Dynamic Pricing under Static Regulation:The Case of UBP

  • Thomas A. AbbottIII
  • Michael A. Crew
Part of the Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy book series (TREP, volume 18)


Traditional utilities face a dynamic and increasingly competitive environment. Economists have long argued for the benefits of competition in terms of improved efficiency. To obtain these benefits, however, it is important not only that companies change their approach to selling products but also that regulation changes. In this paper, we argue that current forms of regulation—rate-of-return (ROR) and price-cap (PCR)—are based on static foundations that are ill-suited to the situation of consumers and industries facing significant dynamic changes. Our approach is illustrative and intended to encourage further thought on the nature of regulatory institutions under conditions of dynamic change.


Local Service Dynamic Price Public Utility Incentive Regulation Usage Charge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abbott, Thomas A., and Michael A. Crew. 1993. “Incentives for Efficiency Under ‘Incentive’ Regulation.” Presented at the 7th Annual Western Conference, July 7–9, 1993.Google Scholar
  2. Averch, H., and L.L. Johnson. 1962. “Behavior of the Firm Under Regulatory Constraint.”American Economic Review 52 (December): 1052–1069.Google Scholar
  3. Baron, David P., and David Besanko. 1987. “Commitment and Fairness in a Dynamic Regulatory Relationship.” Review of Economic Studies 65: 413–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, Stephen J., and David S. Sibley. 1986. The Theory of Public Utility Price. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Crew, Michael A., and Robert E. Dansby. 1982. “Cost-Benefit Analysis of Local Measured Service.” In Regulatory Reform and Public Utilities, edited by M.A. Crew. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  6. Federal Communications Commission. 1991. Statistics of Communications Common Carriers, 1990/91 Edition. U.S. Government Printing Office, ISBN 0–16–036031–5.Google Scholar
  7. Littlechild, Stephen C. 1982. Regulation of British Telecommunications Profitability. London: Department of Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
  8. Lyon, Thomas. 1992. “Incentive Regulation with `Deadbands’ and Sharing Rules.” Unpublished manuscript (April).Google Scholar
  9. Neu, Werner. 1993. “Allocative Inefficiency Properties of Price-Cap Regulation.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 5(2): 159–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Park, Rollo Edward, and Bridger M. Mitchell. 1987. Optimal Peak Load Pricing for Local Telephone Calls. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation R-3404–1-RC (March).Google Scholar
  11. Vogelsang, Ingo. 1989. “Price-Cap Regulation of Telecommunications Services: A Long-Run Approach.” In Deregulation and Diversification of Utilities, edited by M.A. Crew. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Vogelsang, Ingo, and Jorg Finsinger. 1979. “A Regulatory Adjustment Process for Optimal Pricing by Multiproduct Monopoly Firms.” Bell Journal of Economics 10: 157–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Weisman, D.L. 1993. “Superior Regulatory Regimes in Theory and Practice.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 5:4: 355–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas A. AbbottIII
  • Michael A. Crew

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations