Advertisement

A resonance model of high frequency binaural phase sensitivity in the barn owl’s auditory brainstem

  • Clay Spence
  • John Pearson

Abstract

The auditory system of the barn owl (tyto alba) contains neurons sensitive to the phase of sounds of remarkably high frequency up to 9 kHz. Nucleus Laminaris represents phase differences as part of the computation of stimulus azimuth. The high frequency of the stimulus and the high level of noise in the input spike trains make the response properties of laminaris neurons hard to explain. We use simulations and semi-numerical analysis to show that the cellular and synaptic time constants must be unreasonably fast in order for ordinary biophysical mechanisms to reproduce the observed behavior. Several people have suggested that a resonance mechanism may exist in laminaris neurons to amplify the signal. We present a simple neuronal resonance model that can deal with realistic input.

Keywords

Spike Train Synaptic Conductance Nucleus Magnocellularis Single Compartment Model Membrane Time Constant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carr, C.E. and M. Konishi (1988). Axonal delay lines create maps of interaural phase difference in the owl’s brainstem. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:8311–8315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carr, C.E. and M. Konishi (1990). A circuit for detection of interaural time differences in the brainstem of the barn owl. J. Neurosci. 10:3227–3246.Google Scholar
  3. Hill, A.V. (1936). Excitation and accommodation in nerve. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B, 119:305–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hudspeth, A.J. (1985). The cellular basis of hearing: the biophysics of hair cells. Science, 230:745–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jeffress, L.A. (1948). A place theory of sound localization. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 41:35–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. MacGregor, R.J. (1987). Neural and Brain Modelling. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  7. Moiseff, A. and M. Konishi (1981). Neuronal and behavioral sensitivity to binaural time differences in the owl. J. Neurosci. 1:40–48.Google Scholar
  8. Moiseff, A. (1989). Bi-coordinate sound localization by the barn owl. J. Comp. Physiol. 164:637–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sullivan, W.E. and M. Konishi (1984). Segregation of stimulus phase and intensity coding in the cochlear nucleus of the barn owl. J. Neurosci. 4: 1787–1799.Google Scholar
  10. Sullivan, W.E. and M. Konishi (1986). Neural map of interaural phase difference in the barn owl’s brainstem. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:8400–8404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clay Spence
    • 1
  • John Pearson
    • 1
  1. 1.David Sarnoff Research Center CN5300PrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations