoallergic potential of chemicals and to develop an understanding of the factors which influence contact photoallergy. The photoallergic potential of test chemicals is assayed in cyclophosphamide treated BALB/c mice by application of the photoallergen to clipped backs for induction and to the ears for challenge. Mice are not anesthetized for either induction or challenge. Using this mouse photoallergy model, various factors that influence the induction of photoallergy were examined. Specifically, we have studied the effects of test material dose, compound application/irradiation kinetics, and ultraviolet dose and spectrum on the induction of contact photoallergy. To date, eight known human photoallergens have been tested and successfully detected, including musk ambrette, 6-methylcoumarin, and tetrachlorosalicylanilide. We feel that this mouse ear swelling photoallergy model offers potential as a model for predictive photoallergy testing. In addition, we have recently initiated in vitro studies to examine the underlying mechanisms of photoallergy using murine Langerhans cell enriched epidermal cells and lymphocytes from sensitized mice. Information gained from these in vitro studies will enhance our ability to predict a compounds photoallergic potential.

Keywords

Epidermal Cell Responder Cell Chlorpromazine Hydrochloride Iymph Node Musk Ketone 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown, W.R., Ramsay, C.A., and Shivji, G.M., 1986, Dose response studies for UVA in contact photosensitivity to TCSA in the mouse. Photodermatol, 3,334–339.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cripps, D.J. and Enta, T., 1970, Absorption and action spectra studies on bithionol and halogenated salicylanilide photosensitivity. Br. J. Dermatol., 82,230–242.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. De Groot, A.C., Van Der Walle, H.B., Jagtman, B.A. and Weyland, J.W., 1987, Contact allergy to 4-isopropyl-dibenzoylmethane and 3-(4’-methylbenzylidene) camphor in the sunscreen Eusolex 8021. Contact. Dermatitis., 16,249–254 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Epstein, J.H., 1987, Photocontact allergy in humans. Dermatotoxicology, edited by F.N. Marzulli, and H.I. Maibach. Hemisphere, Washington, pp.441–456.Google Scholar
  5. Giudici, P.A., and Maguire, H.C., JR., 1985, Experimental photoallergy to systemic drugs. J. Invest. Dermato1.,85,207–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Granstein, R.D., Morison, W.L., and Kripke, M.L., 1983a, The role of UVB radiation in the induction and elicitation of photocontact hypersensitivity to TCSA in the mouse. J. Invest. Dermatol.,80,158–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Granstein, R.D., Morison, W.L., and Kripke, M.L., 1983b, The role of suppressor cells in the induction of murine photoallergic contact dermatitis and in its suppression by prior UVB irradiation. J. Immunol.,130, 2099–2103.Google Scholar
  8. Harber, L.C., Armstrong, R.B., and Ichikawa, H., 1982, Current status of predictive animal models for drug photoallergy and their cor4.relation with drug photoallergy in humans. JNCI, 69,237–244.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hauser, C. and Katz, S.I., 1988, Activation and expansion of hapten-and protein-specific T helper cells from nonsensitized mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 85, 5625–5628.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ichikawa, H., Amstrong, R.B., and Harber, L.C., 1981, Photoallergic contact dermatitis in guinea pigs: improved induction technique using Freund’s complete adjuvant. J. Invest. Dermatol., 76, 498–501.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Inaba, K., Schuler, G., Witmer, M.D., Valinsky, J., Atassi, B. and Steinman, R.M., 1986, Immunologic properties of purified epidermal Langerhans cells Distinct requirements for stimulation of unprimed and sensitized T lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med., 164, 605–613.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jenkins, F.P., Welti, D., and Baines, D., 1964, Photochemical reactions of tetrachlorosalicylanilide. Nature, 201,827–828.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jordan, W.P., Jr, 1982, The guinea pig as a model for predicting photoallergic contact dermatitis. Contact. Dermatitis, 8, 109–1167F.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kaidbey, K., 1987, The evaluation of photoallergic contact sensitizers in humans. Dermatotoxicology, edited by F.N. Marzulli, and H.I. Maibach. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Washington, pp.457–468Google Scholar
  15. Maguire, H.C., Jr. and Kaidbey, K., 1982, Experimental photoallergic contact dermatitis: a mouse model. J. Invest. Dermatol, 79,147–152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Maurer, T., 1984, Experimental contact photoallergenicity: guinea pig models. Photodermatol, 1, 221–231.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Mituoka, A., Mitsuo, B., and Morikawa, S., 1976, Enhancement of delayed hypersensitivity by depletion of suppressor T cells with cyclophosphamide. Nature, 262, 77–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Miyachi, Y., and Takigawa, M., 1982, Mechanisms of contact photosensitivity in mice: II. Langerhans cells are required for successful induction of contact photosensitivity to TCSA. J. Invest. Dermatol., 78, 363–365.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shimada, S., Caughman, S.W., Sharrow, S.O., Stephany, D., and Katz, S.I., 1987, Enhanced antigen-presenting capacity of cultured Langerhans cells is associated with markedly increased expression of la expression. Journal of Immunology, 139, 2551–2555.Google Scholar
  20. Takigawa, M., and Miyachi, Y., 1982, Mechanisms of contact photosensitivity in mice: I. T cell regulation of contact photosensitivity to tetrachlorosalicylanilide under the genetic restrictions of the major histocompatibility complex. J. Invest. Dermatol., 79, 108–115.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Takigawa, M., Miyachi, Y., Toda, K., and Yoshioka, A., 1984, Mechanisms of contact photosensitivity in mice. IV Antigen-specific suppressor T cells induced by preirradiation of photosensitizing site to UVB. J. Immunol., 132, 1124–1129.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Tokura, Y., Takigawa, M., and Yamada, M., 1988, Induction of contact photosensitivity to TCSA using photohapten-modified syngeneic spleen cells. Archives of Dermatological Research, 280, 207–213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wennerstein, G., Thune, P., Jansen, C.T., and Brodthagen, H., 1986, Photocontact dermatitis: current status with emphasis on allergic contact photosensitivity occurrence, allergens, and practical phototesting. Seminars in Dermatology, 5, 277–289.Google Scholar
  24. Yokozeki, H., Nishioka, K., Katayama, I., Takijiri, C., and Hashoimoto, K., 1985, Induction and suppression of contact sensitivity by liposomes carrying molecules from haptenated epidermal cells. J. Invest. Dermatol., 84, 33–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Frank Gerberick
    • 1
  • Cindy A. Ryan
    • 1
  1. 1.The Procter and Gamble CoMiami Valley LaboratoriesCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations