Skip to main content

An Invitation to Interfield Science

  • Chapter
Annals of Theoretical Psychology

Part of the book series: Annals of Theoretical Psychology ((AOTP,volume 9))

  • 45 Accesses

Abstract

We would first like to say that we are extremely gratified as much by the vigor and vitality of our commentators’ responses as by their material contributions to the theoretical basis of two disciplines, the history of psychology and psychology as a whole. Before replying to individuals, we feel that some clarification of our position in this dialogue is in order. We are, first and foremost, historians of psychology rather than philosophers of psychology. As such, we come from a tradition which takes a very broad view of the discipline of psychology (we strive for inclusivity) and at the same time one which has been, historically, relatively noncommittal in its adherence to any particular philosophy of history or science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ash, M.G. (1987). Introduction. In M.G. Ash &W.R. Woodward (Eds.), Psychol ogy in twentieth-century thought and society (pp. 1–11). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belenky, M.F., Clinchy, B.M., Goldberger, N.R., &Tarule, J.M. (1986). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck-Morse, S. (1979). Socioeconomic bias in Piaget’s theory: Implications for cross-cultural studies. In. A.R. Buss (Ed.), Psychology in social context (pp. 349–363). New York: Irvington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P.M. (1981). Eliminative materialism and the propositional attitude. The Journal of Philosophy, 78,67–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claparede, E. (1913). Experimental pedagogy and the psychology of the child (Trans. from 4th ed., 1911, M. Louch &H. Holman). London, Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claperede, E. (1917). La psychologie de Pintelligence, Scientia, 11 ,353–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coon, D.J. (1989). Courtship with anarchy: The socio-political foundations of William James’s pragmatism and radical empiricism. Dissertation, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick, F.H.C. (1986). Certain aspects of the anatomy and physiology of the cerebral cortex. In J.L. McClelland, D.E. Rumelhart &the PDP Research Group (1986). Parallel distributed processing. Explorations in the micro structures of cognition. Vol.2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger,K. (1990). Constructing the subject. Historical origins of psychological research. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Devonis, D. (1989). The concept of conscious pleasure in the history of modern American psychology. Dissertation, University of New Hampshire.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberger, H. (1970). The discovery of the unconscious. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.A., &Pylyshyn, Z.W. (1988). Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition, 28 ,3–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, H., &Voneche, J. (1977). The essential Piaget. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S., &Hintikka, M. (1983). Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • High, R., &Woodward, W.R. (1980). William James and Gordon Allport: Parallels in their maturing conceptions of self and personality. In R. W. Rieber &K. Salzinger (Eds.), Psychology: Theoretical and historical perspectives (pp. 57–80). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, E.B. (1915). The Freudian wish and its place in ethics. New York: Henry Holt &Co.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890/1981). Principles of psychology , in The works of William James (Intro, by G. Myers &R. Evans). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaynes, J., &Woodward, W.R. (1974). In the shadow of the Enlightenment: I. Reimarus against the Epicureans. II. Remiarus and his theory of drives. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 10 ,3–15, 144–159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leahey, T. (1980/1987). A history of psychology. Main currents of psychological thought (lst/2nd eds.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maull, N. (1977). Unifying science without reduction. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 9 ,142–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, R. (1975). The persistent problems of psychology. Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, R.N. (1986). Intertheoretic relations and the future of psychology. Philosophy of Science, 53 ,179–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, J. (1979). The crisis ofexperimentalism in the 1920s: E.G. Boring and his uses of history. American Psychologist, 34 ,280–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget(1950). Introduction a l’épistĂ©mologie gĂ©netique (Vols. 1–3). Paris: Presses Universitire de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, J.C. (1988). Introduction. In J.C. Pitt (Ed.), Theories of explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postman, L. (1947). The history and present status of the law of effect. Psychological Bulletin, 44 ,488–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R.J. (1987). Appendix 1. The natural selection model and other models in the historiography of science. Darwin and the emergence of evolutionary theories of mind and behavior (pp. 549–594). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J., &Woodward, W.R. (1980). The convergence of behavioral biology and operant psychology: Toward an interlevel and interfield science. The Behavnor Analyst ,72, 131–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, C, &Rappard, J.F.H. van (1982). Tussen ontwerpen werkelijkheid. Een visie op de psychologic. Amsterdam: Boom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakow, D., &Rapaport, D. (1964). The influence of Freud on American psychol ogy.New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staats, A.W. (1983). Psychology’s crisis of disunity: Philosophy and method for a unified science. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E.L. (1898/1911). Animal intelligence. An experimental study of the associative process. Animal intelligence: Experimental studies. (pp. 20– 155) New York: Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E.L. (1905/1907). The elements of psychology. New York: A.G. Seiler.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, E.L. (1908). A pragmatic substitute for free will. Essays philosophical and psychological in honor of William James (pp. 585–610). New York: Longmans, Green &Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, E.C. (1945). A stimulus-expectancy need-cathexis psychology. Science ,101 ,160–166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, E.C. (1966). Behavior and psychological man. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal, F. (1987). Jean Piaget and the liberal Protestant tradition. In M.G. Ash &W.R. Woodward, Psychology in twentieth century thought and society ,(pp. 271–294).

    Google Scholar 

  • Viney, W. (1989). The Cyclops and the twelve-eyed toad: William James and the unity-disunity problem in psychology. American Psychologist, 44 ,1261– 1265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, W.R. (1972). Fechner’s panpsychism: A scientific solution to the mind-body problem. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 8 ,367–386.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, W.R. (1979). Young Piaget revisited. Genetic Psychology Monographs,99 ,131–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, W.R. (1982a). The ’discovery’ of social behaviorism and social learning theory. American Psychologist, 37 ,396–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, W.R. (1982b). Stretching the limits of psychology’s history. In W.R. Woodward &M.G. Ash (Eds.), The problematic science: Psychology in nineteenth-century thought (pp. 1–16). New York: Praeger &Westport, CT: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, W. R. (1982c). Wundt’s program for the new psychology: Vicissitudes of experiment, theory, and system. In W.R. Woodward &M.G. Ash (Eds.), The problematic science (pp. 167–197). New York: Praeger &Westport, CT: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, W.R. (1983). Introduction. In F. Burkhardt (Ed.), The works of William James. Essays in psychology (pp. xi-xxxix). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, W.R. (1984). William James’s psychology of will: Its revolutionary impact on American psychology. In J. Brozek (Ed.), Explorations in the history of psychology in the United States (pp. 148–195). Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, W.R. (1987). Conclusion: Professionalization, rationality, and political linkages in twentieth-century psychology. In M.G. Ash, &W.R. Woodward (Eds.), Psychology in twentieth-century thought and society (pp. 295–310). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, W.R. (In press). Stevens, Stanley Smith. In F.L. Holmes (Ed.), Dictionary of scientific biography Supplement. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Devonis, D.C., Woodward, W.R. (1993). An Invitation to Interfield Science. In: Rappard, H.V., Van Strien, P.J., Mos, L.P., Baker, W.J. (eds) Annals of Theoretical Psychology. Annals of Theoretical Psychology, vol 9. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2986-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2986-6_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6300-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-2986-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics