Abstract
In the traditional view of photoionization of a one-valence-electron atom, the absorption of the photon raises the electron from a bound state into the continuum instantly, so to speak, and irreversibly. There is no characteristic time (analogous to the spontaneous lifetime of a discrete excited state) which we can associate with “how long” the electron “stays” in the continuum energy state to which it was raised. Another side of the same picture is that the dependence of the bound-free matrix element that determines the cross-section on the photon energy is smooth, exhibiting a slow variation originating from the oscillatory behavior of the wavefunctions. It shows no resonance-like structure. The situation changes significantly when the photoabsorption raises two electrons into the continuum. Then we encounter doubly excited discrete states embedded in (degenerate with) the single-electroncontinuum)[1, 2]. The process (at least as long as the field is not too strong) is still irreversible, but there is now a characteristic time which can be viewed as the lifetime of the discrete state that has been formed in the continuum. The dependence of the photoionization cross section on the photon energy is no longer smooth but exhibits maxima and minima reflecting the interference between the amplitudes of the transition to the continuum and discrete parts of the wavefunction. By exciting the appropriate superposition of discrete and continuum wavefunction, we achieve a temporary localization and stabilization of an electron whose energy is above the ionization threshold. These so-called autoionizing states (or resonances) can have lifetimes ranging from less than a pico-second to microseconds, or in rare cases even be metastable against autoionizationl[3], depending on the atom and the configuration.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
U. Fano, Phys. Rev. 124, 1866(1961).
W. E. Cooke, T. F. Gallagher, S. A. Edelstein, and R. M. Hill, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 178(1978); W. E. Cooke and C. L. Cromer, Phys. Rev. A 32, 2725(1985).
C. A. Nicolaides and D. R. Beck, Phys. Rev. A 17, 2116(1978).
Yu.I. Heller and A.K. Popov, Soy. J. Quant. Electron. 6, 606(1976).
Yu.I. Heller and A.K. Popov, Op. Comm. 18, 8 (1976).
Yu.I. Heller and A.K. Popov, Op. Comm. 18, 449 (1976).
Yu.I. Heller and A.K. Popov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 78, 506 (1980), [Soy. Phys. JEPT 51, 255 (1980).
Bo-nian Dai and P. Lambropoulos, Phys. Rev. A36, 5205 (1987).
Yu.I. Heller, V.F. Lukinykh, A.K. Popov and V.V. Slabko, Phys. Lett. A 82, 4 (1981).
For a review see, for example, P.L. Knight, M.A. Lauder, and B.J. Dalton, Phys. Rep. 190, 1 (1990).
L.I. Pavlov, S.S. Dimov, D.I. Metchkov, G.M. Mileva, and K. V. Stamenov, Phys. Lett. 89A, 441 (1982).
S.S. Dimov, L.I.Pavlov, and K.V. Stamenov, Appl. Phys. B 30, 35 (1983).
D. Feldmann, G. Otto, D. Petring and K. H. Welge, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 19, 269 (1986).
M.H.R.Hutchinson and K.M.M. Ness, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 105 (1988).
X. Tang, Anne L’Huillier, and P. Lambropoulos,Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 111 (1989).
K.G.H. Baldwin, P.B. Chapple, H.-A. Bachor, J. Zhang and P. Lambropoulos, Nonlinear Optics, Kauai, HI, 16–20 July, 1990; also P. B. Chapple, Ph.D. thesis, Australian National University, (1988), (unpublished).
J. Zhang, P. Lambropoulos, Phys. Rev. A (to be published).
G. Alber and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. A 26, 1373 (1983).
V. G. Arkhipkin and Yu. I. Heller, Phys. Lett. 98A,12(1983).
S. E. Harris, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62,1033(1989).
A. Lyras, X. Tang, P. Lambropoulos, and J. Zhang, Phys. Rev. A 40, 4131(1989).
A.T. Georges, P. Lambropoulos and J.H. Marburger, Phys. Rev. A, 15, 300 (1977), and references therein.
B. Ritchie, Phys. Rev. A31, 823 (1985).
M. Edwards, X. Tang, P. Lambropoulos, and R. Shakeshaft, Phys. Rev. A33, 4444(1986).
T. N. Chang, Phys. Rev. A39, 4946(1989).
R. T. Hodgson, P. P. Sorokin, and J. J. Wynne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 343(1974).
J. A. Armstrong, and J. J. Wynne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 1183(1974).
Lloyd Armstrong, Jr., and Brian Lee Beers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 1290(1975).
P. Lambropoulos and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. A 24,379(1981).
Y. L. Shao, D. Charalambidis, C. Fotakis, J. Zhang and P. Lambropoulos, Phys. Rev. Lett. (submitted).
S. Cavalieri, Manlio Matera, and Francesco Pavone, Phys. Rev. Lett. (submitted).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lambropoulos, P., Zhang, J., Tang, X. (1992). Coherent Interactions within the Atomic Continuum. In: Bandrauk, A.D., Wallace, S.C. (eds) Coherence Phenomena in Atoms and Molecules in Laser Fields. NATO ASI Series, vol 287. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3364-1_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3364-1_24
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6484-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-3364-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive