Advertisement

DNA Probes for Viral Diagnosis

  • Harley A. Rotbart
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 312)

Abstract

Great excitement has surrounded the development of molecular hybridization techniques for viruses because of the potential of nucleic acid probes as diagnostic reagents. The need for rapid and accurate viral diagnosis has become particularly pressing with the recent availability of numerous drugs which have been clinically proven as effective in antiviral chemotherapy and prophylaxis. Additionally, even for those viruses for which no therapy is currently available or for which none is needed, the ability to diagnose a causative viral pathogen in a patient with a disease of protean manifestations and multiple possible etiologies is of value. Many such patients are routinely treated empirically with unnecessary antibacterial or antifungal drugs until bacterial and/or fungal disease can be ruled out. Proof of viral etiology in such patients will reduce unnecessary therapy and even unnecessary hospitalization. Furthermore, identification of a specific viral pathogen will often allow the physician to predict the patient’s prognosis and need for future care. Viral diagnosis also plays an important role in epidemiology and hospital infection control, where knowledge of the specific infecting virus is critical to characterizing and containing the spread of the virus from person to person. Finally, viral diagnosis can be both money saving and money earning for a hospital and clinic.

Keywords

Hybridization Assay Nucleic Acid Hybridization Nucleic Acid Probe Hospital Infection Control Indirect Label 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ambinder, R.F., Charche, P., Staal, S., Wright, P., Forman, M., Hayward, S.D., and Hayward, G.S., 1986, The vector homology problem in diagnostic nucleic acid hybridization of clinical specimens, J. Clin. Microbiol. 24:16–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Chernesky, M.A., 1989, An evolutionary change in diagnostic virology, Yale J. Biol. Med. 62:89–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Edberg, S.C., 1985, Principles of nucleic acid hybridization and comparison with monoclonal antibody technology for the diagnosis of infectious diseases, Yale J. Biol. Med. 58:425–442.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Eisenstein, B.I., 1990, New molecular techniques for microbial epidemiology and the diagnosis of infectious diseases, J. Infect. Dis. 161:595–602.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Geiger, R., Hauber, R., and Miska, W., 1989, New bioluminescence-enhanced detection systems for use in enzyme activity tests, enzyme immunoassays, protein blotting and nucleic acid hybridization, Mol. Cell Probes 3:309–328.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hsiung, G.D., 1989, The impact of cell culture sensitivity on rapid viral diagnosis: A historical perspective, Yale J. Biol. Med. 62:79–88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Landry, M.L., Mayo, D.R., and Hsiung, G.D., 1989, Rapid and accurate viral diagnosis, Pharmac. Ther. 2:287–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Matthews, J.A., Batki, A., Hynds, C., and Kricka, L.J., 1985, Enhanced chemiluminescent method for the detection of DNA dot-hybridization assays, Anal. Biochem. 151:205–209.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Matthews, J.A., and Kricka, L.J., 1988, Analytical strategies for the use of DNA probes, Anal. Biochem. 169:1–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Meinkoth, J., and Wahl, G., 1984, Hybridization of nucleic acids immobilized on solid supports, Anal. Biochem. 138:267–284.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Norval, M., and Bingham, R.W., 1987, Advances in the use of nucleic acid probes in diagnosis of viral diseases of man, Arch. Virol. 97:151–165.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Richman, D.D., 1987, Developments in rapid viral diagnosis, Infect. Dis. Clin. NA 1:311–322.Google Scholar
  13. Richman, D.D., Cleveland, P.H., Redfield, D.C., Oxman, M.N., and Wahl, G.M., 1984, Rapid viral diagnosis, J. Infect. Dis. 149:298–310.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Siegler, N., 1989, DNA-based testing: A progress report, ASM News 55:308–312Google Scholar
  15. F.C.,Tenover,1988, Diagnostic deoxyribonucleic acid probes for infectious diseases, Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1:82–101.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Thomas, P.S., 1980, Hybridization of denatured RNA and small DNA fragments transferred to nitrocellulose, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77:5201–5205.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Van Brunt, J., and Klausner, A., 1987, Pushing probes to market, Biotechnology 5:211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Viscidi, R.P., and Yolken, R.G., 1987, Molecular diagnosis of infectious diseases by nucleic acid hybridization, Mol. Cell Probes 1:3–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Wahl, G.M., Stern, M., and Stark, G.R., 1979, Efficient transfer of large DNA fragments from agarose gels to diazobenzyloxymethyl-paper and rapid hybridization by using dextran sulfate, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76:3683–3687.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. White, B.A., and Bancroft, F.C., 1982, Cytoplasmic dot hybridization: Simple analysis of relative mRNA levels in multiple small cell or tissue samples, J. Biol. Chem. 257:8569–8572.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Yolken, R.H., 1988, Nucleic acids or immunoglobulins: which are the molecular probes of the future?, Mol. Cell Probes 2:87–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Yolken, R.H., Coutlee, F., and Viscidi, R.P., 1989, New prospects for the diagnosis of viral infections, Yale J. Biol. Med. 62:131–139.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harley A. Rotbart
    • 1
  1. 1.School of MedicineUniversity of ColoradoDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations