Evidential Reasoning Under Probabilistic and Fuzzy Uncertainties
An expert’s knowledge of an application is concerned with general tendencies, what is likely to be the case, frequent conjunctions, rules of thumb and other forms of statistical statements. An investigator may know that a certain type of crime is common among criminals of a certain type, an insurance company may know that a person with certain characteristics is a good risk, a doctor knows that certain symptoms almost always means the person is suffering from a given disease. The conclusion in each of these cases comes from studying tendencies in a population of relevant cases and using these to infer something about an individual case.
KeywordsSupport Measure Assignment Method Possibility Distribution Focal Element Specific Evidence
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Baldwin J.F, (1986), “Support Logic Programming”, in: A.I. Jones et al,. Eds., Fuzzy Sets Theory and Applications, (Reidel, Dordrecht-Boston).Google Scholar
- Baldwin J.F. et al, (1987), “FRIL Manual”, Fril Systems Ltd, St Anne’s House, St Anne’s Rd, Bristol BS4 4A, UKGoogle Scholar
- Baldwin J.F., (1990b), “Combining Evidences for Evidential Reasoning”, Int. J. of Intelligent Systems, To Appear.Google Scholar
- Baldwin J.F., (1990c), “Towards a general theory of intelligent reasoning”, 3rd Int. Conf IPMU, Paris, July 1990Google Scholar
- Pearl J., (1988), “Probabilistic reasoning in Intelligent Systems”, Morgan Kaufmann Pub. Co.Google Scholar
- Shafer G., (1976), “A mathematical theory of evidence”, Princeton Univ. PressGoogle Scholar
- Shenoy P.P., (1989), A Valuation - Based Language for Expert Systems, Int. J. of Approx. Reasoning, V013, No. 5.Google Scholar