Advertisement

Axial Heat Flow Methods of Thermal Conductivity Measurement for Good Conducting Materials

  • J. M. Corsan

Abstract

The advantages of a longitudinal or axial heat flow method of thermal conductivity measurement over a radial method depend to a large extent on the temperature range to be covered and the types of specimen to be measured. In general, the former technique is more flexible in that a wide range of conductivity values can be covered (e.g., from about 5 W m-1 K-1 to 400 W m-1 K-1 in measurements above ambient temperature) by choosing the diameter of the specimen to suit the conductivity expected, sample preparation is relatively simple, material in rod form is normally readily available, the location of thermocouples in the specimen is easily determined, and suitable reference materials are available to check performance if required.(1-3) On the negative side, heat losses due to radiation are more of a problem at high temperatures although they can usually be kept at a reasonable level if, in the areas where radiation is a problem, the temperatures of any shields are closely matched to the specimen temperature and a suitable insulation (density about 90 kg m-3) is used between the respective parts.

Keywords

Thermocouple Wire Specimen Heater Referenee Material Heater Assembly Vacuum Enclosure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J.G. Hust, “Thermal Conductivity and Electrical Resistivity, Standard Reference Materials: Tungsten (4 to 3000 K),” High Temp. High Pressures 8, 377–390 (1976).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.G. Hust and P.J. Giarratano, “Standard Reference Materials: Thermal Conductivity and Electrical Resistivity, Standard Reference Materials: Austenitic Stainless Steels, SRM 735 and 798, from 4 to 1200 K,” NBS Special Publication 260–45 (1975).Google Scholar
  3. 6.
    M.J. Laubitz, “Measurements of the Thermal Conductivity of Solids at High Temperatures using Steady State Linear and Quasilinear Heat Flow,” p. 111, Ref.4.Google Scholar
  4. 7.
    M.J. Laubitz, “Axial Heat Flow Methods of Measuring Thermal Conductivity,” p. 11, Ref. 5.Google Scholar
  5. 8.
    D.L. McElroy and J.P. Moore, “Radial Heat Flow Methods for the Measurement of the Thermal Conductivity of Solids,” p. 186, Ref. 3.Google Scholar
  6. 9.
    J.P. Moore, “Analysis of Apparatus with Radial Symmetry for Steady State Measurements of Thermal Conductivity,” p. 61, Ref. 5.Google Scholar
  7. 10.
    J.M. Corsan, “A Compact Thermal Conductivity Apparatus for Good Conductors,” J. Phys. E 17, 800–807 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 11.
    R.W. Powell and M.J. Hickman, The Iron and Steel Institute, Second Report of the Alloy Steels Research Committee, Part 3, Special Report 24, Section 9, Part 3, pp. 215–251 (1939).Google Scholar
  9. 12.
    R.W. Powell and R.P. Tye, Thermal and Electrical Conductivities of Nickel-chromium (Nimonic) Alloys,” Engineer 209, 729–732 (1960).Google Scholar
  10. 13.
    J.E. Connett and J.M. Corsan, “Thermal Conductivity of a Titanium-Aluminium-Vanadium Alloy,” CHEMPOR 85 Conference Proceedings, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal, April 15–19, Section 31/1 (1985).Google Scholar
  11. 14.
    P. Van Hecke and L. Van Gerven, “A High Performance DC Electronic Regulation System for Temperature Stabilization,” Cryogenics 10, 386–388 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 15.
    T.D.W. Watson and H.E. Robinson, “Thermal Conductivity of some Commercial Iron-Nickel Alloys.” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 403–408 (1961).Google Scholar
  13. 16.
    N.A. Burley, in: Temperature: Its Measurement and Control in Science and Industry, Vol. 4, Part 3, (Ed. H. H. Plumb), pp. 1677–1695, Instrument Society of America, Pittsburgh, PA 15222 (1972).Google Scholar
  14. 17.
    N.A. Burley, R.L. Powell, G.W. Burns, and M.G. Scroger, “The Nicrosil versus Nisil Thermocouple: Properties and Thermoelectric Reference Data.” NBS Monograph 161, CODEN: NBSMA6, U.S. Department of Commerce/National Bureau of Standards, Washington, USA (1978).Google Scholar
  15. 18.
    T.J. Quinn, in: Temperature, Monograph in Physical Measurements (A.H. Cook, ed.), Academic Press, London and New York (1983).Google Scholar
  16. 19.
    “Manual on the use of Thermocouples in Temperature Measurement,” ASTM Special Technical Publication 470B, American Society for Testing and Materials, Publ. Code 04–470020–40 (1981).Google Scholar
  17. 20.
    C.S. Smith and E.W. Palmer, “Thermal and Electrical Conductivities of Copper Alloys,” Trans. Am. Inst. Miner. Metall. Eng. 117, 225–243 (1935).Google Scholar
  18. 21.
    R.W. Powell, “Correlation of Metallic Thermal and Electrical Conductivities for both Solid and Liquid Phases,” Int. J. Mass Heat Transfer 8, 1033–1045 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. M. Corsan
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Quantum MetrologyNational Physical LaboratoryTeddington, MiddlesexEngland

Personalised recommendations