Laser Microperforation of Medicago Sativa Root Hair Cells

  • Guenther Leitz
  • Armen Kurkdjian
  • Pierre Manigault
  • Abdellah Harim
  • Karl Otto Greulich

Abstract

Microperforation of the plant cell wall of root hairs from Medicago sativa can be performed without mechanical contact by using a UV laser microbeam under plasmolytical conditions. Through a gentle and progressive plasmolysis the cells remain viable and the plasma membrane stays intact. The cellular polarity of the root hairs is basically maintained, and it is possible to gain direct access to distinct membrane areas. The plasma membrane is free of visible traces of cell wall fragments, as shown by fluorescence microscopy with Tinopal. The opening in the cell wall (from 1 to 5 μm) leads to a probably turgor-driven movement of protoplasm. The protoplasm can be completely extruded forming a spherical, turgid protoplast which contains the nucleus and shows cytoplasmic streaming. In many cases, only a partial extrusion of the cell content leads to subprotoplasts of various sizes which are still connected to the root hair. Protoplast viability was tested by staining with fluorescein diacetate. The movement of protoplasm depends on the calcium concentration of the extracellular medium. Addition of 0.5 to 1 mM calcium chloride stabilizes the process and clearly increases the yield of successfully opened root hairs. Laser microsurgery avoids the side effects of enzymatic digestion of the plant cell wall. Furthermore, the cell-to-cell interactions through plasmodesmata can be maintained. This preparative laser microtechnique should provide primary material for the study of membrane properties, for example, by using the patch clamp technique (Neher, 1992; Sakmann, 1992).

Keywords

Permeability Cellulose Quartz Magnesium Maize 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashkin, A., Dziedzic, J.M., Bjorkholm, J.E., and Chu, S. (1986) Observation of a single-beam gradient force optical trap for dielectric particles. Optics Lett. 11: 288–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bangerth, F. (1979) Calcium-related physiological disorders of plants. Annu. Rev. Phyto-pathol. 17: 97–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berns, M.W., Aist, J., Edwards, J., Strahs, K., Girton, J., McNeill, P., Rattner, J. B., Kitzes, M., Hammer-Wilson, M., Liaw, L.-H., Siemens, A., Koonce, M., Peterson, S., Brenner, S., Burt, J., Walter, R., Bryant, P.J., van Dyk, D., Coulombe, J., Cahill, T., and Berns, G.S. (1981) Laser microsurgery in cell and developmental biology. Science 213: 504–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berns, M.W., Wright, W.H., Tromberg, B.J., Profeta, G.A., Andrews, J.J., and Walter, RJ. (1989) Use of a laser-induced optical force trap to study chromosome movement on the mitotic spindle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86: 4539–4543.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Block, S.M. (1990) Optical traps: A new tool for biophysics, in: “Noninvasive Techniques in Cell Biology”, J.K. Foskett, S. Grinstein, eds., Wiley-Liss, New York, 375–402.Google Scholar
  6. Brasitus, T.A., and Dudeja, P.K. (1988) Small and large intestinal plasmamembranes: structure and functions, in: “Lipid domains and the Relationship to Membrane Function. Advances in Membrane Fluidity, Vol. 2”, R.C. Aloia, C.C. Curtain, L.M. Gordon, eds., Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York, 227–254.Google Scholar
  7. Browse, J., Somerville, C.R., and Slack, C.R. (1988) Changes in lipid composition during protoplast isolation. Plant Sci. 56: 15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carafoli, E., and Crompton, M. (1978) The regulation of intracellular calcium. Curr. Top. Membr. Transp. 10: 151–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen, Q., and Boss, W.F. (1990) Short-term treatment with cell wall degrading enzymes increases the activity of the inositol phospholipid kinases and the vanadate-sensitive ATPase of carrot cells. Plant Physiol. 94: 1820–1829.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clarkson, D.T. (1991) Root structure and sites of ion uptake, in: “Plant roots — the hidden half”, Y. Waisel, A. Eshel, and U. Kafkafi, eds., M. Dekker, Inc., New York, 417–453.Google Scholar
  11. Curtain, C.C, Gordon, L.M., and Aloia, R.C. (1988) Lipid domains in biological membranes: conceptual development and significance, in: “Lipid domains and the Relationship to Membrane Function. Advances in Membrane Fluidity, Vol. 2”, R.C. Aloia, C.C. Curtain, L.M. Gordon, eds., Alan R. Liss, Inc., New York, 1–15.Google Scholar
  12. Dugas, CM., Quanning, L., Khan, I.A., and Nothnagel, E.A. (1989) Lateral diffusion in the plasma membrane of maize protoplasts with implications for cell culture. Planta 179: 387–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elzenga, J.T.M., Keller, C.P., and Van Volkenburgh, E. (1991) Patch clamping protoplasts from vascular plants — Methods for the quick isolation of protoplasts having a high success rate of gigaseal formation. Plant Physiol. 97: 1573–1575.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fairly, K.A., and Walker, N.A. (1989) Patch clamping corn protoplasts. Gigaseal frequency is not improved by congo red inhibition of cell wall regeneration. Protoplasma 153: 111–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Falconer, M., and Seagull, R.W. (1985) Immunofluorescent and calcofluor white staining of developing tracheary elements in Zinnia elegans L. suspension cultures. Protoplasma 125: 190–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Furtula, V., Khan, I.A., and Nothnagel, E.A. (1990) Selective osmotic effect on diffusion of plasma membrane lipids in maize protoplasts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 87: 6532–6536.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garrill, A., Lew, R.R., and Heath, I.B. (1992) Stretch-activated Ca2+ and Ca2+-activated K+ channels in the hyphal tip plasma membrane of the oomycete Saprolegniaferax. J. Cell Sci. 101: 721–730.Google Scholar
  18. Gring, H., Polevoy, V., Stahlberg, R., and Stumpe, G. (1979) Depolarization of transmembrane potential of corn and wheat coleoptiles under reduced water potential and after IAA application. Plant and Cell Physiol. 20: 649–656.Google Scholar
  19. Greulich, K.O. (1992) Moving particles by light: No longer science fiction. Proceedings RMS 27: 3–8.Google Scholar
  20. Greulich, K.O., and Weber, G. (1992) The light microscope on its way from an analytical to a preparative tool. J. Microscopy 167: 127–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gunning, B.E.S., and Overall, R.L. (1983) Plasmodesmata and cell-to-cell transport in plants. Bioscience 33: 260–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hahn, G., and Lörz, H. (1988) Release of phytotoxic factors from plant cell walls during protoplast isolation. J. Plant Physiol. 132: 345–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ishii, S. (1987) Generation of active oxygen species during enzymic isolation of protoplasts from oat leaves, in vitro. Cell Dev. Biol. 23: 653–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Larkin, PJ. (1976) Purification and viability determinations of plant protoplasts. Planta 128: 213–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Laver, D.R. (1991) A surgical method for accessing the plasma membrane of Chara australis.Protoplasma 161: 79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maheshwari, S.C, Gill, R., Maheshwari, N., and Gharyal, P.K. (1986) Isolation and regeneration of protoplasts from higher plants, in: “Differentiation of Protoplasts and of transformed Plant Cells”, J. Reinert and H. Binding, eds., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 3–36.Google Scholar
  27. Monajembashi, S., Cremer, C, Cremer, T., Wolfrum, J., and Greulich, K.O. (1986) Microdissection of human chromosomes by a laser microbeam. Exp. Cell Res. 167: 262–265.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Morris, P., Linstead, P., and Thain, J.F. (1981) Comparative studies of leaf tissue and isolated protoplasts. J. Exp. Bot. 32: 801–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Neher, E. (1992) Ion channels for communication between and within cells. Science 256: 498–502.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Potrykus, I., and Shillito, R.D. (1986) Protoplasts: Isolation, culture, plant regeneration. Meth. Enzymol. 118: 549–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Robards, A.W., and Lucas, W.J. (1990) Plasmodesmata. Amu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol Biol 41: 369–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sakmann, B. (1992) Elementary steps in synaptic transmission revealed by currents through single ion channels. Science 256: 498–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sakurai, N. (1991) Cell wall functions in growth and development — a physical and chemical point of view. Bot. Mag. Tokyo 104: 235–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Saunders, J.A., and Bates, G.W. (1987) Chemically induced fusion of plant protoplasts, in: “Cell Fusion”, A.E. Sowers, ed., Plenum Press, New York, 497–520.Google Scholar
  35. Schnepf, E., Deichgräber, G., Bopp, M. (1986) Growth, cell wall formation and differentiation in the protonema of the moss: Funaria hygrometrica: effect of plasmolysis on the developmental program and its expression. Protoplasma 133: 50–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schnepf, E. (1986) Cellular polarity. Amu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 37: 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang, H., Cutler, A.J., Saleem, M., and Fowke, L. C. (1989) Microtubules in maize protoplasts derived from cell suspension cultures: effect of calcium and magnesium ions. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 49: 80–86.Google Scholar
  38. Weber, G., Monajembashi, S., Greulich, K.O., and Wolfram, J. (1989) Uptake of DNA in chloroplasts of Brassica napus (L.) facilitated by a UV-laser microbeam. Eur.J.Cell Biol. 49: 73–79.Google Scholar
  39. Weber, G., Monajembashi, S., Wolfram, J., and Greulich, K.O. (1990) Genetic changes induced in higher plant cells by a laser microbeam. Physiol. Plant. 79: 190–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Weber, G., and Greulich, K.O. (1992) Manipulation of cells, organelles, and genomes by laser microbeam and optical trap. Int. Rev. Cytol. 133: 1–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Weber, G., Leitz, G., Seeger, S., and Greulich, K.O. (1992) Laser microbeams as optical tools for living cells. J. Exp. Bot. 43: 250: 72.Google Scholar
  42. Wiegand (Steubing), R., Weber, G., Zimmermann, K., Monajembashi, S., Wolfram, J., and Greulich, K.O. (1987) Laser induced fusion of mammalian cells and plant protoplasts. J. Cell Sci. 88: 145–149.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhu, X.-Y., and Negrutiu, I. (1991) Isolation and culture of protoplasts, in: “A Laboratory Guide for Cellular and Molecular Plant Biology”, I. Negratiu, G. Gharti-Chhetri, eds., Birkhäuser, Basel, 18–27.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guenther Leitz
    • 1
    • 2
  • Armen Kurkdjian
    • 3
  • Pierre Manigault
    • 3
  • Abdellah Harim
    • 1
  • Karl Otto Greulich
    • 1
  1. 1.Physikalisch Chemisches InstitutUniversität HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
  2. 2.Zellenlehre, Fakultät für BiologieUniversität HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany
  3. 3.C.N.R.S., Institut des Sciences VégétalesGif-sur-Yvette CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations