Computer Modelling of the Cochlear Nucleus

  • Ray Meddis
  • Michael J. Hewitt
Part of the NATO ASI series book series (NSSA, volume 239)

Abstract

Computer modelling represents a promising but not yet fully established methodology for studying the complex systems found in the auditory nervous system. In this article we shall be reviewing some of the methods used by modellers and outlining some ideas concerning good practice which, if implemented, should lead to its greater acceptance. Our aim is to dispel some of the skepticism surrounding this activity and make researchers aware of the potential benefits of computer modelling for anatomists and physiologists working in and around the cochlear nucleus.

Keywords

Acoustics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arle, J.E., and Kim, D.O., 1991, Neural modeling of intrinsic and spike-discharge properties of cochlear nucleus neurons, Biol. Cyber., 64:273–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banks, M.I., and Sachs, M.B., 1991, Regularity analysis in a compartmental model of chopper units in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus, J. Neurophysiol., 65:606–629.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Frisina, R.D., 1983, “Enhancement of responses to amplitude modulation in the gerbil cochlear nucleus: single-unit recordings using an improved surgical approach,” Dissertation and special report ISR-S-23, Institute for Sensory Research, Syracuse, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Frisina, R.D., Smith, R.L., and, Chamberlin, S.C., 1990, Encoding of amplitude modulation in the gerbil cochlear nucleus: I. A hierarchy of enhancement, Hearing Res., 44:99–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Frisina, R.D., Smith, R.L., and, Chamberlin, S.C., 1990, Encoding of amplitude modulation in the gerbil cochlear nucleus: II. Possible neural mechanisms, Hearing Res. 44:123–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hewitt, M. J., and Meddis, R., 1991, An evaluation of eight computer models of mammalian inner haircell function, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 90:904–917.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hewitt, M.J., Meddis, R., and Shackleton, T.M., 1992, A computer model of a cochlear nucleus stellate cell: Responses to pure-tone and amplitude-modulated stimuli, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 91:2096–2109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kim, D.O., Sirianni, J.G., and Chang, S.O., 1990, Responses of DCN-PVCN neurons and auditory nerve fibers in unanaesthetized decerebrate cats to AM and pure tones: Analysis with autocorrelation/power-spectrum, Hearing Res., 45:95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. MacGregor, R.J., 1987, “Neural and Brain Modeling”, Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  10. Meddis, R., 1988, Simulation of auditory-neural transduction: Further studies, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 83:1056–1063.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Oertel, D., 1983, Synaptic responses and electrical properties of cells in brain slices of the mouse anteroventral cochlear nucleus, J. Neurosci., 3:2043–2053.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Oertel, D., 1985, Use of brain slices in the study of the auditory system: spatial and temporal summation of synaptic inputs in cells in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus of the mouse, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 78:328–333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pont, M.J. and Damper, R.I., 1991, A computational model of afferent neural activity from the cochlea to the dorsal acoustic stria, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 89:1213–1228.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rall, W., 1989, Cable theory for dendritic neurons, in: “Methods in neuronal modeling: From synapses to networks,” C. Koch and I. Segev eds., MIT press Cambridge, Mass. pp. 9–62.Google Scholar
  15. Young, E.D., Robert, J.-M., and Shofner, W.P., 1988, Regularity and latency of units in the ventral cochlear nucleus: Implications for unit classification and generation of response properties, J. Neurophysiol., 60:1–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Arle, J.E. and Kim, D.O., 1991, A modeling study of single neurons and neural circuits of the ventral and dorsal cochlear nucleus, in: “Analysis and Modeling of Neural Systems”, (proceedings of symposium held in Berkeley, CA, in July 1990), F. Eeckman, ed., Kluwer, Boston.Google Scholar
  17. Arle, J.E. and Kim, D.O., 1991, Neural modeling of intrinsic and spike-discharge properties of cochlear nucleus neurons, Biol. Cyber., 64:273–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Arle, J.E. and Kim, D.O., 1991, Simulations of cochlear nucleus neural circuitry: excitatory-inhibitory response-area types I-IV, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 90:3106–3121.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Banks, M.I. and Sachs, M.B., 1991, Regularity analysis in a compartmental model of chopper units in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus, J. Neurophysiol., 65:606–629.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Berthommier, F., 1989, A model of the relation between tonotopy and synchronisation in the auditory system, CR.Acad.Sc., Serie III, 309:695–701.Google Scholar
  21. Berthommier, F., Schwartz, J.L. and Escudier, P., 1989, “Auditory processing in a post-cochlear neural network: vowel spectrum processing based on spike synchrony”, Eurospeech, Paris.Google Scholar
  22. Berthommier, F., 1990, “Reseaux de neurones et traitement des signaux dans le systeme auditif, technical report”, Faculte de Médecine de Grenoble, France.Google Scholar
  23. Blackwood, N., Meyer, G. and Ainsworth, 1990, A model of the processing of voiced plosives in the auditory nerve and cochlear nucleus, Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics, 12:423–430.Google Scholar
  24. Damper, R.I., Pont, M.J. and Elenius, K, 1991, Representation of Initial Stop Consonants in a Computational Model of the Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus, in: “Advances in Speech, Hearing and Language Processing”, Vol. 3, W.A. Ainsworth, ed., JAI Press Ltd, London, in press.Google Scholar
  25. Diaz, J.M., 1989, “Chopper firing patterns in the mammalian anterior ventral cochlear nucleus: A computer model”, Masters Thesis, Boston University, Boston, Mass.Google Scholar
  26. Davis, K.A., and Voigt, H.F., 1991, Neural modelling of the DCN: PST and cross-correlation analysis using shortduration tone-burst stimuli, Abstracts of the XIVth Midwinter Meeting, Association for Research in Otolaryngology.Google Scholar
  27. Ghoshal, S., Kim, D.O. and Northrop, R.B., 1991, Modeling amplitude-modulated (AM) tone encoding behaviour of cochlear nucleus neurons, Proc. The 17th Annual IEEE Northeast Bioengineering Conference, Hartford, CT. pp. 5-6.Google Scholar
  28. Ghoshal, S., Kim, D.O. and Northrop, R.B., 1992, Amplitude modulated tone encoding behavior of cochlear nucleus neurons: Modeling study, Hear. Res., 58:153–165.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hewitt, M.J., Meddis, R. and Shackleton, T.M., 1992, A computer model of a cochlear-nucleus stellate cell: responses to amplitude-modulated and pure-tone stimuli, J. Acoust. Am., 91:2096–2109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McMullen, T. and Voigt, H., 1984, Neuronal circuitry of dorsal cochlear nucleus: a computer model, Soc. Neuroscience, 10:842, (Abstracts).Google Scholar
  31. Mashari, S.J. and Pont, M.J., 1990, A hybrid neural network model with applications in the study of language acquisition, Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics, 12:315–321.Google Scholar
  32. Meddis, R., Hewitt, M. and Shackleton, T.M., (in press), An anatomical/ physiological approach to auditory selective attention, in: “Auditory physiology and perception” Cazais, L.Demany, and K.Horner, eds., (proceedings of the 9th international symposium on hearing, Carcans, France).Google Scholar
  33. Meddis, R., 1991, A physiological model of auditory selective attention, in: “Advances in Speech, Hearing and Language Processing” Vol 3., W.A.Ainsworth, ed., JAI Press, in press.Google Scholar
  34. Meyer, G.F., Blackwood,N. and Ainsworth, W.A., 1990, A computational model of the auditory nerve and cochlear nucleus, in: “Modelling and Simulation”, B.Schmidt, ed., (fourth European Multiconference, Nuremberg), American Society of Computer Simulation SCS.Google Scholar
  35. Meyer, G.F. and Ainsworth, W.A., 1991, Modelling response patterns in the cochlear nucleus using simple units, in: “Advances in Speech, Hearing and Language Processing”, Vol 3., W.A. Ainsworth, ed., JAI Press Ltd, London, in press.Google Scholar
  36. Meyer, G.F., Morris, A., Ainsworth, W.A. and Schwartz, J.L., 1991, Processing of Plosives by models of cells in the CN, Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics, 13: 485–492.Google Scholar
  37. Neti, C., 1990, “Neural network models of sound localisation based on directional filtering of the pinna”, Ph.D. thesis, Baltimore, Maryland.Google Scholar
  38. Pont, M.J., 1988, A neural model of the mechanisms underlying infant perception of voice-onset time, Neural Networks, Supplement 1:270, (Abstracts).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pont, M.J. and Damper, R.I., 1988, A neural model of infant speech perception, Proceedings SPEECH U88, Edinburgh, p.515-522.Google Scholar
  40. Pont, M.J. and Damper, R.I., 1989, A possible neural basis for the categorical perception of the English voiced / voiceless contrast, Proceedings Eurospeech T89, Paris, pp.239–242.Google Scholar
  41. Pont, M.J. and Damper, R.I., 1989, The representation of synthetic stop consonants in a computational model of the dorsal cochlear nucleus, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Suppl. 1:S45–S46 (Abstract).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pont, M.J., 1990, “The role of the dorsal cochlear nucleus in the perception of voicing contrasts in initial English stop consonants: a computational modelling study”, PhD Thesis, Department of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton. See also (published abstracts): (Pont, M.J. (1990) Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 87, p. 1817; Pont, M.J. (1990) Speech Communication 9:p.95).Google Scholar
  43. Pont, M.J. and Mashari, S.J., 1990, Modelling the acquisition of voicing contrasts in English and Thai, Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics, 12(10): 323–329.Google Scholar
  44. Pont, M.J. and Damper, R.I., 1991, A computational model of afferent neural activity from the cochlea to the acoustic stria, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 89:1213–1228.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pont, M.J. and Damper, R.I., 1991, Exploring the role of the dorsal cochlear nucleus in the perception of voice-onset time, in: “Advances in Speech, Hearing and Language Processing”, Vol 2, W.A. Ainsworth, ed., JAI Press Ltd, London, in press.Google Scholar
  46. Sanders, D.J. and Green, C.G.R., 1991, Properties of modelled and networked cochlear nucleus neurons, in: “Advances in Speech, Hearing and Language Processing”, Vol 3., W.A. Ainsworth, ed., JAI Press Ltd, London, in press.Google Scholar
  47. Voigt, H.F. and Davis, K.A., 1991, Computer simulations of neural correlations in dorsal cochlear nucleus, in: “Advances in Speech, Hearing and Language Processing” Vol. 3., W.A. Ainsworth, ed., JAI Press Ltd, London, in press.Google Scholar
  48. Wu, Z.L., Schwartz, J.L. and Escudier, P., 1991, Physiologically-plausible modules and articulatory-based acoustic events, in: “Advances in Speech, Hearing and Language Processing” Vol. 3., W.A. Ainsworth, ed., JAI Press Ltd, London, in press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ray Meddis
    • 1
  • Michael J. Hewitt
    • 1
  1. 1.Speech and Hearing LaboratoryUniversity of TechnologyLoughboroughUK

Personalised recommendations