Advertisement

Movement Primitives in the Frog Spinal Cord

  • S. Giszter
  • F. A. Mussa-Ivaldi
  • E. Bizzi

Abstract

We present evidence for the generation of stable convergent force field patterns and muscle synergies in the spinal cord of the frog. These synergies may form the bases of postural and trajectory adjustments. We present recent analyses which show that (1) similarly structured force fields underlie natural behaviors (2) the active fields underlying both microstimulation and natural behavioral force fields are structurally invariant but may be modulated in overall force amplitude and stiffness (3) these fields are drawn from a limited set of such fields (4) these invariant fields can be used to predict the termination position of limb endpoint trajectories in the unrestrained limb (5) in those instances tested multiple stimulations resulted in fields proportional to the vectorial summation of the fields resulting from single stimulations. This recent body of work suggests that we may view the spinal cord as possessing a small number of movement primitives: circuits that may specify invariant force fields which may be combined in a more or less flexible manner to produce adjustable behaviors.

Keywords

Spinal Cord Force Field Natural Behavior Flexible Manner Muscle Synergy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Abstract

  1. Alstermark B and Sasaki S (1986) Integration in descending motor pathways controlling the forelimb in the cat 15. Comparison of the projection from excitatory C3–C4 propriospinal neurones to different species of forelimb motoneurones. Exp. Brain Res. 63: 543–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berkinblitt MB, Feldman AG, and Fukson OI (1989) Wiping reflex in the frog: Movement patterns,receptive fields and blends. pp. 615–630 inVisuomotor Coordination: amphibians, comparisons. models and robots.(J.-P. Ewert and M.A. Arbib Eds). Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bizzi E, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, and Giszter SF (1991) Computations underlying the execution of movement: a novel biological perspective. Science 253:287–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bizzi E, Accomero N, Chapple W and Hogan N (1984) Posture control and trajectory formation during arm movement. J. Neurosci. 4:2738–2744.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen AH (1987) The structure and function of the intersegmental coordinating system of the lamprey central pattern generation for locomotion. J. Comp. Physiol. 160: 181–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Feldman AG (1979) Central and reflex mechanisms of motor control. Nauka, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  7. Fukson OI, Berkinblitt MB and Feldman AG (1980) The spinal frog takes into account the scheme of its body during the wiping reflex. Science 209: 1261–1263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Georgopoulos AP, Kettner RE and Schwartz AB (1988a) Primate motor cortex and free arm movements to visual targets in three-dimensional space.I. Relations between single cell discharge and direction of movement. J. Neurosci. 8: 2913–2927.Google Scholar
  9. Georgopoulos AP, Kettner RE and Schwartz AB (1988b) Primate motor cortex and free arm movements to visual targets in three-dimensional space.II. Coding of the direction of movement by a neuronal population. J. Neurosci. 8: 2928–2937.Google Scholar
  10. Giszter SF, McIntyre J and Bizzi E (1989) Kinematic strategies and sensorimotor transformations in the wiping movements of frogs. J. Neurophysiol. 62: 750–767.Google Scholar
  11. Giszter SF, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, and Bizzi E (199la) Equilibrium point mechanisms in the spinal frog. In: M. Arbib and J.P. Ewert (eds.)Visual Structures and integrated functionsPlenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Giszter SF, Mussa-Ivaldi FA, and Bizzi E (1991b) The organization of motor space in the frog spinal cord. Exp. Brain Res (In press).Google Scholar
  13. Giszter SF, Bizzi E, and Mussa-Ivaldi FA (1991) Motor organization in the frog spinal cord. In: F.H. Eeckman and C.D. Deno (eds.)Analysis and Modelling of neural systems.Kluwer Press, Moffett Field, CA, 1991Google Scholar
  14. Grillner S and Wallen P (1985) Central pattern generators for locomotion, with special reference to vertebrates. Annual Rev. Neurosci. 8: 233–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grobstein, P (1990) Strategies for analyzing complex organization in the nervous system. II. A case study: Directed movement and spatial representation in the frog. pp. 242–255 inComputational Neuroscience(E. L. Schwartz Ed.) M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  16. Jhaveri S and Frank E (1983) Central projections of the brachial nerve in bullfrogs: muscle and cutaneous afferents project to different regions of the spinal cord. J. Comp. Neurol. 221: 304–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lichtman JW, Wilkinson RS and Rich MM (1985) Multiple innervation of tonic endplates revealed by activity-dependent uptake of florescent probes. Nature 314: 357–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Masino T and Grobstein P (1989a) The organization of descending tectofugal pathways underlying orienting in the frogRana pipiers.I. Lateralization, pracellation, and an intermediate spatial representation. Exp. Brain Res. 75:227–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Masino T and Knudsen EI (1990) Horizontal and vertical components of head movement are controlled by distinct neural circuits in the barn owl. Nature 345: 434–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McClellan A and Sigvardt K (1988) Features of entrainment of spinal pattern generators for locomotor activity in the lamprey spinal cord. J. Neurosci. 8: 133–145.Google Scholar
  21. Mortin LI, Keifer J and Stein PSG (1985) Three forms of the scratch reflex in the spinal turtle: Movement Analyses. J. Neurophysiol. 53: 1501–1516.Google Scholar
  22. Mussa-Ivaldi FA, Giszter SF and Bizzi E (1991) Motor-space coding in the central nervous system. In: Cold Spring Harbor symposium on quantitative biology, vol. LV Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press 53.Google Scholar
  23. D.J. Ostry, A.G. Feldman, J.R. Flanagan, J. Neurophysiol. 65, 547 (1991).Google Scholar
  24. Preparata FP and Shamos MI (1988)Computational GeometryAddison Wesley, N.Y.Google Scholar
  25. Robertson GA, Mortin LI, Keifer J and Stern PSG (1985) Three forms of the scratch reflex in the spinal turtle: central generation of motor patterns. J. Neurophysiol. 53: 1517–1534.Google Scholar
  26. Schotland JL, Lee WA and Rymer WZ (1989) Wiping and flexion withdrawal reflexes display different EMG patterns prior to movement onset in the spinalized frog. Exp. Brain Res. 78: 649–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Simpson JI (1976) Functional synaptology of the spinal cord pp. 728–749 inFrog NeurolliologyLLinas R and Precht W, Eds, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stein PSG (1983) The vertebrate scratch reflex. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 37: 398–403.Google Scholar
  29. Stein PSG, Mortin LI and Robertson GA (1986) The forms of a task and their blends. In: S. Grinner, P. Stein, DG Stuart, H Forssberg and RM Herman (Eds)Neurobiology of Vertebrate LocomotionMacmillian, London,201–216.Google Scholar
  30. Windhorst UR (1991) Group report: What are the units of motor behavior and how are they controlled? with Burke RE, Dieringer N, Evinger C, FeldmanAG, Hasan Z, Hultbom H, Illert M, Lundberg AP, Macpherson JM, Massion J, Nichols TR, Schwartz M, Vilis T. pp101–120 inMotor Control: Concepts and Issues.Humphrey DR and Freund H-J Eds. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Giszter
    • 1
  • F. A. Mussa-Ivaldi
    • 1
  • E. Bizzi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Brain and Cognitive SciencesMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations