Analytical Methods for Optimizing Knowledge-Based Information Structures in Simulation-Based Training

  • Bernhard Zimolong
  • Udo Konradt
Part of the Defense Research Series book series (DRSS, volume 4)


For obvious reasons, computer-aided instructions (CAI), training methods and intelligent tutoring systems, e.g. expert systems, are used to assist teachers in performing their tasks and functions. The extent to which it would be useful and desirable to replace a human teacher completely depends on the task to be accomplished, a problem which will be discussed at the end of this paper.


Expert System Knowledge Acquisition Knowledge Structure Knowledge Engineer Personal Construct 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bainbridge, L., 1979, Verbal reports as evidence of the process operator’s knowledge, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 11, 411–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bereiter, S. R., and Miller, S. M., 1989, A field based study of troubleshooting in computercontrolled manufacturing systems, IEEE-SMC, 19, 205–219.Google Scholar
  3. Berry, D. C., 1987, The problem of implicit knowledge, Expert Systems, 4, 144–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonato, M., 1988, Knowledge elicitation with structure formation techniques, In: J. Diederich, and T. Uthmann, (ed.), Knowledge Acquisition, Arbeitspapier No. 281. St. Augustin, GMD.Google Scholar
  5. Boose, J., 1985, A knowledge acquisition program for expert systems based on personal construct theory, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 20, 21–43.Google Scholar
  6. Boose, J., 1986, Rapid acquisition and combination of knowledge from multiple experts in the same domain, Future Computing Systems, 1, 191–216.Google Scholar
  7. Boose, J., and Bradshaw, J., 1987, Expertise transfer and complex problems: Using AQUINAS as a knowledge-acquisition workbench for knowledge-based systems, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 26, 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Breuker, J. A., and Wielenga, B. J., 1987, Use of models in the interpretation of verbal data, In: A. Kidd, (ed.), Knowledge acquisition for expert systems, New York, Plenum.Google Scholar
  9. Breuker, J. A., Wielinga, B. W., van Someren, M., de Hoog, R., Schreiber, G., De Greef, P., Bredeweg, B., Wielemaker, J., Billaut, J., Davoodo, M., Hayward, S., 1988, Modeldriven knowledge acquisition: interpretation models, Deliverable task Al, Esprit Project 1098, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  10. Carbonell, J. R., 1970, Al in CAI: An artificial intelligence approach to computer aided instruction, IEEE Transactions on Man-Machine Systems, 11, 190–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Can, B., and Goldstein, I., 1977, Overlays: A theory of modeling for computer aided instruction, Cambridge, Mass., Al Laboratory, MIT.Google Scholar
  12. Clancey, W. J., 1985, Heuristic classification, Artificial Intelligence, 27,209–350.Google Scholar
  13. Cordingley, E. S., 1989, Knowledge elicitation techniques for knowledge-based systems, In: D. Diaper, (ed.), Knowledge Elicitation, Ellis Norwood, Chicester, 89–175.Google Scholar
  14. Davies, M., and Hakiel, S., 1988, Knowledge harvesting: A practical guide to interviewing, Expert Systems, 5, 42–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davis, R., 1983, Interactive transfer of expertise, In: E. H. Shortliffe, and B. Buchanan, (ed.), Rule-based expert systems: the MYCIN experiments, Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  16. Diederich, J., Ruhmann, I., and May, M., 1986, KRITON: A knowledge acquisition tool for expert systems, Proceedings of the Knowledge Acquisition for KBS Workshop, Banff, Canada.Google Scholar
  17. Eberts, R. E., and Brock, J. F. 1987, Computer-Assisted and Computer-Managed Instruction, In: G. Salvendy, (ed.), Handbook of Human Factors, New York, Wiley, 976–1011.Google Scholar
  18. Ericsson, K. A., and Simon, H. A., 1985, Protokoll analysis: Verbal report as data, London, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Fransella, F., and Bannister, D., 1977, A manual for repertory grid technique, London, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gaines, B. R., 1987, Rapid prototyping for expert systems, In: M. Oliff, (ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Expert systems and the Leading Edge in Productions, Planning, and Control.Google Scholar
  21. Gaines, B. R., and Shaw, M., 1986, Induction of inference rules for expert systems, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 18, 315–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Garg-Janardan, C., and Salvendy, G., 1987, A conceptual framework for knowledge elicitation, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 26, 521–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Garg-Janardan, C., Eberts, R.E., Zimolong, B., Nof, S. Y., Salvendy, G., 1987, Expert Systems, In: G. Salvendy, (ed.), Handbook of human factors, New York, Wiley, 1130–1176.Google Scholar
  24. Hacker, W., 1986, Arbeitspsychologie, Bern, Huber.Google Scholar
  25. Hoffman, R. R., 1986, Procedures for efficently extracting the knowledge of experts, Technical Report, Office of Scientific Research, Bolling Air Force Base, Zit. In: Hoffman, R. R., 1987, The problem of extracting the knowledge of experts from the perspective of experimental psychology, AI Magazine, 8, 53–67.Google Scholar
  26. Kelly, G. A., 1955, The psychology of personal constructs. Vols. 1 and 2, New York, Norton.Google Scholar
  27. Kitto, C. M., and Boose, J. H., 1987, Heuristics for expertise transfer: An implementation of a dialog manager for knowledge acquisition, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 26, 183–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Klein, G. A., 1987, Applications of analogic reasoning, Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 2, 201–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Konradt, U., Strwter, O.,1990, Ein computergestuetztes Strukturlegeverfahren zur Akquisition von Diagnosestrategien in komplexen Arbeitssituationen, Unpublished paper, Lehrstuhl fuer Arbeits-und Organisationspsychologie, University of Bochum.Google Scholar
  30. Konradt, U., and Zimolong, B., 1990, Die Analyse von Diagnosestrategien bei Wartungs-und Instandsetzungsaufgaben in flexiblen Fertigungsstruktu-ren, In: D. Frey, (ed.), Bericht Ueber den 37. Kongress der DGfP in Kiel 1990, Hogrefe, Gcettingen, 322.Google Scholar
  31. Laur-Ernst, U., 1986, Mit CNC-Simulation lernen - Mceglichkeiten und Grenzen, In: M. Hoppe, and H.-H. Erbe, (ed.), Rechnergest Uetzte Facharbeit, 106–118. Wetzlar, W. v. Siemens-Schule.Google Scholar
  32. Linstone, H. A., and Turoff, M., 1975, (ed.), The dephi method, London, Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  33. McCarthy, J., 1968, Programming with common sense, In: M. Minsky, (ed.), Semantic information processing, 403–418, Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. Meyer, N., 1987, Neue Anforderungen an die Ausbilder, In: 2. Fachtagungsbericht aus dem Forschungsprojekt “Mikroelektronik und berufliche Bildung – Gesamtauswertung”, Fachtagung am 15. und 16. Oktober 1987 im Wissenschaftszentrum in Bonn “Innovation und Qualifikation”, Fraunhofer-Institut fuer Arbeitswirtschaft und Organisation (IAO), 1987.Google Scholar
  35. Musen, M. A., 1989, Automated generation of model-based knowledge acquisition tools, London, Pitman.Google Scholar
  36. O’Keefe, R. M., Balci, O., and Smith, E. P.,1987, Validating expert system performance, IEEE Expert, 2, 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. O’Leary, T. J., Goul, M., Moffitt, K. E., and Radwan, A. E., 1990, Validating expert systems, IEEE Expert, 5, 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Olson, J., and Rueter, H. H., 1987, Extracting expertise from experts: Methods for knowledge acquisition, Expert Systems, 4, 152–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Oswald, M., and Gardenne, V., 1984, Wissen, Koennеn und kuenstliche Intelli-genz, Sprache & Kognition, 3, 173–184.Google Scholar
  40. Raen, J., 1983, Skills, rules and knowledge, signals, signs and symbols and other distinctions in human performance models, IEEE-SMC, 13, 257–266.Google Scholar
  41. Rothe, H.-J., Timpe, K.-P., and Warning, J., 1990, Methodenkritische Analyse der Erfassbarkeit von Fachwissen, Unpublished paper, Humboldt-University, Berlin.Google Scholar
  42. Scheele, B., and Groeben, N., 1984, Die Heidelberger Struktur-Lege-Technik (SLT), Eine Dialog-Konsens-Methode zur Erhebung subjektiver Theorien mittlerer Reichweite, Weinheim, Beltz.Google Scholar
  43. Schvaneveldt, R. W., Durso, F. T., Goldsmith, T. E., Breen, T. J., Cooke, N. M., Tucker, R. G., and DeMaio, J. C., 1985, Measuring the structure of expertise, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 23, 699–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shaw, M. L., 1988, Problems of validation in a knowledge acquisition system using multiple experts, In: J. Boose, B. Gaines, and M. Linster, (ed.), Proceedings of the European Knowledge Akquisition Workshop, Sankt Augustin, GMD, 5–1–5–15.Google Scholar
  45. Shaw, M. L., and Gaines, B. R., 1987, An interactive knowledge-elicitation technique using personal construct technology, In: A. Kidd, (ed.), Knowledge acquisition for experts systems. A practical handbook, Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  46. Shortliffe, E. H., 1976, Computer-based medical consultations: MYCIN, New York, Elsevier.Google Scholar
  47. Sonntag, K., 1985, Qualifikationsanforderungen im Werkzeugmaschinenbereich, In: K. Sonntag, (ed.), Neue Produktionstechniken und qualifizierte Arbeit, koeln, Wirtschaftsverlag Bachem, 81–100.Google Scholar
  48. Sonntag, K. H., 1989, Trainingsforschung in der Arbeitspsychologie, Bern, Huber.Google Scholar
  49. Tergan, S.-O., 1989, Psychologische Grundlagen der Erfassung individueller Wissensreprwsentationen, Tеil I: Grundlagen der Wissensmodellierung, Sprache und Kognition, 8, 152–165.Google Scholar
  50. Timpe, K.-P., 1990, Experimentalpsychologie und technische Wissensverarbeitung - psychologische Aspekte bei der Entwicklung von Expertensystemen, Unpublished paper, Humboldt-University Berlin.Google Scholar
  51. Welbank, M., 1987, Knowledge acquisition: a survey and British telecom experience, In: T. Addis, J. Boose, and B. Gaines, (ed.), Proceedings of the First European Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition for knowledge-Based systems, Reading Unversity.Google Scholar
  52. Zimolong, B., 1990, Fehler und Zuverlæssigkeit, In: C. Graf Hoyos, and B. Zimolong, (ed.), Enzyklopædie der Psychologie, vol. 2: Ingenieurpsychologie, Gaettingen, Hogrefe, 313–345.Google Scholar
  53. Zimolong, B., Gottlieb, W., and Rosemann, B., 1988, Ziele und Aufgaben psychologischen Handelns in der Praxis. Tradition und neue Trends, In: E. Frieling, and F. Ruppert, (ed.), Psychologisches Handeln in Organisationen und Betrieben, Bern, Huber, 22–42.Google Scholar
  54. Zimolong, B., and Konradt, U., 1990, Arbeitsbericht zum Forschungsvorhaben Entwicklung eines Ratgebersystems fuer die Stoerfalldiagnose in flexiblen Fertigungsstrukturen, SFB 187: Project A-2, University of Bochum.Google Scholar
  55. Zimolong, B. and Konradt, U., 1991, Diagnosis strategies of maintenance personel in flexible advanced manufacturing structures, In: H.-J. Bullinger (ed.), Human Aspects in Computing, Amsterdam, Elesevier, 1051–1055.Google Scholar
  56. Zimolong, B., Nof, S. Y., Eberts, R.E., and Salvendy, G., 1987, On the limits of expert systems and engineering models in process control, Behavior and Information Technology, 6, 15–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernhard Zimolong
    • 1
  • Udo Konradt
    • 1
  1. 1.Lehrstuhl für Arbeits- und OrganisationspsychologieUniversity of BochumBochumGermany

Personalised recommendations