New Palaeontological Contributions to Limb Ontogeny and Phylogeny

  • Michael Coates
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 205)

Abstract

Recently, together with my colleague Dr Jennifer Clack, (Coates and Clack,1990) I reported the discovery of polydactylous, Devonian tetrapod limbs: the forelimb of Acanthostega (Jarvik, 1952), and the hindlimb of lchthyostega (Jarvik, 1952,1980). These data, and other recent discoveries of early tetrapod material, combine to produce an almost completely new picture of the emergence of terrestrial vertebrate life. The first aim of this paper is to provide an updated palaeontological data–base for the study of vertebrate limb development.

Keywords

Permian Devonian Crest Rosen Tempo 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, D.T., 1973, “Embryology and phylogeny in annelids and arthropods” O.U.P., Oxford.Google Scholar
  2. Andrews, S.M., and Westoll, T.S., 1970a, The postcranial skeleton of Eusthenopteron foordi Whiteaves, Trans. R. Soc. Edinb., 68: 207–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews, S.M., and Westoll, T.S., 1970b, The postcranial skeleton of rhipidistian fishes excluding Eusthenopteron, Trans. R. Soc. Edinb., 68: 391–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baird, D., 1964, The aistopod amphibians surveyed, Breviora, 206: 1–17.Google Scholar
  5. Beaumont, E.H., 1977, Cranial morphology of the Loxommatidae (Amphibia: Labyrinthodontia), Phil. Trans. R. Soc., B280: 29 –101.Google Scholar
  6. Bjerring, H.C., 1985, Facts and thoughts on piscine phylogeny, in: “Evolutionary Biology of Primitive Fishes,” R.E. Foreman, A. Gorbman, J.M. Dodd, and R. Olsson eds., Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Broom, R., 1913, Origin of the cheiropterygium, Bull. Am. Mus. N. H., 32:453–464.Google Scholar
  8. Carroll, R.L., 1964, Early evolution of the dissorophid amphibians, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard., 131: 163–250.Google Scholar
  9. Carroll, R.L., 1988, “Vertebrate palaeontology and evolution,” W.H. Freeman and Company, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Carroll, R.L. and Gaskill, P., 1978, The Order Microsauria, Mem. Am. Philos. Soc., 126: 1–128.Google Scholar
  11. Coates, M.I. and Clack, J.A., 1990, Polydactyly in the earliest known tetrapod limbs, Nature, 347: 66–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cowie, J.W. and Bassett, M.G., 1990, I.C.S.:I.U.G.S. 1989 Global stratigraphic chart, in:“Palaeobiology, a Synthesis,” D.E.G. Briggs and P.R. Crowther, eds., Blackwell, London.Google Scholar
  13. Dick, J.R.F., 1981, Diplodoselachi woodi gen. et sp. nov., an early Carboniferous shark from the Midland Valley of Scotland, Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. Earth Sci., 72: 99–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dolle, P., Izpisua-Belmonte, J.C., Falkenstein, H., Renucci, A., and Duboule, D., 1989, Coordinate expression of the murine Hox-5complex homeobox-containing genes during limb pattern formation, Nature, 342: 767–772.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Godfrey, S.J., 1989, The postcranial skeletal anatomy of the Carboniferous tetrapod Greererpeton burkemorani Romer 1969, Phil. Trans. R. Soc., B323: 75–133.Google Scholar
  16. Gregory, W.K., 1913, Crossopterygian ancestry of the amphibia, Science, 37: 806.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gregory, W.K. and Raven, H.C., 1941, Studies on the origin and early evolution of paired fins and limbs, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 17: 273–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heaton, M.J. and Reisz, P.R., 1986, Phylogenetic relationships of captorhinomorph reptiles, Can. J. Earth Sci., 23: 402–418.Google Scholar
  19. Hinchliffe, J.R., 1989a, Evolutionary aspects of the developmental mechanisms underlying the patterning of the pentadactyl limb skeleton in birds and other tetrapods, in:“Fortschritte der Zoologie”,35:226–229, H. Splechtna and C.H. Hilgers eds, Gustav Fischer Verlag, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  20. Hinchliffe, J.R., 1989b, Reconstructing the archetype:innovation and conservatism in the evolution and development of the pentadactyl Limb, in: “Complex organismal functions: integration and evolution in vertebrates,” D.B. Wake and G. Roth eds., John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester.Google Scholar
  21. Holmes, R., 1984, The Carboniferous amphibian Proterogyrinus scheeli Romer, and the early evolution of tetrapods, Phil. Trans. R. Soc., B306: 431–527.Google Scholar
  22. Holmgren, N., 1933, On the origin of the tetrapod limb, Acta Zool. (Stockholm).30: 459–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holmgren, N., 1939, Contribution to the question of the origin of the tetrapod limb, Acta Zool. (Stockholml)., 20: 89– 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hook, R.W., 1983, Colosteus scutellus (Newberry), a primitive temnospondyl amphibian from the Middle Pennsylvanian of Linton, Ohio, Am. Mus. Novit., 2770: 1–41.Google Scholar
  25. Hook, R.W. and Baird,D., 1984, Ichthycanthus platypus Cope,1877, reidentified as the Dissorophoid Amphibian Amphibamus Lyelli, J. Paleont., 58: 697 - 702.Google Scholar
  26. Horder, T.J., 1989, Syllabus for an embryological synthesis, in: “Compex organismal functions: integration and evolution in vertebrates,” D.B. Wake and G. Roth eds., John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester.Google Scholar
  27. Jarvik, E., 1952, On the fish-like tail in the ichthyostegid stegocephalians, Meddr. Gronland, 114: 1–90.Google Scholar
  28. Jarvik, E., 1980, “Basic structure and evolution of vertebrates” vol.1, Academic, London.Google Scholar
  29. Lebedev, O.A., 1984, First discovery of a Devonian tetrapod vertebrate in U.S.S.R., Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSR., 278: 1470–1473.Google Scholar
  30. Lebedev, O.A., 1985, The first tetrapod: description and occurrence, Priroda, 1985 (11): 26–36.Google Scholar
  31. Leonardi, G., 1983, Notopus petri nov. gen., nov. sp.,: Une empreinte d’amphibien du Devonien au Parana (Bresil), Geobios, 16: 233–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lewis, J. and Martin, P., 1989, Limbs: a pattern emerges, Nature, 342: 734–735.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Long, J.A., 1989, A new rhizodontiform fish from the Early Carboniferous of Victoria, Australia, with remarks on the phylogenetic position of the group J. Vert. Paleo., 9: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Long, J.A., 1990, Heterochrony and the origin of tetrapods, Lethaia, 23:157–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mc Namara, K.J., 1986, A guide to the nomenclature of heterochrony, J. Paleont., 60: 4–13.Google Scholar
  36. Martyanov, H.E., 1960, Otpechatok pyatepalogo sleda, Priroda, 1960 (9): 115.Google Scholar
  37. Maisey, J.G., 1986, Heads and tails: a chordate phylogeny, Cladistics, 2: 201–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Milner, A.R., Smithson, T.R., Milner, A.C., Coates, M.I., and Rolfe, W.D.I., 1986, The search for early tetrapods, Mod. Geol. 10: 1–28.Google Scholar
  39. Moy-Thomas, J.A. and Miles, R.S., 1971, “Palaeozoic fishes,” Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  40. Oster, G.F., Shubin, N., Murray, J.D. and Alberch,P., 1988, Evolution and morphogenetic rules: The shape of the vertebrate limb in ontogeny and phylogeny, Evolution, 42: 862–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Panchen, A.L., 1982, The use of parsimony in testing phylogenetic hypotheses, Zool. J. Linn. Soc74: 305–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Panchen, A.L. and Smithson, T.R., 1987, Character diagnosis, fossils and the origin of tetrapods, Biol. Rev., 62: 341–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Panchen, A.L. and Smithson, T.R., 1988, The relationships of the earliest tetrapods, in: “The phylogeny and classification of the tetrapods, volume 1: Amphibians, Reptiles, Birds,” M.J. Benton, ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  44. Panchen, A.L. and Smithson, T.R., 1990, The pelvic girdle and hindlimb of Crassigyrinus scoticus (Lydekker) from the Scottish Carboniferous and the origin of the tetrapod pelvic skeleton, Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. Earth Sci., 81: 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Patterson, C.P., 1981, Significance of fossils in determining evolutionary relationships, Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 12: 195–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rackoff, J.S., 1980, The origin of the tetrapod limb and the ancestry of tetrapods, in:“The terrestrial environment and the origin of land vertebrates,” A.L. Panchen ed., Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  47. Romer, A.S., 1966, “Vertebrate Paleontology,” University Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  48. Romer, A.S. and Byrne, F., 1931, The pes of Diadectes: notes on the primitive tetrapod limb, Palaeobiologica, 1931 (IV Band): 25–48.Google Scholar
  49. Rosen, D.E., Forey, P.L., Gardiner, B.G., and Patterson, C.P., 1981, Lungfishes, tetrapods, palaeontology, and plesiomorphy, Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 167: 159–276.Google Scholar
  50. Saunders, J.W., 1977, The experimental analysis of chick limb-bud development, in: “Vertebrate limb and somite morphogenesis,” D.A.Ede, J.R. Hinchliffe, and M. Balls, eds., University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  51. Schultze, H.P., 1987, Dipnoans as sarcopterygians, J. Morph. sup. 1: 39–47.Google Scholar
  52. Shubin, N.H. and Alberch, P., 1986, A morphogenetic approach to the origin and basic organisation of the tetrapod limb, Evol. Biol., 20: 319–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Smithson, T.R., 1985, The morphology and relationships of the Carboniferous amphibian Eoherpeton watsoni Panchen, Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 85:317–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Smithson, T.R., 1989, The earliest known reptile, Nature, 342: 676–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Worobjewa (Vorobyeva), E.I., 1975, Bermerkungen zu Panderichthys rhombolepis (Gross) aus Lode in Lettland (Gaujashchichten, Oberdevon), N. Jarbuch. Geol. Palaont., Monatschafte 1975: 315–320.Google Scholar
  56. Warren, J.W. and Wakefield, N.A., 1972, Trackways of tetrapod vertebrates from the Upper Devonian of Victoria, Australia, Nature, 238: 469–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Warren, A., Jupp, R. and Bolton, B., 1986, Earliest tetrapod trackway, Alcheringa, 10: 183–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wellstead, C.F., 1982, A Lower Carboniferous aistopod amphibian from Scotland, Palaeontoloay, 25: 193–208.Google Scholar
  59. White, T.E., 1939, Osteology of Seymouria baylorensis Broili, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. Harvard, 85: 325–409.Google Scholar
  60. Wiley, E.O., 1981, “Phlogenetics: the theory and practice of phylogenetic systematics,” John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  61. Zangerl, R., 1981, “Chondrichthyes 1. (Paleozoic Elasmobranchii). Handbook of Palaeoichthyology; vol.3,” Fischer, Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Coates
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University Museum of ZoologyCambridgeUK
  2. 2.University of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations