Advertisement

Collisional Electron Detachment in Dielectric Gases

  • R. L. Champion

Abstract

The collisional dynamics of anions common to the field of gaseous dielectrics is discussed. In particular, the results from recent measurements of absolute, two-body cross sections for detachment and other inelastic processes for collisions of SF 6 - with specific targets is emphasized. These results illustrate that although the “additional” electron attached to SF 6 - is only very weakly bound (or perhaps not bound at all unless some relaxation mechanism has occurred after the anion has formed), the probability of collisionally detaching that electron is extremely small even for collision energies which exceed the electron’s binding energy by a factor as large as one hundred. The dominant collisional decomposition mechanism at low collision energies for sulphur hexafluoride anions is observed to be dissociation into, e.g., SF5 + F-. Measurements of this type can be used to provide insight into macroscopic phenomena such as discharge inception; it is clear however, that our current data base is inadequate to be used to make definitive predictions for such macroscopic phenomena.

Keywords

Collision Energy Electron Detachment Inelastic Channel Molecular Anion Macroscopic Phenomenon 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    D.L. McCorkle, A.A. Christodoulides, L.G. Christophorou and I. Szamrej, J. Chem. Phys. 72, 4049 (1980);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. L.E. Kline, D.K. Davies, C.L. Chen and P.J. Chantry, J. Appl. Phys. 50, 6789 (1979);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. A. Chutjian and S.H. Alajajian, Phys. Rev A31, 2885 (1985);Google Scholar
  4. O.J. Orient and A. Chutjian, Phys Rev. A34, 1841 (1986).Google Scholar
  5. 2.
    N. Wiegart, IEEE Trans. Electr. Insu1. EI-20, 587 (1985);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. R.J. Van Brunt, J. Appl. Phys. 59, 2314 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 3.
    For more details, see: Yicheng Wang, R.L. Champion, L.D. Doverspike, J.K. Olthoff, R.J. Van Brunt, J. Chem. Phys. 91, 2254 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 4.
    Edward C.M. Chen, Lih-Ren Shuie, Ela Desai D’sa, C.F. Batten and W.E. Wentworth, J. Chem. Phys. 88, 4711 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 5.
    See: J.K. Olthoff, R.J. Van Brunt, Yicheng Wang, R.L. Champion and L.D. Doverspike, J. Chem. Phys 91, 2261 (1989), and references cited therein.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 6.
    N.R. White, D. Scott, M.S. Huq, L.D. Doverspike and R.L. Champion, J. Chem Phys. 80, 1108 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 7.
    M.A. Hue1s, R.L. Champion, L.D. Doverspike and Yicheng Wang, Phys. Rev. A41, 4809 (1990).Google Scholar
  12. 8.
    See, e.g., L.D. Doverspike, B.T. Smith and R.L. Champion, Phys. Rev. A22, 393 (1980);Google Scholar
  13. D. Scott, M.S. Huq, R.L. Champion and L.D. Doverspike, Phys. Rev. A 32, 144 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 9.
    Unpublished results, this laboratory.Google Scholar
  15. 10.
    A.E. Roche and C.C. Goodyear, J. Phys. B 2, 191 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 11.
    C.E. Klots, Jour. Phys. Chem. 75, 1526 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. C.E. Klots, Chem. Phys. Lett. 38, 61 (1976);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. S.E. Haywood, L.D. Doverspike, R.L. Champion, E. Herbst, B.K. Annis and S. Datz, J. Chem. Phys. 74, 2845 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. L. Champion
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsCollege of William and MaryWilliamsburgUSA

Personalised recommendations