History and System

  • Hans V. Rappard
Part of the Annals of Theoretical Psychology book series (AOTP, volume 9)

Summary

This paper aims at presenting the outline of an integrated view of history of psychology and theoretical psychology. First, Madsen’s conception of theoretical psychology as meta-psychology is introduced. Although some details are criticized, the general view is accepted. Madsen’s theoretical psychology aims at contributing to systematology, that is, a general meta-theory of psychology. However, systematology is reinterpreted as systematization of psychological theories. In this connection the paper deals with the current issue of the unification of psychology. Systematology -as-systematization is argued to differ from unification in that it entails a plurality of theories instead of one theory by means of which unification is to be achieved. Second, the paper deals with the question of what is a (psychological) system ideally. According to some authors, a system involves as a first step an ‘ontological legislation. This view is clarified by means of a hermeneutical interpretation of the phenomenological concept of essence. According to this interpretation essence entails the founding definition of a (psychological) knowledge domain. Third, it is suggested that the history of psychology may be conceived of as a process of phenomenological ‘variation’. From this point of view, history cannot yet be said to have determined the ‘essentials of psychology’ and hence there seem to be as yet no founding definitions of the discipline. However, it is argued that historical research has pointed out elements of at least two such definitions, which are identified with the so-called Lockian and Leibnizian traditions. Next, these two tradition are linked to a multi-level conception of the discipline and it is argued that the Lockian and Leibnizian traditions correlate with the low and high levels of psychology respectively. High-level psychology is assumed to be relatively common-sensical and hence less fragmented than low-level theories. Given this inverse relation between ‘level’ and ‘fragmentation’ the paper concludes by suggesting that high-level ‘Leibnizian’ psychology may serve as a framework for the systematization of low-level Lockian psychology.

In many cases, the attempt at integration required taking a step backward to look at psychology’s intellectual history, for a number of psychological endeavors are hard to explain unless one points to the paths that led up to them ... Much as a river’s water is clearer when it is taken from its spring, so issues which have become more and more complex as detail has piled upon detail become very much clearer when we trace them back to their origin. (Gleitman, 1983, p. xviii)

Keywords

Steam Coherence Stratification Hull Gall 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allport, G.W. (1955). Becoming. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bakan, D. (1986). Metaphysics for psychology: an outline. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
  3. Bergmann, G. (1953). Theoretical psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 4,435–458.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernstein, R.J. (1983). Beyond objectivism and subjectivism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Boer, Th. de (1985). Van wezensschouw naar hermeneuse. Algemeen Nederlands Tijdschrifl voor Wijsbegeerte, 77,36–59.Google Scholar
  6. Brunswik,E. (1952). The conceptual framework of psychology. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Coan, R.W. (1968). Dimensions of psychological theory. American Psychologist,25,715–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coan, R.W. (1973). Toward a psychological interpretation of psychology. Journal for the History of the Behavioral Sciences, IX,313–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Danziger, K. (1983). Origins and basic principles of Wundt’s Volkerpsychologie. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22,303–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dennett, D.C. (1978). Brainstorms, philosophical essays on mind and psychology. Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar
  11. Duijker, H.C.J. (1979). De problematische psychologie. Meppel, Netherlands: Boom.Google Scholar
  12. Eisenga, L.K.A., & Rappard, J.F.H. van (1985). Historische toetsing: een verkenning aan de hand van het behaviorisme. In L.K.A. Eisenga, J.F.H. van Rappard, W. Koops, & E.H. van Olst (Eds.), Over de grenzen van de psychologie (pp. 103–116). Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  13. Fazio, R.H., Zanna, MR, & Cooper, J. (1977). Dissonance and self-perception: an integrative view of each theory’s proper domain of application. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13,464–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fodor, J.A. (1985). Precis of The Modularity of Mind. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences,5 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fuchs, A.H., & Kawash, G.F. (1974). Prescriptive dimensions for five schools of psychology. Journal for the History of the Behavioral Sciences, X,352–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gergen, K.J. (1982). Toward transformation in social knowledge. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gergen, K.J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40,266–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gilgen, A.R. (1981). Life-sustaining systems and consciousness. In E. Klinger (Ed.), Imagery: concepts, results, and applications (pp. 43–55). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  19. Gilgen, A.R. (1985). A strategy for constructing a systematic psychology. Inter national Newsletter of Uninomic Psychology,7, 10–13.Google Scholar
  20. Giorgi, A. (1984). The unfinished business of psychology. In D.P. Rogers (Ed.), Foundations of psychology, some personal views (pp. 18–34). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  21. Giorgi, A. (1985a). Toward the articulation of psychology as a coherent discipline. In S. Koch & D.E. Leaiy (Eds.), A century of psychology as science (pp. 46–55). New York: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Giorgi, A. (1985b). Towards a phenomenologically based unified paradigm for psychology. In D. Kruger (Ed.), The changing reality of modern man-essays in honour of J.H. van den Berg (pp. 20–34). Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Giorgi, A. (1988). Validity and reliability from a phenomenological perspective. In W.J. Baker, L.P. Mos, H.V. Rappard, & H.J. Stam (Eds.), Recent trends in theoretical psychology (pp. 167–176). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gleitman, H. (1983). Basic psychology. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  25. Gosling, J. (1986). Analysis and strategy in the search for unity: epistemic principles for psychology. International Newsletter of Uninomic Psychology,2, 13–19.Google Scholar
  26. Griffith, C.R. (1943). Principles of systematic psychology. ?.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Groot, A.D. de (1961). Methodologie. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.Google Scholar
  28. Groot, A.D. de (1981). Over regels en taken van het forum in de gamma-weten schappen.Meppel, Netherlands: Boom.Google Scholar
  29. Guilford, J.P. (1979). Cognitive psychology with a frame of reference. San Diego: Edits.Google Scholar
  30. Haselager, W.F.G. (1990). Stratifikatie. Unpublished manuscript. Amsterdam: Free University.Google Scholar
  31. Hearnshaw, L.A. (1987). The shaping of modern psychology. London: RKP.Google Scholar
  32. Heidbreder, E. (1933). Seven psychologies. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  33. Hillner, K.P. (1987). Psychology’s compositional problem. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  34. Hintikka, J. (1969). Models for modalities. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel.Google Scholar
  35. Holzkamp, K. (1983). Grundlegung der Psychologic Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
  36. Husserl, E. (1973). Cartesian meditations, an introduction to phenomenology.Translated by Dorion Cairns. The Hague, Netherlands: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  37. Hyland, M.E. (1985). Do person variables exist in different ways? American Psychologist, 40,1003–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kalmar, D.A., & Sternberg, R.J. (1988). Theory knitting: an integrative approach to theory development. Philosophical Psychology,1, 153–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kaplan, B. (1985). The remarriage of science and theology: adumbrations of the post-modern mind. Review of “The return to cosmology: postmodern science and the theology of nature” by Stephen Toulmia New Ideas in Psychol ogy, 3,211–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Keller, F.S. (1937). The definition of psychology — an introduction to psychological systems. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  41. Kelso, J.A.S., & Kay, B.A. (1987). Information and control. A macroscopie analysis of perception-action coupling. In H. Heuer & A.F. Sanders (Eds.), Perspectives on perception and action (pp. 3–32). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  42. Kendler, H.H. (1981). Psychology — a science in conflict. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Kimble, G.A. (1984). Psychology’s two cultures. American Psychologist, 39,833–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Koch, S. (1951). Theoretical psychology 1950: an overview. Psychological Re view,58,295–301.Google Scholar
  45. Koch, S. (1959–1963). Psychology-a study of a science. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  46. Koch, S. (1964). Psychology and emerging conceptions of knowledge as unitary. In T.W. Wann (Ed.), Behaviorism and phenomenology (pp. 1–41). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  47. Kruglanski, A.W., & Klar, Y. (1987). A view from a bridge: synthesizing the consistency and attribution paradigms from a lay epistemic perspective. European Journal of Social Psychology,17, 211 -241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  49. Laudan, L. (1984). Science and values. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  50. Looren-de-Jong,H.,& Sanders, A.F. (1990). Stratification in perception and action.Psychological Research, 52,0–0.Google Scholar
  51. Madsen, K.B. (1959). Theories of motivation. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
  52. Madsen, K.B. (1974) Modern theories of motivation. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
  53. Madsen, K.B. (1987). Theoretical psychology: a definition and systematic classification.In W.J. Baker, M.E. Hyland, H.V van Rappard, & A.W. Staats (Eds.), Current Issues in Theoretical Psychology (pp. 165–174). Amsterdam: North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Maiers, W. (1988). Sechzig Jahre Krise der Psychologic In K. Holzkamp (Ed.), Forum KritischePsychologie, Vol. 21. (pp. 23–82). Berlin: Argument Verlag.Google Scholar
  55. Mandler, G. (1975). Consciousness — respectable, useful and probably necessary. In R.L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition — the Loyola sytnposium (pp. 229–254). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  56. Manicas, P.T. (1986). Whither psychology? In J. Margolis, P.T. Manicas, R. Harre, & RF. Secord (Eds.), Psychology: designing the discipline (pp. 53–90). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  57. Margolis, J. (1986). Psychology and its methodological options. In J. Margolis, P.T. Manicas, R. Harre, & PF. Secord (Eds.), Psychology: designing the discipline (pp. 12–51). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  58. Margolis, J. (1987). Science without unity: reconciling the human and natural sciences. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  59. Mane, M.H, & Cronan-Hillix, W.A. (1987). Systems and theories in psychology (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  60. Marx, M.H., Hillix, W.A. (1973). Systems and theories in psychology (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  61. McGeoch, J.A. (1933). The formal criteria of a systematic psychology. Psychological Review, 40,1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Miller, G.A. (1985). The constitutive problem of psychology. In S. Koch & D.E. Leary (Eds.), A century of psychology as science (pp. 40–45). New York: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Neurath, O. (1938/1970). Unified science as encyclopedic integration. IEUS. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  64. Olst, E.H. van (1990). Biologische psychologic In P.J. van Strien & J.F.H. van Rappard (Eds.), Gronchragen van de psychologie (pp. 95–109). Assen, Netherlands: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
  65. Palmer, S.E. (1987). PDP: a new paradigm for cognitive theory. Contemporary Psychology, 32,925–928.Google Scholar
  66. Pattee, H.H. (Ed.) (1973). Hierarchy Theory. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
  67. Peursen, C.A. van (1967). Fenomenologie en werkelijkheid. Utrecht, Netherlands: Aula.Google Scholar
  68. Pongratz, L.J. (1967). Problemgeschichte der Psychologie. Berne: Francke.Google Scholar
  69. Rappard, H.V. (1980). A monistic interpretation of Wundt’s psychology. Psycho logical Research, 42,123–134.Google Scholar
  70. Robinson, D.H. (1979). Systems of modern psychology. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Rogers, D.P. (1984). Foundations of psychology, some personal views. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  72. Royce, J.R. (1975). Psychology is multi. In W.J. Arnold (Ed.). Nebraska sympo sium on the conceptual foundations of theory and methods in psychology,(pp. 1–63). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  73. Royce, J.R. (1987). A strategy for developing unifying theory in psychology. In A.W. Staats & L.P. Mos (Eds.), Annals of Theoretical Psychology, 5 (pp. 275–285). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Royce, J.R. (Ed.) (1970). Toward unification in psychology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  75. Russelman, G.H.E. (1983). Van James Watt tot Sigmund Freud. Deventer, Netherlands:Van Loghum Slaterus.Google Scholar
  76. Sanders, C, & Rappard, H.V. (1985). Psychology and philosophy of science. In K.B. Madsen & L.P. Mos (Eds.), Annals of Theoretical Psychology (pp. 219–295). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Schachter, D.L. (1982). Stranger behind the engram. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  78. Schopman, J. (1989). The two cultures. Zeitschrift fÜr allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie,XX,96–105.Google Scholar
  79. Solla-Price, D. de (1971). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Spence, J.T. (1987). Centrifugal versus centripetal tendencies in psychology. American Psychologist, 42,1052–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Staats, A.W. (1975). Social Behaviorism. London: Irwin-Dorsey Int.Google Scholar
  82. Staats, A.W. (1983). Psychology’s crisis of disunity. New York Praeger.Google Scholar
  83. Staats, A.W. (1987). Unified positivism: philosophy for the revolution to unity. In A.W. Staats & L.P. Mos (Eds.), Annals of Theoretical Psychology, 5 (pp. 11–54). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Staats, A.W. (1989). Unificationism: philosophy forthe modern disunified sciences of psychology. Philosophical Psychology,2, 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Stagner, R. (1988). A history of psychological theories. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  86. Stern, W. (1935). Allgemeine Psychologie auf personalistischer Grundlage. The Hague, Netherlands: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Sternberg, R.J. (1987). Liking versus loving: a comparative evaluation of theories. Psychological Bulletin, 102,331–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Toulmin, S. (1982). The return to cosmology: postmodern science and the theology of nature. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  89. Vroon, PA. (1985). Psychologie en technologie. The Hague, Netherlands: Psychon.Google Scholar
  90. Watson, R.I. (1967). Psychology: a prescriptive science. American Psychologist,22,435–443.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Watson, R.I. (1971). Prescriptions as operative in the history of psychology. Journal for the History of the Behavioral Sciences, VII,311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wertheimer, M. (1972). Fundamental issues in psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  93. Witte, E.H. (1990). Social influence. A discussion and integration of recent models into a general group situation theory. European Journal for Social Psychol ogy,20,3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Woodward, W.R. (1987). Is theoretical unity possible? Using history to unify psychology. Paper, 95th A.P.A. Convention, New York, August 28.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans V. Rappard
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychonomicsFree UniversityAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations