Psychological Objects, Practice, and History

  • Kurt Danziger
Part of the Annals of Theoretical Psychology book series (AOTP, volume 8)

Summary

The theories of modem psychology always appear as components of complex formations that also have two other components, namely, specific empirical domains and sets of practices employed in the construction of such domains and of the corresponding theories. These formations can only be fully understood through historical analysis, for they are historical products. Their content comprises “psychological objects”, which are the things psychologists take themselves to be investigating and theorizing about. Such psychological objects are not to be confused with natural objects, for they are crucially shaped by the theoretical constructive activity and by the practical intervention of psychological communities. The historical situation of these communities influences their constriction of psychological objects in that it provides the criteria of legitimacy by which specific constructive activities and their products are judged. This does not mean that psychological objects can be reduced to the status of “nothing but” socio-historical constructions, though it does mean that the categories with which the discipline of Psychology works can never be accepted as “natural kinds” and that its research practices lose their supra-mundane status.

Keywords

Coherence Posit Sorting Arena Defend 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ash, M.G. (1980). Academic politics in the history of science: Experimental psychology in Germany, 1987–1941. Central European History, 13, 255–286.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ash, M.G. (1983). The self-presentation of a discipline: History of psychology in the United States between pedagogy and scholarship. In L. Graham, W. Lepenies, & P. Weingaxt (Eds.), Functions and uses of disciplinary histories (pp. 143–189). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ash, M.G. (1985). Gestalt psychology: Origins in Germany and reception in the United States. In C. Buxton (Ed.), Points of view in the history of modern psychology (pp. 295–344). New York; Academic Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bhaskar, R. (1979). The possibility of naturalism. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bloor, D. (1976). Knowledge and social imagery. London: Routledge & Kegan PaulGoogle Scholar
  6. Blumenthal, A. (1980). Wilhelm Wundt and early American psychology: A clash of cultures. In R.W. Rieber and K. Salzinger (Eds.), Psychology: Theoretical-historical perspectives (pp. 25–42). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  7. Braginsky, B.M. and Braginsky, D.D. (1974). Mainstream psychology: A critique. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  8. Burnham, J.C. (1967). Psychoanalysis and American medicine, 1894–1918: Medicine, science and culture. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cronbach, L.J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Danziger, K. (1979). The social origins of modem psychology. In A.R. Buss (Ed.), Psychology in social context (pp. 27–45). New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  11. Danziger, K. (1983a). Origins of the schema of stimulated motion: Towards a pre-history of modem psychology. History of Science, 21, 183–210.Google Scholar
  12. Danziger, K. (1983b). Origins and basic principles of Wundt’s Völkerpsychologie. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 303–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Danziger, K. (1985a). The methodological imperative in psychology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 15,1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Danziger, K. (1985b). The origins of the psychological experiment as a social institution. American Psychologist, 40, 133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Danziger, K. (1987a). Statistical method and the historical development of research practice in American psychology. In L. Kruger, G. Gigerenzer and M.S. Morgan (Eds.), The probabilistic revolution, Vol. 2: Ideas in the sciences (pp. 35–47). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Danziger, K. (1987b). Social context and investigative practice in early twentieth-century psychology. In M.G. Ash & W.R. Woodward (Eds.), Psychology in twentieth-century thought and society (pp. 13–33). New York; Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Danziger, K. (1987c). Hermann Ebbinghaus and the psychological experiment. In W. Traxel (Ed.), Ebbinghaus-Studien 2 (pp. 217–224). Passau: Passavia.Google Scholar
  18. Danziger, K. (1988). On theory and method in psychology. In W.J. Baker, L.P. Mos, H.V. Rappard, & H.J. Stam (Eds.), Recent trends in theoretical psychology (pp. 87–94). New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Danziger, K. (1990a). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Danziger, K. (1990b). Generative metaphor and the history of psychological discourse. In D.E. Leary (Ed.), Metaphors in the history of psychology (pp. 331–356). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Farr, R.M. (1978). On the social significance of artifacts in experimenting. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 299–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fleck, L. (1979). Genesis and development of a scientific fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Gergen, K.J. (1982). Toward transformation in social knowledge. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Geuter, U. (1987). German psychology during the Nazi period. In M.G. Ash & W.R. Woodward (Eds.), Psychology in twentieth century thought and society (pp. 165–187). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Harré, R. (1979). Social being. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  26. Harré, R. (1984). Personal being. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
  27. Harré, R. (1986). Varieties of realism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  28. Harwood, J. (1987). National styles in science: Genetics in Germany and the United States between the World Wars. Isis, 78,390–414.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heelas, P., & Lock, A. (Eds.) (1981). Indigenous psychologies. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  30. Henle, M. (1980). The influence of Gestalt Psychology in America. In R.W. Rieber & K. Salzinger (Eds.), Psychology: Theoretical-historical perspectives (pp. 177–190). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hesse, M. (1980). Revolutions and reconstructions in the philosophy of science. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  32. James, W (1892). A plea for psychology as a `natural science’. Philosophical Review, 1, 146–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jennings, J.L. (1986). The forgotten distinction between psychology and phenomenology. American Psychologist, 41, 1231–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kasschau, R.A., & Kessel, F.S. (Eds.) (1980). Psychology and society. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
  35. Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91–176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Lamiell, J.T. (1987). The psychology of personality: An epistemological inquiry. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  41. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lutz, C., & White, G. (1986). The anthropology of emotions. Annual Review of Anthropology, 15, 405–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Maclntyre, A. (1985). How psychology makes itself true-or-false. In S. Koch & D.E. Leary (Eds.),A century of psychology as science (pp. 897–903). New York: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mandler, G., & Kessen, W. (1959). The language of psychology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  45. Manicas, P.T. (1987). A history and philosophy of the social sciences. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  46. Mayrhauser, R.T. von (1991). The practical language of American intellect. History of the Human Sciences, 4, 371–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Miller, G.A. (1969). Psychology as a means of promoting human welfare. American Psychologist, 234,1063–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Miller, R.W. (1987). Fact and method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Napoli, D.A. (1980). Architects of adjustment: The practice and professionalization of American psychology, 1920–1945. Port Washington, NY: Kennikat Press.Google Scholar
  50. Popper, K. (1972). Objective knowledge. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Putnam, H. (1981). Reason,truth and history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Reed, J. (1987). Robert M. Yerkes and the mental testing movement. In M.M. Sokal, (Ed.), Psychological testing and American society 1890–1930 (pp. 75–94). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Rose, N. (1985). The psychological complex: Psychology, politics and society in England 1869–1939. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  54. Rose, N. (1988). Calculable minds and manageable individuals. History of the Human Sciences, 1, 179–200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R.L. (Eds.), (1969). Artifact in behavioral research. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  56. Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D.B. (1978). Interpersonal expectancy effects: the first 345 studies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 377–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rouse, J. (1987). Knowledge and power: Toward a political philosophy of science. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Samelson, F. (1974). History, origin myths and ideology: Comte’s `discovery’ of social psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 4, 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Samelson, F. (1979). Putting psychology on the map: Ideology and intelligence testing. In A.R. Buss (Ed.), Psychology in Social Context (pp. 103–168). New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
  60. Sarfatti Larson, M. (1977). The rise of professionalism. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  61. Schön, D.A. (1979). Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 254–283). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Shotter, J. (1975). Images of man in psychological research. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  63. Shweder, R.A., & Bourne, E.J. (1984). Does the concept of the person vary cross-culturally? In R.A. Shweder & R.A. LeVine (Eds.), Culture theory: Essays on mind,self and emotion (pp. 158–199). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Smith, R. (1988). Does the history of psychology have a subject? History of the Human Sciences,1, 147–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stocking, G.W., Jr. (1965). On the limits of ‘presentism’ and `historicism’ in the historiography of the behavioral sciences. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 1,211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Valsiner, J. (1986). The individual subject and scientific psychology. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  67. Walkertline, V. (1984). Developmental psychology and the child-centred pedagogy: the insertion of Piaget into early education. In J. Henriques, W. Holloway, C. Urwin, C. Venn, & V. Walkerdine (Eds.), Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity (pp. 153–202). London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  68. Watson, R.I. (1967). Psychology: A prescriptive science. American Psychologist, 22, 435–443.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. White, G., & Kirkpatrick, J. (Eds.), (1985). Person,self and experience. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  70. Whitley, R. (1984). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Young, R.M. (1966). Scholarship and the history of the behavioral sciences. History of Science, 5, 1–51.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kurt Danziger
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyYork UniversityDownsviewCanada

Personalised recommendations