Skip to main content

How Many Cones are Required to “See?”: Lessons from Stargardt’s Macular Dystrophy and from Modeling with Degenerate Photoreceptor Arrays

  • Chapter
Retinal Degeneration

Abstract

In an era of attempts to restore vision by transplanting photoreceptors, it may be worthwhile to consider just how many photoreceptors are required to “see.” “Seeing,” of course, requires definition. From the patient’s perspective, an essential goal is to achieve useful visual acuity. This in turn will require repopulating the fovea with an appropriate number of cones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Hirsch and C. Curcio, The spatial resolution capacity of human foveal retina, Vision Research 29:1095 (1989).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. A.M. Geller, J. Lee, and P.A. Sieving, Effects on spatial sampling of simulated degeneration and retinal eccentricity, Inv. Ophthal. Vis. Sci. (suppl.) 33:1349 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A.M. Geller, P.A. Sieving, D.G. Green, Effect on grating identification of sampling with degenerate arrays, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 9:472 (1992).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. R.C. Eagle, A.C. Lucier, V.B. Bernardino, and M. Yanoff, Retinal pigment epithelial abnormalities in fundus flavimaculatis, Ophthal., 87:1189 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  5. D.G. Birch, M.A. Sandberg, and E.L. Berson, The Stiles-Crawford effect in retinitis pigmentosa, Inv. Ophthal. Vis. Sci., 22:157 (1982).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. A.M. Geller and P.A. Sieving, Assessment of foveal cone photoreceptors in Stargardt’s macular dystrophy using a small dot detection task, In press, Vis. Res.

    Google Scholar 

  7. K.G. Noble and R.E. Carr, Stargardt’s disease and fundus flavimaculatis, Arch. Ophthal., 97:1281 (1979).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. G.A. Fishman, M. Farber, B.S. Patel, and D.J. Derlacki, Visual acuity loss in patients with Stargardt’s macular dystrophy, Ophthal. 94:809 (1987).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. R.G. Weleber and A. Eisner, Cone degeneration (“bull’s-eye dystrophies) and color vision defects, in: ”Retinal Dystrophies and Degeneration,“ D.A. Newsome, ed., Raven Press, New York (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A.C. Bird and J. Marshall, Retinal receptor disorders without known metabolic abnormalities, in: “Pathobiology of Ocular Disease, part B,” Garner and Klintworth, eds., Marcel Dekker, New York (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Krauskopf and R. Srebo, Spectral sensitivity of color mechanisms: derivation from fluctuations of color appearance near threshold, Science 150:1477 (1965).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. C. Cicerone and J. Nerger, The relative numbers of long-wavelength sensitive and middle-wavelength-sensitive cones in the human fovea centralis, Vis. Res. 29:115 (1989).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. C. Cicerone and J. Nerger, The density of cones in the fovea centralis of the human dichromat, Vis. Res. 29:1587 (1989).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Hecht, S. Schlaer, and M. Pirenne, Energy, quanta, and vision, J. Gen. Physiol. 25:819 (1942).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. F.H.C. Marriott, The foveal absolute for short flashes and small fields, J. Physiol. 169:416 (1963).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. R.L.P. Vimal, J. Pokorny, V.C. Smith, and S.K. Shevell, Foveal cone thresholds, Vis. Res. 29:61 (1989).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. M.F. Wesner, J. Pokorny, S.K. Shevell, and V.C. Smith, Foveal cone detection statistics in color-normals and dichromats, Vis. Res. 31:1021 (1991).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. G.J. van Meel and D. van Norren, Foveal densitometry as a diagnostic technique in Stargardt’s disease, Am. J. Ophthal., 102: 353 (1986).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. J. Pokorny, V.C. Smith and J.T. Ernest, Macular color vision defects: specialized psychophysical testing in acquired and hereditary chorioretinal diseases, in: “Electrophysiology and psychophysics, their use in ophthalmic diagnosis, I.O.C. 20,” S. Sokol, ed.,Little, Brown and Co., Boston (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  20. M. Järveläinen and A.H. Milam, unpublished data.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Z.M. Nagy and J.F. Misanin, Visual perception in the retinal degenerate C3H mouse, J. Comp. Physiol. Psych. 72:306 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. K.V. Anderson W.K. O’Steen, Black-white and pattern discrimination in rats without photoreceptors, Experimental Neurology 34:446 (1972).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. M.M. LaVail, M. Sidman, R. Rausin, and R.L. Sidman, Discrimination of light intensity by rats with inherited retinal degeneration, Vis. Res. 14:693 (1974).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. D. Farber and T.A. Shuster, A proposed sequence of events leading to photoreceptor degeneration in the rd mouse retina, in.. “Retinal Degeneration: Experimental and Clinical Studies,” M.M. LaVail, J.G. Hollyfield, and R.E. Anderson, eds., New York, Alan R Liss, Inc. (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  25. H. Klassen and R.D. Lund, Retinal transplants can drive a pupillary reflex in host rat brains, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci USA 84:6958 (1987).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. P. Gouras, J. Du, H. Kjeldbye, S. Yamamoto, D.J. Zack, Reconstruction of degenerate rd mouse retina by transplantation of transgenic photoreceptors, Inv. Ophthal. Vis. Sci. 33:2579 (1992).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. L.T. Maloney, Spatially irregular sampling in combination with rigid movements of the sampling array, Inv. Ophthal. Vis. Sci. (suppl.) 29:58 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  28. A.J. Ahumada and J.I. Yellott, A connectionist model for learning receptor position, Inv. Ophthal. Vis. Sci. (suppl.) 29:58 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Geller, A.M., Sieving, P.A. (1993). How Many Cones are Required to “See?”: Lessons from Stargardt’s Macular Dystrophy and from Modeling with Degenerate Photoreceptor Arrays. In: Hollyfield, J.G., Anderson, R.E., LaVail, M.M. (eds) Retinal Degeneration. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2974-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2974-3_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6294-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-2974-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics