Many Body Effects in Fast Ion-Atom Collisions

  • John F. Reading
  • A. L. Ford


Traditionally in atomic physics the many body aspect of the problem has fo-cussed on energy levels of atoms, where correlation plays a role at the few per cent level. In this paper we present an overview for non-specialists of the much larger effect that correlation has on cross sections for excitation, ionization and charge transfer in an ion atom collision. New methods for time dependent perturbations of many body systems have been developed which might be of interest to a many body audience. But more importantly, we hope to stimulate work by many body experts in the problems which yet have to be solved.


Inclusive Cross Section Impulse Approximation Time Dependent Perturbation Neon Atom Independent Particle Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R. Glauber Lectures in Theoretical Physics vol. II, eds. W.E. Brittin et al., New York: Interscience (1959).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Knudsen, L.H. Andersen, P. Hvelplund, G. Astner, H. Danared, L. Liljebi and K.G. Rensfelt, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 17, 3545 (1984); L.H. Andersen, P. Hvelpund, H. Knudsen, S.P. Moller, K.G. Elsener, K.G. Reensfelt, and E. Uggerhoj, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2147 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.H. McGuire, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1153 (1982); J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 17, 1779 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J.F. Reading and A.L. Ford, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 20, 3747 (1987); Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 543 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J.F. Reading, Phys. Rev. A8, 3262 (1973); J.F. Reading and A.L. Ford, ibid A21, 124 (1980); J. Reinhardt, B. Muller, W. Greiner and G. Soff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1307 (1979).ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R.L. Becker, A.L. Ford and J.F. Reading, Phys. Rev. A29, 3111 (1984).ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. F. Reading, A. L. Ford and R. L. Becker, Nucl. Inst. Meth. 169, 273 (1980); R. L. Becker, A. L. Ford and J. F. Reading, J. Phys. B: Atom. Mol. Phys. 13, 4059 (1980); Phys. Rev. A 23, 510 (1981).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Rodbro, E.H. Pedersen, C.L. Cocke and J.R. McDonald, Phys. Rev. A19, 1936 (1979).ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    C.L. Cocke and P.K. Gardner, Phys. Rev. A16, 2248 (1977).ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.R. McDonald, C.L. Cockeand W.W. Eidson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 648 (1974); M. Rodbro, E.H. Pedersen, C.L. Cocke and J.R. McDonald, Phys. Rev. A19, 1936 (1979).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    J.D. Garcia, Nuclear Instruments and Methods A240, 552 (1985).ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    I.M. Cheshire, Proc. Soc. Phys. 84, 89 (1964); W.B. Riesenfeld and K.M. Watson, Phys. Rev. 102, 1157 (1956).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J.P. Giese and Erik Horsdal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2018 (1988); E.Y. Kamber, C.L. Cocke, S. Cheng and S.L. Varghese, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2026 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • John F. Reading
  • A. L. Ford
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Theoretical Physics Department of PhysicsTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations