Advertisement

Cardiovascular Flow Velocity Measurements by 2D Doppler Imaging for Assessment of Vascular Function

  • Dan R. Adam
  • Kenneth M. Kempner
  • Mark A. Vivino
  • Eben E. Tucker
  • Michael Jones
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 346)

Abstract

Clinical two-dimensional (2D) Doppler ultrasound flow velocity measurement is important for determination of arterial wall shear stress, blood-tissue exchange, myocardial and valvular function. Such 2D Doppler flow velocity images are usually displayed in color, superimposed on the gray-scale, cross-section structural images of the tissue. There are several limitations to this technique of flow measurement, some due to the instrumentation and some to the way the measurement is made. In this report we concentrate on the latter, identifying the main causes of errors and distortion, and outlining the methodology for minimizing them. The suggested method takes into account the spatial location and orientation of both the ultrasound transducer and the blood vessel. It allows quantification of vascular flow patterns, thus enhancing the usefulness of this important non-invasive diagnostic tool.

Keywords

Blood Flow Velocity Ultrasound Transducer Arterial Lumen Flow Velocity Measurement Flow Velocity Pattern 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bassingthwaighte JB, Wang CW, Chan IS. Blood-tissue exchange via transport and transformation by endothelial cells. Circ Res 1989; 65: 997–1020.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dewey CF, Davies PF, Gimbrone MA. Turbulence, disturbed flow and vascular endothelium. In: Yoshida Y, Yamaguchi T, Caro CG, Glagov S, Nerem RM (eds) Role of Blood Flow in Atherogenesis. Springer-Verlag: Tokyo, pp 201–204, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    O’Brien JR. Shear-induced platelet aggregation. Lancet 1990; 335: 711–713.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moritz WE, Pearlman AS, McCabe DH, Medema DK, Ainsworth ME, Boles MS. An ultrasound technique for imaging the ventricle in three-dimensions and calculating its volume. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1983; 30: 482–492.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Geiser EA, Ariet M, Conetta DA, Lupkiewicz SM, Christie LG, Conti CR. Dynamic three-dimensional echocardiographic reconstruction of the intact human left ventricle: Technique and initial observations in patients. Am Heart J 1982; 103: 1056–1065.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sawada H, Fujii J, Kato K, Onoe M, Kuno K. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the left ventricle from multiple cross sectional echocardiograms: Value for measuring left ventricular volume. Br Heart J 1983; 50: 438–442.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McCann HA, Chandrasekaran K, Hoffman EA, Sinak LJ, Kinter TM, Greenleaf JF. A method for three-dimensional ultrasonic imaging of the heart in vivo. Dynamic Cardiovasc Imaging 1987; 1:97–109.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Levine RA, Handschumacher MD, Sanfilippo Al, Hagege AA, Harrigan P, Marshall JE, Weyman AE. Three-dimensional echocardiographic reconstruction of the mitral valve, with implication for the diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse. Circulation 1989; 80: 589–598.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Martin RW, Bashein G. Measurement of stroke volume with three-dimensional transesophageal ultrasonic scanning: Comparison with thermodilution measurement. Anesthesiology 1989; 70: 470–476.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martin RW Bashein G, Detmer PR, Moritz WE. Ventricular volume measurement from a multiplanar transesophageal ultrasonic imaging system: An in vitro study. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1990; 37: 442–449.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kuroda T, Kinter TM, Seward JB, Yanagi H, Greenleaf JF. Accuracy of three-dimensional volume measurement using biplane transesophageal echocardiographic probe: In vitro experiment. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1991; 4: 475–484.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kitney RI, Moura L, Straughan K. 3-D visualization of arterial structures using ultrasound and voxel modeling. Int J Card Imaging 1989; 4: 135–143.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Potkin BN, Bartorelli AL, Gessert JM, Neville RF, Almagor Y, Roberts WC, Leon MB. Coronary artery imaging with intravascular high-frequency ultrasound. Circulation 1990; 81: 1575–1585.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nissen SE, Grines CL, Gurley JC, Sublett K, Haynie D, Diaz C, Booth DC, DeMaria AN. Application of a new phased-array ultrasound imaging catheter in the assessment of vascular dimensions. Circulation 1990; 81: 660–666.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rosenfield K, Losordo DW, Ramaswamy K, Pastore JO, Langevin RE, Razvi S, Kosowsky BD, Isner JM. Three-dimensional reconstruction of human coronary and peripheral arteries from images recorded during two-dimensional intravascular ultrasound examination. Circulation 1991; 84: 19381956.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Van Dijk P. Direct cardiac NMR imaging of heart wall and blood flow velocity. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1984; 8: 429–436.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bryant DJ, Payne JA, Firmin DN, Longmore DB. Measurement of flow with NMR imaging using a gradient pulse and phase difference technique. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1984; 8: 588–593.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mohiaddin RH, Amanuma MA, Kilner PJ, Pennel DJ, Manzara C, Longmore DB. MR phase-shift velocity mapping of mitral and pulmonary venous flow. J Comput Assist Tomogr1991; 15: 237–243.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Van Rossum A, Sprenger KH, Peels FC, et al. In vivo validation of quantitative flow imaging in arteries and veins using magnetic resonance phase shift techniques. Soc of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Amsterdam, 1989; 205.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kilner PJ, Firmin DN, Rees RSO, et al. Magnetic resonance jet velocity mapping for assessment of valve and great vessel stenosis. Radiology 1991; 178: 229–235.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dan R. Adam
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kenneth M. Kempner
    • 2
  • Mark A. Vivino
    • 2
  • Eben E. Tucker
    • 3
  • Michael Jones
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Biomedical EngineeringHeart System Research CenterHaifaUSA
  2. 2.Division of Computer Resources and TechnologyBethesdaUSA
  3. 3.Cardiology BranchNHLBIBethesdaUSA
  4. 4.SLAMS, NHLBI, NIHBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations