Magnetic Shielding for a Spaceborne Adiabatic Demagnetization Refrigerator (ADR)

  • Brent A. Warner
  • Peter J. Shirron
  • Stephen H. Castles
  • Aristides T. Serlemitsos
Part of the Advances in Cryogenic Engineering book series (ACRE, volume 37)

Abstract

The Goddard Space Flight Center has studied magnetic shielding for an adiabatic demagnetization refrigerator. Four types of shielding were studied: active coils, passive ferromagnetic shells, passive superconducting coils, and passive superconducting shells. The passive superconducting shells failed by allowing flux penetration. The other three methods were successful, singly or together.

Experimental studies of passive ferromagnetic shielding are compared with calculations made using the Poisson Group of programs, distributed by the Los Alamos Accelerator Code Group of the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Agreement between calculation and experiment is good. The ferromagnetic material is a silicon iron alloy.

Keywords

Permeability Furnace Welding Helium Epoxy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    U. E. Israelsson and C. M. Gould, High-field magnet for low temperature low-field cryostats, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 55:1143 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. A. Muething et al, Small solenoid with a superconducting shield for nuclear-magnetic-resonance near 1 mK, Rev. Sci. Instrum 53:485 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sandy Holdorf, Private Communication, 3M Company, (1987).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    B.W. Roberts, Survey of superconductive materials and critical evaluation of selected properties, J. Phys Chem. Ref. Data 50:581 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. T. Timbie, G. M. Bernstein, and P. L. Richards, Development of an adiabatic demagnetization refrigerator for SIRTF, Cryogenics 30:271 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Michael L. Dingus, “Adiabatic Demagnetization Refrigerator for Use in Zero Gravity,” Final Report on Contract NAS5-29418, Alabama Cryogenic Engineering, Huntsville, Alabama (1988).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    F. W. Ackermann, W. A. Klawitter, and J. J. Drautman, Magnetic properties of commercial soft magnetic alloys at cryogenic temperatures, in: “Advances in Cryogenic Engineering,” Vol. 16, Plenum Press, New York (1971), p. 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. W. Ackermann and D. Dietrich, personal communication: Carpenter Technology Corporation internal memorandum used in preparing Ackermann et al.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. F. Arentz and M. H. Johnson, Magnetic shielding in a cryogenic environment, Evaluation Engineering, 25:80 (1986).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. L. Martin and R. L. Snowdon, Effect of temperature on magnetic shielding with Conetic. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 46:523(1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Y. Suzuki, E. Horikoshi, and K. Niwa, Magnetic properties and ferromagnetic shielding of Ni-Mo-Fe alloys at cryogenic temperatures, Fujitsu Scientific and Technical Journal 20:167 (1984).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    I. B. Goldberg et al, Magnetic susceptibility of inconel alloys 718, 625, and 600 at cryogenic temperatures, in: “Advances in Cryogenic Engineering — Materials,” Vol. 36, Plenum Press, New York (1990), p. 755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Roger J. Hanson and Francis M. Pipkin, Mangetically shielded solenoid with field of high homogeneity, Rev. Sci. Instrum 36:179 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Scott Smith, Private Communication, American Magnetics, Inc. (1991).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brent A. Warner
    • 1
  • Peter J. Shirron
    • 1
  • Stephen H. Castles
    • 1
  • Aristides T. Serlemitsos
    • 1
  1. 1.Cryogenic Systems Development SectionNASA Goddard Space Flight CenterGreenbeltUSA

Personalised recommendations