Advertisement

The Interdigital Spaces of the Chick Leg Bud as a Model for Analysing Limb Morphogenesis and Cell Differentiation

  • J. M. Hurle
  • D. Macias
  • Y. Gañan
  • M. A. Ros
  • M. A. Fernandez-Teran
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 205)

Abstract

Normal embryonic development is not a linear process of cell and tissue growth and differentiation (Hurle, 1988). There are many examples in which an early embryonic structure undergoes a reshaping process involving a substantial phenomenon of cell death. In some cases the tissue loss affects to fully formed organs which play a transitory functional role in the developing individual. This is the case of the loss of the tail in the developing anura amphibia during metamorphosis. In other cases cell death appears closely linked to morphogenesis an appears to play an sculpturing role for the achievement of the final shape of a developing structure. This appears to be the case in “interdigital cell death” occurring during morphogenesis of the digits of the amniote embryos.

Keywords

Distal Phalange Micromass Culture Interdigital Space Cartilage Nodule Adjacent Digit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahrens P. B., Solursh, M., Reiter, R. S. (1977).Stage-related capacity for limb chondrogenesis in cell cultures.Dev. Biol., 60: 69–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alberch, P., & Gale, E. A. (1983). Size dependence during the development of the amphibian foot. Cochicine-induced digital loss and reduction. J. Embryol. exp. Morph., 76: 177–197.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Althouse A., L., & Solursh, M. (1987). The detection of a precartilage, blastema specific marker. Dev. Biol.,120: 377–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cameron J. A., & Fallon, J. F. (1977). The absence of cell death during development of free digits in amphibians. Dev. Biol.,55: 331–338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gasseling, M.T., & Saunders, J. W. Jr. (1964). Effect of the “Posterior Necrotic Zone” of the early chick wing bud on the pattern andsymmetry of limb outgrowth.Amer. Zool.,4:303–304.Google Scholar
  6. Hamburger V. & Hamilton, H. L. (1951). A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J. Morphol., 88: 49–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Honig, L. S. & Summerbell, D. (1985). Maps of strength of positional signalling activity in the developing chick wing bud. J. Embryol. exp. Morph., 87: 163–174.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hurle J. M. (1988). Cell death in developing systems. Meth.Achiev.exp. Pathol.vol. 13:Kinetics and Patterns of Necrosis (G. Jasmin ed.) pp 55–86. Karger.Basel.Google Scholar
  9. Hurle J. M., & Gañan, Y. (1986). Interdigital tissue chondrogenesis induced by surgical removal of the ectoderm in the embryonic chick leg bud. J. Embryol. exp.Morph.,94:231–244.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hurle J. M., & Gañan, Y. (1987). Formation of extra-digits induced by surgical removal of the apical ectodermal ridge of the chick embryo leg bud in the stages previous to the onset of interdigital cell death.Anat. Embryol.,176:393–399.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hurle J. M., Gañan, Y, & Macias, D. (1989). Experimental analysis of the in vivo chondrogenic potential of the interdigital mesenchyme of the chick leg bud subjected to local ectodermal removal. Dev. Biol., 132: 368–374.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hurle, J. M., Ros, M. A., Gañan, Y., Macias, D., Chritchlow, M., & Hinchliffe, J. R. (1990). Experimental analysis of the role of ECM in the patterning of the distal tendons of the developing limb bud. Cell Differ. Develop.,30: 97–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ide, H. (1990).Growth and differentiation of limb bud cells in vitro: Implications for limb pattern formation. Develop.Growth Differ., 32: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Meinhardt, H. (1982). Models of biological pattern formation. Academic Press. London.Google Scholar
  15. Oster, G.F., Murray, J. D., & Harris, A. K. (1983). Mechanical aspects of mesenchymal morphogenesis. J. Embryol. exp.Morph.,78: 83–125.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Oster, G.F., Murray, J. D., & Maini, P. K. (1985). A model for chondrogenic condensations in the developing limb: the role of extracellular matrix and cell tractions. J.Embryol.exp.Morph.,89: 93–112.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Oster, G.F., Shubin, N., Murray, J. D. & Alberch, P. (1988). Evolution and morphogenetic rules: the shape of the vertebrate limb in ontogeny and phylogeny. Evolution.,42: 862–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Smith, S. M., Pang, K., Sundin, O., Wedden, S. E., Thaller, C. & Eichele, G. (1989). Molecular approaches to vertebrate limb morphogenesis. Development suppl., 121–131.Google Scholar
  19. Solursh, M. (1984). Ectoderm as a determinant of early tissue pattern in the limb bud. Cell Differ.,15: 17–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Solursh, M., & Reiter, R. S. (1988). Inhibitory and stimulating effects of limb ectoderm on in vitro chondrogenesis. J.exp.Zool., 248: 147–154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Solursh, M., Singley, C. T., & Reiter, R. S. (1981). The influence of epithelia on cartilage and loose connective tissue formation by limb mesenchyme cultures. Dev. Biol., 86: 471–482.Google Scholar
  22. Tickle C. (1980). The polarising region and limb development. In: “Development of Mammals vol. 4 ” (M. H. Johnson ed.) pp. 101–136. Elshevier/North Holland Biomed. Press. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  23. Wolpert L (1971). Positional information and pattern formation. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 6: 183–224.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wolpert, L. (1989). Positional information revisited. Development supp. 3–12.Google Scholar
  25. Wolpert L., & Hornbruch, A (1990). Double anterior chick limb buds and models for cartilage rudiment specification. Development.,109: 961–966.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Zanetti, N., & Solursh, M. (1986). Epithelial effects on limb chondrogenesis involve extracellular matrix and cell shape. Dev.Biol., 113: 110–118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. M. Hurle
    • 1
  • D. Macias
    • 2
  • Y. Gañan
    • 2
  • M. A. Ros
    • 1
  • M. A. Fernandez-Teran
    • 1
  1. 1.Dpto. Anatomia y Biologia CelularU. Cantabria. Spain Facultad de MedicinaSantanderSpain
  2. 2.Dpto. Ciencias MorfologicasU.ExtremaduraSpain

Personalised recommendations