Random Dynamics, Three Generations, and Skewness

  • Holger Bech Nielsen
Part of the Series of the Centro de Estudios Científicos de Santiago book series (SCEC)

Abstract

The two talks I shall present here will in a way be almost the same one, the second time given in reverse order. In the first one—called random dynamics—I shall present a project which I and others have worked on for several years.1,2 We seek to derive the already known laws of nature as a result of almost any very complicated fundamental model. In the second talk we look at the Standard Model—especially the structure of the gauge group—and, inspired by that, seek to get information on the fundamental laws of nature at a deeper level. I, of course, want to be able to say that nature points in the direction of a random rather chaotic fundamental model, and thus the second talk becomes number one in reverse order. A major prediction3,4—which I want to stress we made before the LEP experiments confirmed it—is that there should be only three generations of quarks and leptons!

Keywords

Entropy Manifold Foam Rubber Turkey 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    H. B. Nielsen: “Dual strings” (see section on Catastrophe Theory), in Fundamentals of Quark Models, Proc. of the XVII Scottish Univ. Summer School in Phys., St. Andrews, 1976 (I. M. Barbour and A. T. Davies, eds.), Univ. of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland (1976), pp. 528–543.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. B. Nielsen, D. Bennett, and N. Brene, in Recent Developments in Quantum Field Theory, Proc. of the Niels Bohr Centennial Conf., Copenhagen 1985 (J. Ambjørn, B. J. Durhuus, and J. L. Petersen, eds.), North Holland, Amsterdam (1985), and references therein.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. Bennett, H. B. Nielsen, and I. Picek, Phys. Lett. 208B, 275 (1988).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Bennett, H. B. Nielsen, and I. Picek, “Number of generations related to coupling constants by confusion,” talk presented by H. B. Nielsen at the XX Int. Symp. on the Theory of Elementary Particles, Ahrenshoop, 13-17 Oct. 1986, or NBI-preprint NBI-HE-87-04.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    W. Heisenberg: Introduction to the Unified Field Theory of Elementary Particles, London, Interscience (1966). Translated from Einführung in die einheitliche Felttheorie der Elementarteilchen, Hirch, Stuttgart (1966). A later article on the subject is H. P. Dürr, Heisenbergs einheitliche Feldtheorie der Elementarteilchen, in Heisenberg Gedenkenbuch 1981, Deutsche Akad. der Naturforscher, Leopoldina.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Weinberg, Trans. New York Acad. Sciences, Ser. II, 38, 185 (1977). See also C. D. Froggatt and H. B. Nielsen, Origin of Symmetries, World Scientific, Singapore, in preparation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Lehto, M. Ninomiya, and H. B. Nielsen, Nucl. Phys. B272, 213–227 (1986); Nucl. Phys. B272, 228-252 (1986); Nucl. Phys. B289, 684-700 (1987).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    H. B. Nielsen and N. Brene, Workshop on Skyrmions and Anomalies, Krakow, 1987, World Scientific, Singapore (1987); N. Brene and H. B. Nielsen, Nucl. Phys. B224, 326 (1983); H. B. Nielsen and D. Bennett, “Amorphous gauge glass theory,” in Proc. of the Workshop on Statistical Physics and Related Topics in Biophysics, Technical Univ. of Denmark, Lyngby, 1987, pp. 58-69.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. Susskind, “What are the possibilities for extending our understanding of elementary particles and their interactions to much greater energies?” in, Proc. of the XVIII Solvay Conf. on Physics at the Univ. of Texas, Austin, Texas, U.S.A., Nov. 1982 (L. Van Hove, ed.), Phys. Rep. C104, 181 (1984).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. B. Nielsen and N. Brene, in Proc. of the XVIII Int. Symp., Ahrenshoop, Inst. f. Hochenergiephysik, Akad. der Wissenschaften der DDR, Berlin-Zeuthen 1985.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. Bennett and H. B. Nielsen: “The three Yang-Mills coupling constants from Planck scale criticality and a maximal entropy principle,” (in preparation).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. B. Nielsen and N. Brene, Phys. Lett. B223, 399 (1989); H. B. Nielsen and N. Brene, in “The Gardener of Eden”, Physicalia Mag. 12 (Suppl.) special issue in honour of R. Brout’s 60th birthday (P. Nicoletopoulos and J. Orloff, eds.), Gent, Belgium (1990).MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. B. Nielsen, Acta Phys. Polon. B20, 427 (1989).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    C. Jarlskog, Spåtind Conf. 1988 (unpubl.); see for example Phys. Rev. D36, 2128–2136 (1987).ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    L. O’Raifeartaigh: Group Structure of Gauge Theories, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1986); L. Michel: “Invariance in Quantum Mechanics, Group Theoretical Concepts and Methods in Elementary Particle Physics,” Lectures at the Istanbul Summer School of Phys., July 16-Aug. 4, 1962 (Feza Gürsey, ed.), Middle East Technical Univ., Ankara, Turkey, Gordon & Breach, New York (1964).MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Holger Bech Nielsen
    • 1
  1. 1.Niels Bohr InstituteUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagen ØDenmark

Personalised recommendations