Competition between CEF Singlet and Kondo Singlet as Origin of Weak Antiferromagnetism and Resistivity Anomaly

  • Y. Kuramoto


In some uranium compounds with 5f2 configuration (U4+) the ground state in the crystalline electric field (CEF) is a nonmagnetic singlet. The singlet CEF state is also realized in the case of praseodymium compounds with 4f2 configuration (Pr3+). In such cases the spin entropy of the system goes to zero as temperature decreases even though interactions with conduction electrons or with f electrons at other sites are absent. This is in striking contrast with the case of cerium compounds with 4f1 configuration (Ce3+) where the Kramers degeneracy associated with the 4f1 configuration should lead to nonvanishing entropy if a Ce ion were isolated. It has been considered from this fact that the case of the singlet CEF ground state is much simpler because one need not consider the Kondo effect and related infrared effects which originate from interaction with conduction electrons. However, URu2Si2 for which the singlet CEF model accounts for the gross feature of the highly anisotropic susceptibility [1], gives clear indication of the Kondo effect in the resistivity[2] at temperatures higher than 100 K. The Kondo-type behavior of the resistivity has also been found in other U systems with a singlet CEF ground state such as UPt2Si2 [3], UPd3 [4], UNi2Al3 [5], and UPd2Al3 [6].


Charge Fluctuation Kondo Effect Vertex Part RKKY Interaction Crystalline Electric Field 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    G.J. Nieuwenhuys, Phys. Rev. B35, 5260 (1987).ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    T.T.M. Palstra, A.A. Menovsky, and J.A. Mydosh, Phys. Rev. B33, 6527 (1986).ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    R.A. Steeman et al.,J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2, 4059 (1990).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    M.-T. Beal-Monod, D. Davidov and R. Orbach, Phys. Rev. B14, 1189 (1976).ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    C. Geibel et al. ,Z. Phys. B83, 305 (1991).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    N. Sato et al. ,J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 61, 32 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    P.W. Anderson, J. Phys. C3, 2436 (1970).ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    K. Yamada, K. Yosida, and K. Hanzawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 71, 84 (1984).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    T. Saso, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. No.108, 89 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Y. Kuramoto, Z. Phys. B53, 57 (1983).ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    A.A. Abrikosov, Physics 2, 5 (1965).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    H. Amitsuka et al. ,to be published in Physica B.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    T. Sakakibara et al. ,to be published in Physica B.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    B.A. Jones, CM. Varma and J.W. Wilkins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 125 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    O. Sakai, Y. Shimizu and T. Kasuya, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 58, 3666 (1989)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [15a]
    O. Sakai, Y. Shimizu and T. Kasuya, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. No.108, 73 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [16]
    K.G. Wilson, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 773 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [17]
    R.M. Fye and J.E. Hirsch, Phys. Rev. B40, 4780 (1989).ADSGoogle Scholar
  19. [18]
    M. Jarrel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 168 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [19]
    M.J. Rozenberg, X.Y. Zhang, and G. Kotliar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1236 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [20]
    A. Georges and W. Krauth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1240 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [21]
    Y. Kuramoto and K. Miyake, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. No.108, 199 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [22]
    C. Broholm et al. ,Phys. Rev. B43, 12809 (1991).ADSGoogle Scholar
  24. [23]
    U. Steigenberger et al. ,J. Magn. & Magn. Mater. 108, 163 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [24]
    W.J.L. Buyers et al. ,Physica 102B+C, 291 (1980).ADSGoogle Scholar
  26. [25]
    K.A. McEwen, U. Steigenberger, and J.L. Martinez, to be published in Physica B.Google Scholar
  27. [26]
    K. Andres et al. ,Solid State Commun. 28, 405 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [27]
    H. Amitsuka et al. ,J. Magn. & Magn. Mater. 104–107, 60 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [28]
    A. de Visser et al. ,Phys. Rev. B34, 8168 (1986).ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. Kuramoto
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsTohoku UniversitySendaiJapan

Personalised recommendations