Progress in Electrodermal Research pp 7-29

Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 249) | Cite as

Electrodermal Mechanisms: A Critique of the Two-Effector Hypothesis and a Proposed Replacement

  • Robert Edelberg

Abstract

Although response amplitude and response rate have served as the primary electrodermal measures in behavioral research, several lines of evidence have given hope that in addition to these quantitative indicators, electrodermal activity might provide qualitative indices as well. When one examines the behavioral correlates of the electrodermal reflex, it becomes evident that EDA may be associated with very different adaptations, e.g. tactual exploration, grasping, thermoregulation, or ambulation (Darrow, 1927; Edelberg, 1973a; Fowles, 1986; Boucsein, 1988), as well as the abstracted representation of such actions, for example information intake. The reviews elsewhere in this volume by Roy et al and by Sequeira-Martinho and Roy, covering the neurophysiological systems underlying these adaptations, reveal the existence in the CNS of at least two relatively independent descending pathways that control electrodermal activity (EDA), one of reticular origin under cortical and sensory influences (Bloch, 1965), the other a direct corticospinal system, suggesting that different cutaneous adjustments may follow activation of these respective areas. If true, a two-effector system may be an effective means of accomplishing such adjustments.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams, T., 1966, Characteristics of eccrine sweat gland activity in the footpad of the cat, J. Appl. Physiol. 21, 1004–1012.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, T. and Vaughan, J.A., 1965, Human eccrine sweat gland activity and palmar electrical skin resistance, J. Appl. Physiol. 20, 980–983.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ax, A.F. and Bamford, J.L., 1970, The GSR recovery limb in chronic schizophrenia, Psychophysiol. 7,145–147.Google Scholar
  4. Bloch, V., 1965, Le contrôle central de l’activité électrodermale: étude neurophysiologique et psychophysiologique d’un indice sympathique de l’activation réticulaire, J. Physiol. (Paris) 57, Suppl. 13, 1–132.Google Scholar
  5. Boucsein, W., 1988, “Electrodermale Aktivität: Grundlagen, Methoden und Anwendungen,” Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  6. Boucsein, W. and Hoffmann, G., 1979, A direct comparison of the skin conductance and skin resistance methods, Psychophysiol. 16, 66–70.Google Scholar
  7. Braham, J., 1979, Skin wrinkling on immersion of hands: a test of sympathetic function, Arch. Neurol. 36, 113–114.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brebner, D.F. and Kerslake, D.McK., 1964, The time course of the decline in sweating produced by wetting the skin, J. Physiol. (London) 175, 295–302.Google Scholar
  9. Bull, R.H.C. and Nethercott, R.E., 1972, Physiological recovery and personality, Br. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 11, 297.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bundy, R.S., 1974, The effect of previous responses on the skin conductance recovery limb, Psychophysiol. 11, 221–222, (abstr).Google Scholar
  11. Bundy, R.S. and Fitzgerald, H.E., 1975, Stimulus specificity of electrodermal recovery time: an examination and reinterpretation of the evidence, Psychophysiol. 12, 406–411.Google Scholar
  12. Burton, A.C., 1962, Physical principles of circulatory phenomena: the physical equilibria of heart and blood vessel, Chap. 6 in: “Handbook of Physiology,” Section 2, “Circulation,” Amer. Physiol. Soc., Wash. D.C.Google Scholar
  13. Darrow, C.W., 1927, Sensory, secretory and electrical changes in the skin following bodily excitation. J. Exp. Psychol. 10, 197–226.Google Scholar
  14. Darrow, C.W., 1932, The relation of the galvanic skin reflex recovery curve to reactivity, resistance level, and perspiration, J. Gen. Psychol. 7, 261–273.Google Scholar
  15. Darrow, C.W., 1937, Neural mechanisms controlling the palmar galvanic skin reflex and sweating: a consideration of available literature, Arch. Neurol. Psychiat. 37, 641–663.Google Scholar
  16. Darrow, C.W. and Freeman, G.L., 1934, Palmar skin-resistance changes contrasted with non-palmar changes, and rate of insensible weight loss, J. Exp. Psychol. 17, 739–748.Google Scholar
  17. Darrow, C.W., Wilcott, R.C., Siegel, A., Wilson, J., Watanabe, K., and Vieth, R., 1957, The mechanism of diphasic skin potential response, Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 9, 169, (abstr).Google Scholar
  18. Dimberg, U., 1990, Facial electromyographic reactions and automonic activity to auditory stimuli, Biol. Psychol. 31,137–147.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Edelberg, R., 1961, The relationship between the galvanic skin response, vasoconstriction, and tactile sensitivity, J. Exp. Psychol. 62, 187–195.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Edelberg, R., 1963, Electrophysiologic characteristics and interpretation of skin potentials, Sch. Aerospace Med. Tech. Doc. Rpt. 63–95.Google Scholar
  21. Edelberg, R., 1964, Independence of galvanic skin response amplitude and sweat production, J. Invest. Derm. 42, 443 448.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Edelberg, R., 1966, Reponse of cutaneous water barrier to ideational stimulation: a GSR component, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 61, 28–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Edelberg, R., 1968, Biopotentials from the skin surface: the hydration effect, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 148, 252–262.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Edelberg, R., 1970, The information content of the recovery limb of the electrodermal response, Psychophysiol. 6, 527–539.Google Scholar
  25. Edelberg, R., 1971, Electrical properties of skin, Chap. 15 in: “Biophysical Properties of the Skin,” H.R. Eiden, ed., Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Edelberg, R., 1972a, Electrodermal recovery rate, goal-orientation, and aversion, Psychophysiol. 9, 512–520.Google Scholar
  27. Edelberg, R., 1972b, The electrodermal system, Chap. 9 in: “Handbook of Psychophysiology,” N.S. Greenfield and R.A. Sternbach, eds., Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Edelberg, R., 1973a, Mechanisms of electrodermal adaptations for locomotion, manipulation, or defense, in: Progress in Physiological Psychology,” Vol 5, E. Stellar and J.M. Sprague, eds., Academic Press, New York, pp. 155–209.Google Scholar
  29. Edelberg, R., 1973b, The role of an epidermal component in control of electrodermal recovery rate. Paper presented at the 13th Annual Meeting of the Society for Psychophysiological Research, Galveston. Psychophysiol. 11, 221 (abstr).Google Scholar
  30. Edelberg, R., 1977, The status of the electrodermal recovery measure: a caveat. Paper presented at the 17th Annual Meeting of the Society for Psychophysiological Research, Philadelphia. Psychophysiol. 15, 283–284(abstr).Google Scholar
  31. Edelberg, R., 1979, More on the mechanism of electrodermal recovery. Paper presented at the 19th Annual Meeting of the Society for Psychophysiological Research, Cincinanati. Psychophysiol. 17, 305–306(abstr).Google Scholar
  32. Edelberg, R., 1983, The effects of initial levels of sweat duct filling and skin hydration on electrodermal response amplitude, Psychophysiol. 20, 550–557.Google Scholar
  33. Edelberg, R., Greiner, T., and Burch, N.R., 1960, Some membrane properties of the effector in the galvanic skin response, J. Appl. Physiol. 15, 691–696.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Edelberg, R. and Muller, M., 1981, Prior activity as a determinant of electrodermal recovery rate, Psychophysiol. 18, 17–25.Google Scholar
  35. Edelberg, R. and Wright, D.J., 1964, Two galvanic skin response effector organs and their stimulus specificity, Psychophysiol. 1, 39–47.Google Scholar
  36. Flesch, P., Goldstone, S.B., and Urbach, F., 1951, Palmar pore patterns: their significance in the absorption of dyes, Arch. Derm. Syphilol. 63, 228–231.Google Scholar
  37. Forbes, T.W. and Bolles, M.M., 1936, Correlation of the response potentials of the skin with “exciting” and non“exciting” stimuli, J. Psychol. 2, 273–285.Google Scholar
  38. Fowles, D.C., 1974, Mechanisms of electrodermal activity, Chap. 9 in: “Bioelectric Recording Techniques,” eR.F. Thompson and M. Patterson, eds., New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  39. Fowles, D.C., 1986, The eccrine system and electrodermal activity, Chap 4 in: “Psychophysiology: Systems, Processes, and Applications,” M.G.H. Coles, E. Donchin, and S.W. Porges, eds., Guilford Press, New York.Google Scholar
  40. Fowles, D.C. and Johnson, G., 1973, The influence of variations in electrolyte concentration on skin potential level and response amplitude, Biol. Psychol., 1, 151–160.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Fowles, D.C. and Rosenberry, R., 1973, Effects of epidermal hydration on skin potential responses and levels, Psychophysiol. 10, 601–611.Google Scholar
  42. Fowles, D.C. and Schneider, R.E., 1974, Effects of epidermal hydration on skin conductance responses and levels, Biol. Psychol. 2, 67–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Fowles, D.C. and Schneider, R.E., 1978, Electrolyte medium effects on measurements of palmar skin potential, Psychophysiol. 15, 474–482.Google Scholar
  44. Fowles, D.C. and Venables, P.H., 1970, The effects of epidermal hydration and sodium reabsorption on palmar skin potential, Psychol. Bull. 73, 363–378.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Freeman, G.L. and Katzoff, E.T., 1942, Methodological evaluation of the galvanic skin reflex with special reference to the formula for R. Q. (recovery quotient), J. Exp. Psychol. 31, 239–248.Google Scholar
  46. Furedy, J.J., 1972, Electrodermal recovery time as a supra sensitive autonomic index of anticipated intensity of threatened shock, Psychophysiol. 9, 281–282.Google Scholar
  47. Gildemeister, M., 1915, Der sogenannte psychogalvanische Reflex und seine physikalischchemische Deutung. Pflüg. Arch. ges. Physiol., 162, 489–506.Google Scholar
  48. Gruzelier, J.H. and Venables, P.H., 1972, Skin conductance orienting activity in a heterogeneous sample of schizophrenics: possible evidence of limbic dysfunction, J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 155, 277–287.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Guyton, A.C., Granger, HJ., and Taylor, A.E., 1971, Interstitial fluid pressure, Physiol. Rev. 51, 527–563.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Hare, R.D., 1978, Electrodermal and cardiovascular correlates of psychopathy, in: “Psychopathic Behavior: Approaches to Research,” R.D. Hare and D. Schalling, eds., Wiley, London.Google Scholar
  51. Hygge, S. and Hugdahl, K., 1985, Skin conductance recordings and the NaCl concentration of the electrolyte, Psychophysiol. 22, 365–367.Google Scholar
  52. Janes, C.L., 1982, Electrodermal recovery and stimulus significance, Psychophysiol. 19, 129–135.Google Scholar
  53. Janes, C.L., Strock, B.D., Weeks, D.G., and Worland, J., 1985, The effect of stimulus significance on skin conductance recovery, Psychophysiol. 22, 138–146.Google Scholar
  54. Jeje, A. and Koon, D., 1989, An analysis on the rates and regulation of insensible water loss through the eccrine sweat glands, J. Theor. Biol. 141, 303–324.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Jenkinson, D.M., Montgomery, I., and Elder, H.Y., 1978, Studies on the nature of the peripheral sudomotor control mechanism, J. Anat. 125, 625–639.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Katkin, E.S., Weintraub, G.S. and Yasser, A.M., 1967, Stimulus specificity of epidermal and sweat gland contributions to GSR, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 64, 186–190.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Kuno, Y., 1956, “Human Perspiration,” Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, p. 16.Google Scholar
  58. Lang, H., Tuovinen, T. and Valleala, P., 1964, Amygdaloid afterdischarge and galvanic skin response, Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 16, 366–374.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Levander, S.E., Schalling, D.S., Lidberg, L., Bartfai, A., and Lidberg, Y., 1980, Skin conductance recovery time and personality in a group of criminals, Psychophysiol. 17, 105–111.Google Scholar
  60. Lockhart, R.A., 1972, Interrelations between amplitude, latency, rise time, and the Edelberg recovery measure of the galvanic skin response, Psychophysiol. 9, 437–442.Google Scholar
  61. Lykken, D.T., 1971, Square-wave analysis of skin impedance, Psychophysiol. 7, 262–275.Google Scholar
  62. Lykken, D.T., Miller, R.D., and Strahan, R.F., 1966, GSR and polarization capacity of the skin, Psychonom. Sci. 4, 355–356.Google Scholar
  63. Maricq, H.R., 1972, The effect of stripping on sweat ducts observed by intravital microscopy, J. Invest. Derm. 59, 375–379.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Maricq, H.R. and Edelberg, R., Electrodermal recovery rate in a schizophrenic population, 1975, Psychophysiol. 12, 630–633.Google Scholar
  65. Martin, I. and Venables, P.H., 1966, Mechanisms of palmar skin resistance and skin potential, Psychol. Bull. 65, 347–357.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. McCleary, R.A., 1950, The nature of the galvanic skin response, Psychol. Bull. 42, 97–117.Google Scholar
  67. Mednick, S.A. and Schulsinger, F., 1965, A longitudinal study of children with a high risk for schizophrenia: a preliminary report, in: “Methods and Goals in Human Behavior Genentics,” S. Vandenberg, ed., Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  68. Mednick, S.A. and Schulsinger, F., 1968, Some premorbid characteristics related to breakdown in children with schizophrenic mothers, in: “Transmission of Schizophrenia,” D. Rosenthal and S.S. Kety, eds., Pergamon Press, London.Google Scholar
  69. Montagu, J.D., 1958, The psychogalvanic reflex: a comparison of A.C. skin resistance and skin potential changes, J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat. 21, 119–128.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Montagu, J.D. and Coles, E.M., 1966, Mechanism and measurement of the galvanic skin response, Psychol. Bull. 65, 261–279.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Mordkoff, A.M., 1968, Palmar-dorsal skin conductance differences during classical conditioning, Psychophysiol. 5, 61–66.Google Scholar
  72. Mordkoff, A.M., Edelberg, R., and Ustick, M., 1967, The differential conditionability of two components of the skin conductance response, Psychophysiol. 4, 40–47.Google Scholar
  73. Nakayama, T. and Takagi, K., 1958, Two components involved in galvanic skin response, Jap. J. Physiol. 8, 21–30.Google Scholar
  74. Öhman, A. Nordby, H., and D’Elia, G., 1989, Orienting in schizophrenia: habituation to auditory stimuli of constant and varying intensity in patients of high and low skin conductance responsivity, Psychophysiol. 26, 48–61.Google Scholar
  75. Papa, C.M. and Kligman, A.M., 1967, Mechanisms of eccrine anidrosis. II The antiperspirant effect of aluminum salts, J. Invest. Derm. 49, 139–145.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Patterson, T., 1976, Skin conductance recovery and pupillometrics in chronic schizophrenia, Psychophysiol. 13, 189–195.Google Scholar
  77. Peiss, C.N. and Randall, W.C., 1957, The effect of vapor impermeable gloves on evaporation and sweat suppression in the hand, J. Invest. Derm. 28, 443–448.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Potts, R.O., 1986, Stratum corneum hydration: experimental techniques and interpretation of results, J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 37, 9–33.Google Scholar
  79. Putterman, G.J., Wolejsza, N.F., Wolfram, M.A., and Laden, K., 1977, The effect of detergents on swelling of stratum corneum, J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 28, 521–532.Google Scholar
  80. Quatrale, R.P., Thomas, E.L., and Birnbaum, J.E., 1985, The site of antiperspirant action by aluminum salts in the eccrine sweat glands of the axilla, J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 36, 435–440.Google Scholar
  81. Rein, H., 1929, Der Electrophysiologie der Haut, in: “Handbuch der Haut und Geschlechtskrankheiten, 1/2,” J. Jadassohn, ed., Springer, Berlin. Cited by S. Rothman, 1954, “Physiology and Biochemistry of the Skin,” Univ. Chic. Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  82. Rhein, L.D., Robbins, C.R., Fernee, K. and Cantore, R., 1986, Surfactant structure effects on swelling of isolated human stratum corneum, J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 37, 125–139.Google Scholar
  83. Richter, C.P., 1929, Physiological factors involved in the electrical resistance of the skin, Amer. J. Physiol. 88, 596–615.Google Scholar
  84. Richter, C.P., 1930, Galvanic skin reflex from animals with complete transection of the spinal cord, Amer. J. Physiol. 93, 468–472.Google Scholar
  85. Robbins, C.R. and Fernee, K.M., 1983, Some observations on the swelling of human epidermal membrane, J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 34, 21–34.Google Scholar
  86. Rushmer, R.F., Buettner, K.J.K., Short, J.M. and Odland, G.F., 1966, The skin, Science 154, 343–348.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. Sarkany, I., Shuster, S. and Stammers, M.C., 1965, Occlusion of the sweat pore by hydration, Brit. J. Derm. 77, 101–104.Google Scholar
  88. Sato, K., 1977, The physiology, pharmacology, and biochemistry of the eccrine sweat gland, Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharm. 79, 51–131.Google Scholar
  89. Schulz, I., Ullrich, K.F., Frömter, e., Holzgreve, H., Frick, A., and Hegel, U., 1965, Mikropunktion und electrische Potentialmessung an Schweisdrü sen des Menschen, Pflüg. Arch. ges. Physiol. 284, 360–372.Google Scholar
  90. Schulz I.J., 1969, Micropuncture studies of the sweat formation in cystic fibrosis patients, J. Clin. Invest. 48, 1470–1477.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Schwartz, I.L., 1960, Extrarenal regulation with special reference to the sweat glands, in: “Mineral Metabolism,” Vol. 1, C.L. Colmar and F. Bronner, eds., Academic Press, New York. Cited in Fowles, D.C. and Venables, P.H., 1970, The effects of epidermal hydration and sodium reabsorption on palmar skin potential, Psychol. Bull. 73, 363-378.Google Scholar
  92. Schwartz, I.L. and Thaysen, J.H., 1956, Excretion of sodium and potassium in human sweat, J. Clin. Invest. 35, 114–120.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. Shaver, B.A., Brusilow, S.W. and Cooke, R.E., 1965, Electropyhysiology of the sweat gland: intraductal potential changes during secretion, Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp. 116, 100–109.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Siddle D.A.T., Mednick, S.A., Nicol, A.R. and Foggitt, R.H., 1976, Skin conductance recovery in antisocial adolescents, Brit. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 15, 425–428.Google Scholar
  95. Sorgatz, H., 1978, Components of skin impedance level, Biol. Psychol. 6, 121-125.Google Scholar
  96. Stevens, L.M. and Landis, S.C., 1988, Developmental interactions between sweat glands and the sympathetic neurons which innervate them: effects of delayed innervation on neurotransmitter plasticity and gland maturation, Devel Biol. 130, 703–720.Google Scholar
  97. Stombaugh, D.P. and Adams, T., 1971, Skin electrical phenomena, sweat gland activity, and epidermal hydration of the cat footpad, Amer. J. Physiol. 221, 1014–1018.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  98. Suchi, T., 1955, Experiments on electrical resistance of the human epidermis, Jap. J. Physiol. 5, 75–80.Google Scholar
  99. Takagi, K. and Nakayama, T., 1959, Peripheral effector mechanism of galvanic skin reflex, Jap. J. Physiol. 9, 1–7.Google Scholar
  100. Tregear, R.T., 1962, The structures which limit the penetrability of the skin, J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 13, 145–151.Google Scholar
  101. Trehub, A, Tucker, I., and Cazavelan, J., 1962, Epidermal beta waves and changes in basal potentials of the skin, Amer. J. Psychol. 75, 140–143.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Venables, P.H. and Christie, M.J., 1973, Mechanisms, instrumentation, recording techniques, and quantification of responses, Chap. 1, in: “Electrodermal Activity in Psychological Research,” W.F. Prokasy and D.C. Raskin., eds., Academic Press, New YorGoogle Scholar
  103. Venables, P.H. and Fletcher, R.P., 1981, The status of skin conductance recovery time: an examination of the Bundy effect, Psychophysiol. 18, 10–16.Google Scholar
  104. Waid, W.W., 1974, Degree of goal-orientation, level of cognitive activity and electrodermal recovery rate, Percept. Mot. Sk. 38, 103–109.Google Scholar
  105. Wang, G.H., 1964, “The Neural Control of Sweating,” Univ. Wisc. Press, Madison.Google Scholar
  106. Wilcott, R.C. 1958, Effects of local blood removal on skin resistance and potential, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 51, 295–300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Wilcott, R.C., 1959, On the role of the epidermis in the production of skin resistance and potential, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 52, 642–649.Google Scholar
  108. Wilcott, R.C., 1964, The partial independence of skin potential and skin resistance from sweating, Psychophysiol. 1, 55–66.Google Scholar
  109. Wilcott, R.C., 1966, Adaptive value of arousal sweating and the epidermal mechanism related to skin potential and skin resistance, Psychophysiol. 2, 249–262.Google Scholar
  110. Wilcott, R.C., 1967, Arousal sweating and electrodermal phenomena, Psychol. Bull. 67, 58–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  111. Yamazaki, K., Tajimi, T., Okuda, K., and Niimi, Y., 1975, Skin potential activity in rats, cats and primates (including man): a phylogenetic point of view, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 89, 364–370.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. Yates, J.R., 1971, Mechanism of water uptake by skin, Chap. 14 in: “Biophysical properties of the skin,” H.R. Eiden, ed., Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  113. Yokota, T, Takahashi, T., Kondo, M. and Fujimori, B., 1959, Studies on the diphasic wave form of the galvanic skin reflex, Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 11, 687–696.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. Zahn, T.P., Carpenter, W.T., and McGlashen, T.H., 1976, Autonomic variables related to short term outcome in acute schizohrenic patients, Psychophysiol. 13, 166 (abstr).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Edelberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryUMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical SchoolPiscatawayUSA

Personalised recommendations