The work on this paper arose from some studies into how practitioners solved the problem of knowledge elicitation. These studies were illuminating since the most common situation seemed to be that no strategy was employed and that the activity in essence was based on chance. in other words when practitioners were asked what strategy they were using the most common answer was that they did not know but they could do it anyway.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.D. Harel, “Algorithmes — the Spirit of Computing”, Addison-Wesley, London, (1987).Google Scholar
- 2.D. Knuth, “Fundamental Algorithms”, 2ed, Addison-Wesley, Wokingham, (1979).Google Scholar
- 3.G. Gibbs, “Improving Student Learning”, the Oxford Centre for Staff Development, Oxford, (1990).Google Scholar
- 5.A. Hart, “Knowledge Acquisition for Expert Systems”, Kogan Page, London, (1989).Google Scholar
- 6.A.J. Kelly, “A Theory of Personality”, the Norton Library, New York, (1963). the Open University, “Complexity, Management and Change”, T301 Block IV, Open University Press (1983).Google Scholar
- 7.P.B. Checkland and J. Scholes, “Soft Systems Methodology in Action”, Wiley, Chichester, (1991)Google Scholar
- 9.E. De Bono, “The Mechanism of Mind”, Simon & Schuster, New York, (1969).Google Scholar
- 10.B. Schneiderman, “Designing the User Interface”, Addison-Wesley, New York, (1987).Google Scholar
- 11.R.J. Brachman and H.J. Levesque, ed., “Readings in Knowledge Representation”, Morgan Kaufmann, New York, (1985).Google Scholar
- 12.M.J. Stific and D.G. Bobrow, Object-Oriented Programming — Themes and Variations, The AI Magazine, 2(4), 40–62, (1984).Google Scholar
- 13.P. Johnson, “Human Computer Interaction”, McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead, (1992).Google Scholar