Skip to main content

A Tutorial on Parametric Nonlinear Programming Sensitivity and Stability Analysis

  • Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, we will consider general parametric nonlinear programming (NLP) problems of the form

$$\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} \hfill {P(\varepsilon )} & \hfill {\mathop{{minimize}}\limits_{x} f(x,\varepsilon ) s.t. {g_{i}}(x,\varepsilon ) \geqslant 0,} & \hfill {i = 1, \ldots ,m,} \\ \hfill {} & \hfill {{h_{j}}(x,\varepsilon ) = 0,} & \hfill {j = 1, \ldots ,p,} \\ \end{array}$$

where f, g i , h j : R n × R r R 1 and ε ∈ R r is a perturbation parameter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armstrong, R., A. Chames, and C. Haksever, “Implementation of Successive Linear Programming Algorithms for Non-Convex Goal Programming,” Computers and Operations Research 15 (1988), 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chames, A. and W.W. Cooper, “Structural Sensitivity Analysis in Linear Programming and an Exact Product Form Left Inverse,” Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 15 (1968), 517–522.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chames, A., W.W. Cooper, and B. Mellon, “A Model for Programming and Sensitivity Analysis in an Integrated Oil Company,” Econometrica 22 (1954), 193–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chames, A., S. Duffuaa, and M. Ryan, “The More-for-Less Paradox in Linear Programming,” European Journal of Operational Research 31 (1987), 194–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chames, A. and R.E. Gemmell, “A Method of Solution of Some Nonlinear Problems in Abatement of Stream Pollution,” Systems Research Memorandum No. 103, The Technological Institute, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ecker, J.G., “A Geometric Programming Model for Optimal Allocation of Stream Dissolved Oxygen,” Management Science 21 (1975), 658–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fiacco, A.V., “Sensitivity Analysis for Nonlinear Programming Using Penalty Methods,” Mathematical Programming 10 (1976), 287–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fiacco, A.V., Introduction to Sensitivity and Stability Analysis in Nonlinear Programming, Academic Press, New York, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fiacco, A.V. and A. Ghaemi, “A User’s Manual for SENSUMT: A Penalty Function Computer Program for Solution, Sensitivity Analysis and Optimal Value Bound Calculation in Parametric Nonlinear Programs,” Technical Paper, Institute for Management Science and Engineering, George Washington University, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fiacco, A.V. and A. Ghaemi, “Sensitivity and Parametric Bound Analysis of Optimal Steam Turbine Exhaust Annulus and Condenser Sizes,” Technical Paper T-437, Institute for Management Science and Engineering, George Washington University, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fiacco, A.V. and A. Ghaemi, “Sensitivity Analysis of a Nonlinear Water Pollution Control Model Using an Upper Hudson River Data Base,” Operations Research 30 (1982), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fiacco, A.V. and A. Ghaemi, “Sensitivity Analysis of a Nonlinear Structural Design Problem,” Computers and Operations Research 9 (1982), 29–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fiacco, A.V. and J. Kyparisis, “Computable Parametric Bounds for Simultaneous Large Perturbations of Thirty Parameters in a Water Pollution on Abatement GP Model, Part I: Optimal Value Bounds,” Technical Paper T-453, Institute for Management Science and Engineering, George Washington University, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fiacco, A.V. and J. Kyparisis, “Computable Parametric Bounds for Simul-taneous Large Perturbations of Thirty Parameters in a Water Pollution on Abatement GP Model, Part II: Refinement of Optimal Value Bounds and Parametric Solution Bounds,” Technical Paper T-461, Institute for Management Science and Engineering, George Washington University, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fiacco, A.V. and J. Kyparisis, “Sensitivity Analysis in Nonlinear Programming under Second Order Assumptions,” in A. Bagchi and H.Th. Jongen (eds.), Systems and Optimization, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fiacco, A.V. and J. Kyparisis, “Convexity and Concavity Properties of the Optimal Value Function in Parametric Nonlinear Programming,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 48 (1986), 95–126.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fiacco, A.V. and J. Kyparisis, “Computable Bounds on Parametric Solutions of Convex Problems,” Mathematical Programming 40 (1988), 213–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fiacco, A.V. and G.P. McCormick, Nonlinear Programming: Sequential Unconstrained Minimization Techniques, Wiley, New York, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jittorntrum, K., Sequential Algorithms in Nonlinear Programming, doctoral dissertation, Australian National University, Canberra, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jittorntrum, K., “Solution Point Differentiability Without Strict Cornplementarity in Nonlinear Programming,” Mathematical Programming Study 21 (1984), 127–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kojima, M., “Strongly Stable Stationary Solutions in Nonlinear Programs,” in S.M. Robinson (ed.), Analysis and Computation of Fixed Points, Academic Press, New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kyparisis, J. and A.V. Fiacco, “Generalized Convexity and Concavity of the Optimal Value Function in Nonlinear Programming,” Mathematical Programming 39 (1987), 285–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mangasarian, O.L. and J.B. Rosen, “Inequalities for Stochastic Nonlinear Programming Problems,” Operations Research 12 (1964), 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Robinson, S.M., “Perturbed Kuhn—Tucker Points and Rates of Convergence for a Class of Nonlinear Programming Algorithms,” Mathematical Programming 7 (1974), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Robinson, S.M. “Strongly Regular Generalized Equations,” Mathematics of Operations Research 5 (1980), 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shapiro, A., “Second Order Sensitivity Analysis and Asymptotic Theory of Parametrized Nonlinear Programs,” Mathematical Programming 33 (1985), 280–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fiacco, A.V., Kyparisis, J. (1992). A Tutorial on Parametric Nonlinear Programming Sensitivity and Stability Analysis. In: Phillips, F.Y., Rousseau, J.J. (eds) Systems and Management Science by Extremal Methods. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3600-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3600-0_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6599-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-3600-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics