Skip to main content

Abstract

Electrical testing is used throughout the multichip module fabrication process to verify the quality of each processing step and component which goes into the module. Once module assembly is complete, a final test is performed to make sure that the module functions to its specifications. It is desirable to locate any faults as early in the manufacturing process as possible since this results in a lower overall cost. Testing can be divided into three basic areas: substrate test, integrated circuit (IC) test and module test. Substrates are tested during fabrication and prior to component attach. ICs and other components are tested prior to mounting on the substrate. The assembled module is tested prior to final sealing to permit repair of faulty components.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kryterion 4000 Specifications, Everett/Charles Test Equipment, Inc., Pomona, CA,Document Number 8803–10M, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  2. “Cofired Ceramic Multichip Module Design Guide,” Alcoa Electronic Packaging, Inc., San Diego, CA, Rev. 91–08, Aug. 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. J. Webb, “Non-Contact Coupling Plate for Circuit Board Tester,” U.S. Patent Number 3,975,680, Issued Aug. 17, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. F. Spence, “Capacitive Continuity Testing of Multilayer Hybrid Substrates: Its Capabilities and Limitations,” Proc. of the 1985 Intl. Symp. on Microelect., pp. 174–182, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. P. burr, et al., “Method and Apparatus for Testing of Electrical Interconnection Networks,” U.S. Patent Number 4,565,966, Issued Jan. 21, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Lin, “Computer Solutions of the Traveling Salesman Problem,” Bell System Technical J., vol. 44, pp. 2245–2269, 1965.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Michael Gamy, David Johnson, Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness, New York: Freeman, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. A. Conti and P. Hohne-Kranz, “Advantages of Moving Probe Testers Compared to Fixtured Systems,” IPC 31st Annual Meeting, (Lincolnwood, IL), Technical Paper IPC-TP-679, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. A. Moran, T. C. Russell, “Testing Process for Electronic Devices,” U.S. Patent Number 5,023,557, Issued Jun. 11, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Z. Yen, et al. “A Multi-Chip Module Substrate Testing Algorithm,” Proc. of the Fourth Annual IEEE Intl. ASIC Conf. and Exhibit, pp. 9–4.1–4, Sept. 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. D. Golladay, et al., “Electron-Beam Technology for Open/Short Testing of Multi-Chip Substrates,” IBM J. of Res. and Dev., vol. 34, no. 2/3, pp. 250–259, Mar./May 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. O. C. Woodard Sr., et al., “Voltage Contrast Electron Beam Tester for Testing Unpopulated Multichip Modules,” Proc. of the 1990 Intl. Symp. on Microelect., pp. 370–377, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corp., 12100-A Technology Blvd., Austin, TX, a consortium of high technology companies, has hosted several workshops on the acquisition of known good die.

    Google Scholar 

  14. IEEE Standard 1149.1–1990, IEEE Standard Test Access Port and Boundary-Scan Architecture, New York: IEEE Standards Board, May, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  15. L. Whetsel, “Event Qualification: A Gateway to At-Speed System Testing,” Proc. of the 1990 Intl. Test Conf, pp. 135–141, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  16. B. Koenemann, G. Zwiehoff, and R. Bosch, ‘Built-In Testing: State-of-the-Art,“ Proc. of the 1983 Curriculum for Test Tech. Conf, pp. 83–89, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  17. E. J. McCluskey, “Built-In-Self-Test Techniques,” and “Built-In-Self-Test Structures,” IEEE Design & Test, pp. 21–36, Apr. 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Abramovici, M. A. Breuer, and A. D. Friedman, Digital Systems Testing and Testable Design, New York: W. H. Freeman and Company, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Parametric measurements are defined in most digital data books. See: Advanced CMOS Logic Data Book, Texas Instruments, 1990, pp. 1.6–9 as an example.

    Google Scholar 

  20. T. Tada, et al., “A Fine Pitch Probe Technology for VLSI Wafer Testing,” Proc. of the 1990 Intl. Test Conf, pp. 900–906, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. P. Atahn, D. C. Keezer and J. McKinley, “High Frequency Wafer Probing and Power Supply Resonance Effects,” Proc. of the 1991 Intl. Test Conf, pp. 1069–1072. 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  22. T. C. Chung, D. A. Gibson and P. B. Wesling, “TAB Testing and Bum-in,” Handbook of Tape Automated Bonding, J.H. Lau, ed., New York: Springer Science+Business Media New York, 1992, pp. 243–304.

    Google Scholar 

  23. G. Coors and R. Buck, “Pad Array Carriers—The Surface Mount Alternative,” Proc. of the 1991 Intl. Elect. Packaging Conf., pp. 373–389, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  24. D. J. Klinger, Y. Nakada and M. A. Menendez, AT&T Reliability Manual, New York: Springer Science+Business Media New York, 1990, p. 44.

    Google Scholar 

  25. D. Romanchik, “Burn-In: Still a Hot Topic,” Test & Measurement World, pp. 51–54, Jan. 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  26. MIL-STD-883C—Test Methods and Procedures for Microelectronics, Alexandria, VA: National Technical Information Service, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  27. J. Reedholm and T. Turner, “Wafer-Level Reliability,” Microelect. Manuf. Tech., pp. 28–32, Apr. 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  28. P. T. Wagner, “Interconnect Testing with Boundary Scan,” Proc. of the 1987 Intl. Test Conf, pp. 52–57, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  29. C. M. Maunder and R. E. Tulloss, eds., The Test Access Port and Boundary Scan Architecture, Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1990, pp. 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  30. N. Jarwala, C. W. Yau, “A New Framework for Analyzing Test Generation and Diagnosis Algorithms for Board Interconnects,” Proc. of the 1990 Intl. Test Conf, pp. 565–571, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  31. P. Hansen, “Taking Advantage of Boundary-Scan in Loaded-Board Testing,” The Test Access Port and Boundary Scan Architecture, C. M. Maunder and R. E. Tulloss, eds., Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1990, pp. 81–96.

    Google Scholar 

  32. C. W. Yau and N. Jarwala, “The Boundary-Scan Master: Target Applications and Functional Requirements,” Proc. of the 1990 Intl. Test Conf, pp. 311–315, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Daryl Ann Doane Paul D. Franzon

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Russell, T.C., Wen, Y. (1993). Electrical Testing of Multichip Modules. In: Doane, D.A., Franzon, P.D. (eds) Multichip Module Technologies and Alternatives: The Basics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3100-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3100-5_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-442-01236-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-3100-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics