Plant Functional Types

  • T. M. Smith
  • H. H. Shugart
  • F. I. Woodward
  • P. J. Burton


Biomes or ecosystem types have long been recognized as occupying domains in an environmental space defined by temperature and moisture gradients. Within particular biomes, the factors governing structure and dynamics may vary considerably. For example, species composition and age structure in plant communities are largely controlled by asymmetric competition for an above-ground resource (light) and symmetric competition for below-ground resources (moisture and nutrients). In mesic forests, the principal constraint seems to be the availability of light. As a forest environment tends from mesic to xeric conditions, the effective constraint shifts from above-ground to below-ground (Tilman 1988; Smith and Huston 1989). In still drier environs, the forest yields to grassland, where the principal constraint is below-ground. This suggests that there are general trends or patterns in the relative influence of environmental constraints in structuring ecosystems.


Functional Type American Naturalist Moisture Gradient Shade Tolerance Plant Functional Type 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Allen, T.F.H. and Starr, T.B. (1982). Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, T.F.H. and Hoekstra, T.W. (1984). Nested and non-nested hierarchies: a significant distinction for ecological systems. In Proceedings of the Society for General Systems Research. I. Systems Methodologies and Isomorphics, ed. A.W. Smith, pp. 175–80. Lewiston, New York: Intersystems Publications, Coutts Library Service.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, M.C. (1964). Light relations of terrestrial plant communities and their measurement. Biological Reviews, 39, 425–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bazzaz, F.A. (1979). The physiological ecology of plant succession. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 10, 351–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bolin, B., Döös, B.R., Warrick, R.A. and Jaeger, J. (1986). The Greenhouse Effect, Climatic Change, and Ecosystems. SCOPE 29. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. Bonan, G.B. (1990). Carbon and nitrogen cycling in North American boreal forests. II. Biogeographic patterns. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 20, 1077–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bormann, F.H. and Likens, G.E. (1981). Pattern and Process in a Forested Ecosystem. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  8. Box, E.O. (1981). Macroclimate and Plant Forms: An Introduction to Predictive Modeling in Phytogeography. The Hague: Junk.Google Scholar
  9. Brokaw, N.V.L. (1985a). Gap-phase regeneration in a tropical forest. Ecology, 66, 682–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brokaw, N.V.L. (1985b). Treefalls, regrowth, and community structure in tropical forests. In The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics, ed. S.T.A. Pickett and P.S. White, pp. 101–8. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bryant, J.P., Chapin, F.S. and Klein, D.R. (1983). Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory. Oikos, 40, 357–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Budowski, G. (1965). Distribution of tropical American trees in the light of the successional process. Turrialba, 15, 40–2.Google Scholar
  13. Budowski, G. (1970). The distinction between old secondary and climax species in tropical Central American lowland forests. Tropical Ecology, 11, 44–8.Google Scholar
  14. Challinor, D. (1968). Alteration of soil surface characteristics by four tree species. Ecology, 49, 286–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chapin, F.S. (1980). The mineral nutrition of wild plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 11, 233–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chapin, F.S., Bloom, A.J., Field, C.B. and Waring, R.H. (1987). Plant responses to multiple environmental factors. Bioscience, 37, 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chazdon, R.L. (1986). The costs of leaf support in understory palms: Economy versus safety. American Naturalist, 127, 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Coffin, D.P. and Lauenroth, W.K. (1990). A gap dynamics simulation model of succession in a semi-arid grassland. Ecological Modelling, 49, 229–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cowan, I.R. (1968). The interception and absorption of radiation in plants. Journal of Applied Ecology, 5, 367–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cowan, I.R. (1971). Light in plant stands with horizontal foliage. Journal of Applied Ecology, 8, 579–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cowan, I.R. (1986). Economics of carbon fixation in higher plants. In On the Economy of Plant Form and Function, ed. T.J. Givnish, pp. 133–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Delcourt, H.R., Delcourt, P.A. and Webb, T. III. (1983). Dynamic plant ecology: The spectrum of vegetation change in space and time. Quaternary Science Review, 1, 153–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Finegan, B. (1984). Forest succession. Nature, 312, 109–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Givnish, T.J. (1978). On the adaptive significance of compound leaves, with particular reference to tropical trees. In Tropical Trees as Living Systems, ed. P.B. Tomlinson and M.H. Zimmermann, pp. 351–80. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Givnish, T.J. (1979). On the adaptive significance of leaf form. In Topics in Plant Population Biology, ed. O.T. Solbrig, S. Jain, G.B. Johnson and P.H. Raven, pp. 375–407. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Givnish, T.J. (1982). On the adaptive significance of leaf height in forest herbs. American Naturalist, 120, 353–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Greenslade, P. J.M. (1983). Adversity selection and the habitat templet. American Naturalist, 122, 352–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grime, J.P. (1977). Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. American Naturalist, 111, 1169–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grime, J.P. (1979). Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. Halle’, F. (1974). Architecture of trees in the rain forest of Morobe District, New Guinea. Biotropica, 6, 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Halle’, F. and Oldemann, R.A.A. (1975). Essay on the Architecture and Dynamics of Growth of Tropical Trees. Penerbit University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.Google Scholar
  32. Hartshorn, G.S. (1978). Tree falls and tropical forest dynamics. In Tropical Trees as Living Systems, ed. P.B. Tomlinson and M.H. Zimmermann, pp. 617–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Helvey, J.D. and Patric, J.H. (1965). Canopy and litter interception of rainfall by hardwoods of the eastern United States. Water Resources Research, 1, 193–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Holdridge, L.R. (1967). Life Zone Ecology. Tropical Science Center, San Jose, Costa Rica.Google Scholar
  35. Huston, M.A. and Smith, T.M. (1987). Plant succession: Life history and competition. American Naturalist, 130, 168–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leemans, R. and Prentice, I.C. (1989). A General Forest Succession Model. Meddelanden, 2, 1–45. Växtbiologiska Institutionen, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
  37. MacArthur, R.H. and Wilson, E.O. (1967). The Theory of Island Biogeography. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Mooney, H.A. and Gulmon, S.L. (1979). Environmental and evolutionary constraints on the photosynthetic characteristics of higher plants. In Topics in Plant Population Biology, ed. O.T. Solbrig, S. Jain, G.B. Johnson and P.H. Raven, pp. 316–37. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Mooney, H.A. and Gulmon, S.L. (1982). Constraints on leaf structure and function in reference to herbivory. Bioscience, 332, 198–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Noble, I.R., Moore, A.D. and Strasser, M.J. (1988). Predicting Vegetation Dynamics Based on Structural and Functional Attributes. Proceedings, International Symposium on Vegetation Structure, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  41. Noble, I.R. and Slatyer, R.O. (1980). The use of vital attributes to predict successional changes in plant communities subject to recurrent disturbances. Vegetatio, 43, 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. O’Neill, R.V., DeAngelis, D.L., Waide, J.B. and Allen, T.F.H. (1986). A Hierarchical Concept of the Ecosystem. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Orians, G.H. and Solbrig, O.T. 1977. A cost-income model of leaves and roots with special reference to arid and semiarid areas. American Naturalist, 111, 677–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Parkhurst, D.G. and Loucks, O.L. (1972). Optimal leaf size in relation to environment. Journal of Ecology, 60, 505–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Parsons, R.F. (1968). The significance of growth rate comparisons for plant ecology. American Naturalist, 102, 295–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pickett, S.T.A. and White, P.S. ed. (1985). The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  47. Raunkiaer, C. (1934). The Life-forms of Plants and Statistical Plant Geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Rosswall T., R.G. Woodmansee and P.G. Risser, Eds. (1987). Scales and Global Change. Scope 35. NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  49. Shear, G.M. and Stewart, W.D. (1934). Moisture and pH studies of the soil under forest trees. Ecology, 15, 350–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shugart, H.H. (1984). A Theory of Forest Dynamics. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shugart, H.H. (1987). Dynamic ecosystem consequences of tree birth and death patterns. Bioscience, 37, 596–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shugart, H.H., Leemans, R. and Bonan, G.B. (1991). A Systems Analysis of the Global Boreal Forest. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Smith, T.M. and Huston, M. (1989). A theory of the spatial and temporal dynamics of plant communities. Vegetatio, 83, 49–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Smith, T.M. and Urban, D.L. (1988). Scale and resolution of forest structural pattern. Vegetatio, 74, 143–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Solomon, A.M. (1986). Transient response of forests to CO2-induced climate change: simulation experiments in eastern North America. Oecologia, 68, 567–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Solomon, A.M. and Webb, T. III. (1985). Computer-aided reconstruction of late-Quaternary landscape dynamics. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 16, 63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. South wood, T.R.E. (1977). Habitat, the templet for ecological strategies. Journal of Animal Ecology, 46, 337–65.Google Scholar
  58. Swift, L.W., Swank, W.T., Mankin, J.B., Luxmore, R.J. and Goldstein, R.A. (1979). Simulation of evapotranspiration and drainage from mature and clear-cut deciduous forests and young pine plantation. Water Resources Research, 11, 667–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tilman, D. (1988). Resource Competition and Community Structure. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Urban, D.L., O’Neill, R.V. and Shugart, H.H. (1987). Landscape ecology. Bioscience, 37, 119–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Van Stennis, C.G.G.J. (1958). Rejuvination as a factor for judging the status of vegetation types: the biological nomad theory. In Study of tropical vegetation: Proceedings of the Kandy Symposium, pp. 212–15. UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
  62. Walker, B.H., Ludwig, D., Holling, C.S. and Peterman, R.M. (1981). Stability of semi-arid savanna grazing systems. Journal of Ecology, 69, 473–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Watt, A.S. (1925). On the ecology of British beech woods with special reference to their regeneration. Journal of Ecology, 13, 27–73. numerical analysis of complex rain-forest communities. V. A comparison of the properties of floristic and physiognomic-structural data. Journal of Ecology, 58, 203–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Whittaker, R.H. (1975). Communities and Ecosystems. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  65. Whittaker, R.H. and Goodman, D. (1979). Classifying species according to their demographic strategy. I. Population fluctuations and environmental heterogeneity. American Naturalist, 113, 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zinke, P.J. (1962). The pattern of influence of individual trees on soil properties. Ecology, 43, 130–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. M. Smith
  • H. H. Shugart
  • F. I. Woodward
  • P. J. Burton

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations