Abstract
The last two decades have witnessed fundamental changes in the practice of clinical oncology. Perhaps the most important is the acknowledgement that partial, or in many cases even complete, clinical remissions do not usually result in substantial survival benefit. The degree of tumor reduction obtainable with present standard therapy regimens is not sufficient to prolong survival in most patients. The importance of dose intensity in achieving a higher response rate’ and, arguably, survival2 has encouraged some oncologists, usually in a clinical trials milieu, to accept absolute but reversible granulocytopenia as a justifiable side effect of chemotherapy. This change in attitude has been fostered by the successes of bone marrow transplantation as well as by the development of improved supportive agents and approaches. Concurrently, several hematopoietic cytokines capable of ameliorating hematologic toxicity and the side-effects of dose-intensive therapy have become clinically available. These changes are the basis for a series of trials conducted over the last six years at the University of New Mexico Cancer Center attempting to achieve even greater dose rate intensity and total dose intensity than that used in most transplantation programs. The results of those trials are the substance of this report.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
W.M. Hryniuk, Average relative dose intensity and the impact on design of clinical trials. Semin in Onc 14(1):56,(1987)
E. Frei III, K. Antman, B. Teicher, et al, Bone marrow auto transplantation for solid tumors - prospects. J Clin Oncol 7(4):515(1989).
J. Neidhart, Dose intensive treatment of breast cancer supported by granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Breast Cancer Treatment 20: S153(1991).
J. Armitage, Bone marrow transplantation in the treatment of patients with lymphoma. Blood 73(7):1749(1989).
J. Neidhart, R.Kubica, C.Stidley, et al, Multiple cycles of dose-intensive cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin (DICEP) produce durable responses in refractory non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Cancer Invest, In-press.
F. Schabel, D. Griswold, T. Corbett, et al, Increasing the therapeutic response rates to anticancer drugs by applying the basic principles of pharmacology. Cancer 54:1160 (1984).
J. Henderson, D. Hayes, R. Gelman, Dose-response in the treatment of breast cancer: a critical review. J Clin Oncol 6:1501(1988).
J. Neidhart, W. Kohler, C. Stidley, et al, A Phase I study of repeated cycles of high dose cyclophosphamide, etoposide and cisplatin administered without bone marrow transplantation. J Clin Oncol 8:1728(1990).
W. Peters, E. Shpall, R. Jones, et al, Critical factors in the design of high-dose combination chemotherapy regimens, in: Advances in Cancer Chemotherapy, High dose therapy and autolougous marrow transplantation. G.P. Herzig, ed., Park Row, Dallas(1987).
J. Neidhart, A. Mangalik, W. Kohler, et al, Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (rhg-CSF) stimulates recovery of granulocytes in patients receiving dose-intensive chemotherapy without bone marrow transplantation. J Clin Oncol 7(11):1685(1989).
J. Neidhart, A. Mangalik, C. Stidley, et al, Dosing regimen of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) to support dose-intensive chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol (In Press).
D. Clark, A. Castillo, J. Neidhart, Myeloid progenitors after high dose chemotherapy and granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor treatment. Proc. Am. Assc,:. Cancer Res., April 1990.
S. Huan, J. Yau, F. Dunphy, et al, Impact of autolougous bone marrow infusion on hematopoietic recovery after high-dose cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin. J Clin Oncol 9:1609(1991).
F. Dunphy, G. Spitzer, A. Buzdar, et al, Treatment of estrogen receptor-negative or hormonally refractory breast cancer with double high-dose chemotherapy intensification and bone marrow support. J Clin Oncol 8:1207(1990).
W. Peters, E. Shpall, R. Jones, et al, High-dose combination alkylating agents with bone marrow support as initial treatment for metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 6:1368(1988).
D. Johnson, M. DeLeo, K. Hande, et al, High-dose induction chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 5:703(1987).
A. Harstrick, H. Schmoll, C. Bokemeyer, et al, Cisplatin, etoposide, ifosfamide stepwise escalation with concomitant granulocyte/macrophage-colony-stimulating factor for patients with far-advanced testicular carcinoma. J Can Res Clin Oncol 117:S198(1991).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1993 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Neidhart, J.A. (1993). Hematopoietic Cytokines to Support Repeated Doses of Dose-Intensive Chemotherapy with Cyclophosphamide, Etoposide, and Cisplatin (DICEP). In: Moody, T.W. (eds) Growth Factors, Peptides and Receptors. GWUMC Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Annual Spring Symposia. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2846-3_40
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2846-3_40
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-306-44484-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-2846-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive