The Hamster Cheek Pouch Model of Carcinogenesis and Chemoprevention

  • Irma B. Gimenez-Conti
  • Thomas J. Slaga
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 320)

Abstract

The Syrian golden hamster cheek pouch carcinogenesis model is probably the best-known animal system for studying events involved in the development of premalignancy and malignancy in human oral cancer. Like the mouse skin model of carcinogenesis, the hamster cheek pouch model provides data on the effect of carcinogens, promoters, and chemopreventive agents, which makes both these models very useful in selecting chemopreventive agents for human cancer intervention studies (1–8). Our first approach to understanding the important early events that occur in the hamster cheek pouch model of carcinogenesis was to compare this model with the mouse skin model, in which a number of critical events have already been well characterized (9–11). The carcinogenesis studies in the hamster cheek pouch were carried out using multiple applications of 7,12-dimethylbenz[a] an thracene (DMBA) (0.5% in mineral oil, 3 times a week). This protocol induced a hyperplastic response in the pouch epithelium after only a few applications, followed by the appearance after 6–8 weeks of treatment of a variety of dysplastic lesions resembling human premalignant lesions. Benign and malignant tumors (papillomas and squamous cell carcinomas [SCCs]) started to develop after 10 weeks of treatment (12,13).

Keywords

Peroxide Acetone Hydrocarbon Paraffin Dermatol 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Solt DB, Polverini PP, Calderon L. Carcinogenic response of hamster buccal pouch epithelium to 4 polycyclic aromatin hydrocarlx)ns. J Oral Pathol 16:294–302, 1987.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Odukoya O, Shklar G. Initiation and promotion in experimental oral carcinogenesis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 58:315–320, 1984.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Odukoya O, Hawach F, Shklar G. Retardation of experimental oral cancer by topical vitamin E. Nutr Cancer 6:98–104,1984.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Trickier D, Shklar G. Prevention by vitamin E of experimental oral carcinogenesis. J Nail Cancer Inst 78:165–169, 1987.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shklar G, Schwartz J, Grau D, Trickier DP, Wallace KD. Inhibition of hamster buccal pouch carcinogenesis by 13-cis-retinoic acid. Oral Surg 50:45–52, 1980.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schwartz J, Shklar G. Regression of experimental oral carcinomas by local injection of p-carotene and canthaxanthin. Nutr Cancer 11:35–40, 1988.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schwartz J, Shklar G. Regression of experimental hamster cancer by beta carotene and algae extracts. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45:510–515, 1987.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Messadi DV, Billings P, Shklar G, Kennedy AR. Inhibition of oral carcinogenesis by a protease inhibitor. J Natl Cancer Inst 76:447–452, 1986.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aldaz CM, Conti CJ, Larcher F, Trono D, Roop DR, Chcsner J, Whitehead T, Slaga TJ. Sequential development of aneuploidy, keratin modifications, an γ-glut myltransferase expression in mouse skin papillomas. Cancer Res 48:3253–3257, 1988.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gimenez-Conti IB, Aldaz CM, Bianchi AB, Roop DR, Slagi TJ, Conti CJ. Early expression of type I K13 keratin in the progression of mouse skin papillomas. Carcinogenesis 11:1995–1999, 1990.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bianchi AB, Aldaz.CM, Conti CJ. Non-random duplication of the chromosome bearing a mutated Ha-ras-1 allele in mouse skin tumors. Proc Nat! Acad Sci USA 87:6902–6906, 1990.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Morris AL. Factors influencing experimental carcinogenesis in the hamster cheek pouch. J Dent Res 40:3–15, 1961.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gimenez-Conti IB, Shin DM, Bianchi AB, Roop DR, Hong WK, Conti CJ, Slaga TJ. Changes in keratin expression during 7,12-dimethylbenz[¦Á]anthracene-induced hamster cheek pouch carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 50:4441–4445, 1990.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Solt DB. Localization of gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase in hamster buccal pouch epithelium treated with 7,12dimethylbenzta]anthracene. J Nail Cancer Inst 67:193–199, 1981.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Solt DB, Shklar G. Rapid induction of y-glutamyltranspeptidase-rich intraepithelial clones in 7,12dimethylbenzta]anthracene-treated hamster buccal pouch. Cancer Res 42:285–291, 1982.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Odajima T, Solt DB, Calderon SL. Persistence of y-glutamyltranspeptidase-positive foci during hamster buccal pouch carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 44:2062–2067, 1984.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Murase N, Fukui S, Mori M. Heterogeneity of keratin distribution in the oral mucosa and skin of mammals as determined using monoclonal antibodies. Histochemistry 85:265–276, 1986.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tatemoto Y, Fukui S, Oosumi H, Horike H, Mori M. Expression of keratins during experimentally induced carcinogenesis in hamster cheek pouch visualized polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies. Histochemistry 86:445–452, 1987.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Roop DR, Cheng CK, Titterington L, Meyers CA, Stanley JR, Reinert PM, Yuspa SH. Synthetic peptides corresponding to keratin subunits elicit highly specific antibodies. J Biol Chem 6259:8037–8040, 1984.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Roop DR, Kreig TM, Mehrel T, Cheng CK, Yuspa SH. Transcriptional control of high molecular weight keratin gene expression in multistage skin carcinogcncsis. Cancer Res 48:3245–3252, 1988.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Moll R, Franke WW, Schiller B, Geiger B, Krcplcr R. The catalog of human cytokeratins: Patterns of expression in normal epithelia, tumors and cultured cells. Cell 31:11–24, 1982.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shin DM, Gimenez IB, Lee J S, Nishioka K, Wargovich Thacher S, Lotan R, Slaga TJ, Hong WK. Expression of epidermal growth factor receptor, polyamine levels, omithine decarboxylase activity, micronuclei and transglutaminase I in a 7,12-dimethylbenzlajanthracene-induced hamster buccal pouch carcinogenesis model. Cancer Res 50:2505–2510, 1990.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thacher SM. Purification of keratinocyte transglutaminase and its expression during squamous differentiation. J Invest Dennatol 89:578–584, 1989.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mansbridges JN, Knapp AM. Changes in keratinocyte maturation during wound healing. J Invest Dermatol 89:253–263, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    O’Brien TG. The induction of ornithine decarboxylase as an early possible obligatory event in mouse skin carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 36:2644–2653, 1976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Klein-Szanto AJP, Major SM, Slaga TJ. Induction of dark keratinocytes by 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13acetate and meerein as an indicator of tumor-promoting efficiency. Carcinogenesis 1:399–406, 1980.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Slaga TJ, Klein-SzantoA JP, Triplett LL, Yotti LP, Trosko J E. Skin tumor promoting activity of benzoyl peroxide, a widely used free radical-generating compound. Science 213:1023–1025, 1981.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Klein-Szanto AJP, Slaga TJ. Effects of peroxides on rodent skin: Epidermal hyperplasia and tumor promotion. J Invest Dennatol 79:30–34, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ploton D, Menagcr M, Jeannesson P, Himber G, Pigeon F, Adnet JJ. Improvement in the staining and in the visualization of the argyrophi I is proteins of the nucleolar organizer region at the optical level. Histochem J 18:5–14, 1986.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yoshimi N, Gimenez-Conti I, Conti CJ, Slaga TJ. Changes of nucleolar organizer regions (NORs) in hamster cheek pouch chemical carcinogenesis. Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research 31:125, 1990.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irma B. Gimenez-Conti
    • 1
  • Thomas J. Slaga
    • 1
  1. 1.Science Park—Research DivisionThe University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer CenterSmithvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations