Abstract
Dose-response models for cancer risk assessment can be classified broadly into two categories. The first class of models to be considered included statistical models that were constructed as empirical descriptions of the dose-response curve in the observed range of data. While these models have good statistical properties and are generally easy to use, they are not based on knowledge of cancer mechanisms and are, thus, unsuited to addressing two of the fundamental problems of cancer risk assessment, namely the problems of low-dose and inter-species extrapolation. It appears reasonable to assume that incorporation of knowledge of cancer mechanisms into dose-response models will lead to more meaningful extrapolations. To that end, various attempts have been made to develop biologically-based dose-response models for cancer risk assessment. Success has been modest, at best. The problem is that, even if the broad features of the model of carcinogenesis are correct, slight mis-specification of the model can lead to large errors in the extrapolation. Thus, in my opinion, models of carcinogenesis have been more useful from the scientific point of view, i.e., in providing a framework within which the process of carcinogenesis can be viewed, than for risk assessment. Nevertheless, their use in risk assessment must be explored thoroughly because only through incorporation of sound biological principles into dose-response modelling is there any hope of a rational approach to the extrapolation problems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Armitage, P., Doll, R. The age distribution of cancer and multi-stage theory of carcinogenesis. Br. J. Cancer, 8:1–12, 1954.
Ashley, D.J.B. Colonic Cancer arising in polyposis coli. J Med Gen 6:376–378, 1969.
Kinzler, L.W., Nilbert, M.C., Su, L.K., Vogelstein, B., et al. Identification of FAP locus genes from chromosome Sq21. Science, 253:661–664, 1991.
Knudson, A.G. Mutation and cancer: Statistical study of retinoblastoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci. USA 68:820–823, 1971.
Lipkin, M. Biomarkers of increased susceptibility to gastrointestinal cancer: New application to studies of cancer prevention in human subjects. Cancer Research 48:235–245, 1988.
Moolgavkar, S.H., Cross, F.T., Luebeck, G., Dagle, G.E. A two-mutation model for radon induced lung tumors in rats. Radiation Research 121:28–37, 1990.
Moolgavkar, S.H., Knudson, A.G. Mutation and cancer: A model for human carcinogenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst 66:1037–1052, 1981.
Moolgavkar, S.H., Luebeck, E.G. Multistage Carcinogenesis: Population-based model for colon cancer. J Nail Cancer Inst, 84: 610–618, 1992.
Moolgavkar, S.H., Luebeck, E.G. Two-event model for carcinogenesis: Biological, mathematical, and statistical considerations. Risk Analysis 10:323–341,1990.
Nishisho, I., Nakamura, Y., Miyoshi, Y., Mild, Y., et al. Mutations of chromosome Sq21 genes in FAP colorectal cancer patients. Science, 253:665–669, 1991.
Preston-Martin, S., Pike, M.C., Ross, R.K., Jones, P.A., Henderson, B.E. Increased cell division as a cause of human cancer. Cancer Res 50:7415–7421, 1990.
Veale, A.M.O. Intestinal Polyposis. Eugenics Laboratory Memoirs, No. 40, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1965.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moolgavkar, S.H. (1992). Pharmacodynamic Models for Cancer Risk Assessment. In: Zervos, C. (eds) Oncogene and Transgenics Correlates of Cancer Risk Assessments. NATO ASI Series, vol 232. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3056-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-3056-5_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6333-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-3056-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive