Advertisement

U.S. Technological Initiatives for Courseware Portability

  • J. D. Fletcher
Part of the Defense Research Series book series (DRSS, volume 4)

Abstract

Suppose for the sake of illustration, automobile ownership was complicated by requiring every one of the 40–50 makes of automobiles commonly found on our streets to use a unique type of gasoline, so that a Buick would run poorly, if at all, on fuel intended for a Chevrolet, a Dodge would run poorly on fuel intended for a Lincoln, and so on. What sort of impact would this state of affairs have?

Keywords

Service Group Military Training Device Driver Portability Standard Interactive Videodisc 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown, P.J. (1977) Software Portability. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Collis, B.A., & De Diana, I. (1990) The impact of different portability factors during the life cycle of an educational software adaptation project. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 23, 306–317.Google Scholar
  3. Corno, L., & Snow, R.E. (1986). Adapting teaching to individual differences among learners. In M.C. Witzrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (Third Edition). New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Dahlstrand, I. (1984) Software Portability and Standards. Chichester, United Kingdom: Ellis Norwood Ltd.Google Scholar
  5. Dodds, P., Lewis, S., McFarling, D., Mistrot, H., Snowman, G., and Spiegelberg, J. (1990) Recommended Practices for Multimedia Portability. Release R 1.1. Washington, DC: The Interactive Multimedia Association.Google Scholar
  6. Fletcher, J.D. (1990). Effectiveness and Cost of Interactive Videodisc Instruction in Defense Training and Education (IDA Paper P-2372). Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses.Google Scholar
  7. Fletcher, J.D., Bosco, J., Wienclaw, R., Ashcraft, J.K., and Boycan, G. (1991) Assessment of Department of Defense Job Skill Enhancement Programs (IDA Document D-939). Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses.Google Scholar
  8. Kulik, C-L.C. and Kulik, J.A. (1986) Effectiveness of Computer-Based Education in Colleges. AEDS Journal 19, 81–108.Google Scholar
  9. Kulik, C-L.C., Kulik, J.A., and Shwalb, B. (1986) Effectiveness of computer-based instruction in adult education. Journal of Educational Computing Research 2, 235–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lecarme, O., Pellissier-Gan, M., and Gart, M. (1989) Software Portability with Microcomputer Issues. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  11. Lewis, D.S. (1991) Introducing the IMA recommended practices for multimedia portability. In P.V.W. Dodds (Ed.), IMA Compatibility Project Proceedings Washington, DC: The Interactive Multimedia Association.Google Scholar
  12. Orlansky, J. and String, J. (1977). Cost effectiveness of computer-based instruction in military training (IDA Paper P-1375). Arlington, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses.Google Scholar
  13. Schneeman, R.D. (1991) Interactive video software portability: Migrating a MS-DOS application to POSIX. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Technical Symposium, Advanced Information Interfaces: Making Data Accessible. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology and Washington DC Chapter of the Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar
  14. U.S. Department of Defense (1990). Military Manpower Training Report: FY 1991. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  15. U.S. Department of Defense (1990). Military Standard 1379D: Military Training Programs. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  16. U.S. Department of Defense (1991). DoD Instruction 1322.20: Development and Management of Interactive Courseware (ICW) for Military Training. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  17. Vinsonhaler, J.F., & Bass, R.K. (1972). A summary of ten major studies on CAI drill and practice. Educational Technology 12, 29–32.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. D. Fletcher
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Defense AnalysesAlexandriaUSA

Personalised recommendations