Toward Hemispheric Specialization during Infancy

Manual Skills Versus Acquisition of Speech
  • Hanuš Papoušek


My task is to comment on the three preceding chapters. Well-orchestrated topics are covered in those chapters by experienced experts and indicate that an old issue of child-rearing is gaining a new importance.


Human Speech Hemispheric Specialization Stream Segregation Preceding Chapter Evolutionary Driver 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Corballis, M. C. (1989). The race for face. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 9(1), 60–64.Google Scholar
  2. Corballis, M. C., & Morgan, M. J. (1978). On the biological basis of human laterality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 261–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. DeCasper, A. J., & Fifer, W. P. (1980). Of human bonding: Newborns prefer their mothers’ voice. Science, 208, 1174–1176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Demany, L. (1982). Auditory stream segregation in infancy. Infant Behavior and Development, 5, 261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. de Schonen, S., & Mathivet, E. (1989). First come, first served: A scenario about the development of hemispheric specialization in face recognition during infancy. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 9(1), 3–44. ai]Fassbender, C. (1989). Auditory grouping and segregation processes in infancy. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Educational Sciences, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.Google Scholar
  6. Fernald, A., & Simon, T. (1984). Expanded intonation contours in mothers’ speech to newborns. Developmental Psychology, 20, 104–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Geschwind, N., & Galaburda, A. M. (1985). Cerebral lateralization. Biological mechanisms, associations, and pathology. I. A hypothesis and a program for research. Archives of Neurology, 42, 428–459.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Greenough, W. T., Black, J. E., & Wallace, C. S. (1987). Experience and brain development. Child Development, 58, 539–559.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lieberman, P. (1984). The biology and evolution of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Papoušek, H. (1969). Individual variability in learned responses in human infants. In R. J. Robinson (Ed.), Brain and early behavior (pp. 251–266). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Papoušek, H. (1977). Entwicklung der Lernfahigkeit im Sauglingsalter. In G. Nissen (Ed.), Intelligenz, Lemen und Lernstorungen (pp. 75–93). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Papoušek, H. (1989). Coevolution of supportive counterparts in caretakers: A potential contribution to the hemispheric specialization during early infancy. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 9, 113–117.Google Scholar
  13. Papoušek, H., & Bernstein, P. (1969). The functions of conditioning stimulation in human neonates and infants. In A. Ambrose (Ed.). Stimulation in early infancy (pp. 229–252). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Papoušek, H., & Papoušek, M. (1982). Infant-adult social interactions, their origins, dimensions, and failures. In T. M. Field, A. Huston, H. C. Quay, L. Troll, & G. A. Finley (Eds.), Review of developmental psychology (pp. 148–163). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Papoušek, H., & Papoušek, M. (1983). Biological basis of social interactions: Implications of research for an understanding of behavioural deviance. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 24, 117–129.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Papoušek, H., & Papoušek, M. (1984a). Learning and cognition in the everyday life of human infants. In J. S. Rosenblatt (Ed.), Advances in the study of behavior (Vol. 14, pp. 127–163). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Papoušek, H., & Papoušek, M. (1984b). The evolution of parent-infant attachment: New psychobiological perspectives. In J. D. Call, E. Galenson, & R. L. Tyson (Eds.), Frontiers of infant psychiatry (Vol. 2, pp. 276–283). New York; Basic Books.Google Scholar
  18. Papoušek, H., & Papoušek, M. (1986). Structure and dynamics of human communication at the beginning of life. European Archives of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences, 236, 21–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Papoušek, H., & Papoušek, M. (1987). Intuitive parenting: A dialectic counterpart to the infant’s integrative competence. In J. D. Osofsky (Ed.), Handbook of infant development (2nd ed., pp. 669–720). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Papoušek, H., & Papoušek, M. (1989). Ontogeny of social interactions in newborn infants. In C. von Euler, H. Forssberg, & H. Lagercrantz (Eds.), Neurobiology of early infant behaviour. Proceedings of an International Wallenberg Symposium (Vol. 55, pp. 217–225). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Papoušek, H., & Papoušek, M. (1991). Early integrative and communicative development: Pointers to humanity. In H. M. Emrich & M. Wiegand (Eds.), Integrative biological psychiatry (pp. 97–122). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  22. Papoušek, H., Papoušek, M., Suomi, S., & Rahn, C. (1991). Preverbal communication and attachment: Comparative views. In J. L. Gewirtz & W. M. Kurtines (Eds.), Intersections with attachment. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  23. Papoušek, M., & Papoušek, H. (1981). Musical elements: Their significance for communication, cognition, and creativity. In L. P. Lipsitt (Ed.), Advances in infancy research (Vol. 1, pp. 163–224). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  24. Papoušek, M., Papoušek, H., & Bornstein, M. H. (1985). The naturalistic vocal environment of young infants: On the significance of homogeneity and variability in parental speech. In T. M. Field & N. Fox (Eds.), Social perception in infants (pp. 269–297). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  25. Papoušek, M., & Papoušek, H. (1989). Forms and functions of vocal matching in interactions between mothers and their precanonical infants. First Language, 9, 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Scheibel, A. B. (1984). A dendritic correlate of human speech. In N. Geschwind & A. M. Galaburda (Eds.), Cerebral dominance. The biological foundations (pp. 43–52). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Schoetzau, A., & Papoušek, H. (1977). Mutterliches Verhalten bei der Aufnahme von Blickkontakt mit dem Neugeborenen. Zeitschrift fur Entwicklungspsychologie und padagogische Psychologie, 9, 231–239.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hanuš Papoušek
    • 1
  1. 1.The Free UniversityAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations