Ultra-Wideband Impulse Electromagnetic Scattering Laboratory

  • Michael A. Morgan


The Transient Electromagnetic Scattering Laboratory (TESL) employs a unique dual-channel impulsive illuminating source whose instantaneous frequency spans 1– 12 GHz. Impulse scattering from scale model targets are performed in a shielded anechoic chamber. The TESL has facilitated research into the control of scattering mechanisms and radar target identification using natural resonances1,2. Both of these applications are demanding on accuracy and dynamic range; improvement in the fidelity of measured scattering signatures has been an ongoing theme in the TESL’s evolution since 1980.


Anechoic Chamber Naval Postgraduate School Sampling Head Brass Wire Antenna Coupling 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    M.A. Morgan, Scatterer discrimination based upon natural resonance annihilation, J. Electromag. Waves Appl., 2: 481–502 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M.A. Morgan and P.D. Larison, Natural resonance extraction from ultra-wideband scattering signatures, in: “Ultra-Wideband Radar: Proceedings of the First Los Alamos Symposium,” B. Noel, ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton (1991)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.D. DeLorenzo, A range for measuring the impulse response of scattering objects, 1967 NEREM Record 9: 80–81 (1967).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C.W. Hammond, The development of a bistatic electromagnetic scattering laboratory, M.S. Thesis, Electrical Engineering Department, Naval Postgraduate School (1980).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M.A. Morgan, Time-domain scattering measurements, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Newsletter 6: 5–9 (1984).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M.A. Morgan and B.W. McDaniel, Transient electromagnetic scattering: data acquisition and signal processing, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. IME-37: 263–267 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Sompaee, Computer algorithms for measurement control and signal processing of transient scattering algorithms, M.S. Thesis, Electrical & Computer Engineering Department, Naval Postgraduate School (1988).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    N.J. Walsh, “Bandwidth and signal-to-noise ratio enhancement of the NPS transient electromagnetic scattering laboratory,” M.S. Thesis, Electrical & Computer Engineering Department, Naval Postgraduate School (1989).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M.A. Morgan and N.J. Walsh, Ultra-Wideband transient electromagnetic scattering laboratory, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagat. AP-39: 1230–1234 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A.E. Bresani, Performance enhancement of the NPS Transient Electromagnetic Scattering Laboratory, M.S. Thesis, Electrical & Computer Engineering Department, Naval Postgraduate School (1991).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S.M. Riad, Impulse response evaluation using frequency-domain optimal compensation deconvolution, 23rd Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems University of Toledo (1981).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    E.P. Sayre and R.F. Harrington, Time-domain radiation and scattering by thinwires, Applied Sci. Res., 26: 413–444 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R.S. Elliott, “Antenna Theory and Design,” Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1981).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    F.I Tseng and T.K. Sarkar, Deconvolution of the impulse response of a conducting sphere by the conjugate gradient method, IEEE Trans. Antennas Propagation, AP-35: 105–109 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael A. Morgan
    • 1
  1. 1.Electrical and Computer Engineering DepartmentNaval Postgraduate SchoolMontereyUSA

Personalised recommendations