Abstract
Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) is non-ionizing radiation with shorter wavelengths than visible light. The primary source of human exposure to UVR is the sun, although there are a variety of non-solar sources which also emit UVR. UVR encompasses wavelengths between 100 nm and 400 nm, and has been divided into three broad ranges on the basis of biologic activity: UVC comprises the shortest wavelengths, usually 100-280 nm; UVB includes 280 to 315 or 320 nm; and UVA consists of the longer wavelengths. UVC is the most dangerous to life, but is relatively unimportant because no solar UVC reaches the earth. UVB is called the erythemal range because of its ability to cause the redness of skin which is called “erythema” and which can end up as sunburn. UVA has generally been considered to be relatively safe because obvious injurious effects are minimal. There is, however, heterogeneity of effect within each range depending on the intensity of the specific wavelengths present. All UVR below 290–295 nm is absorbed by the earth’s atmosphere, thereby limiting the range of wavelengths comprising solar exposure. This is not true for non-solar sources where wavelengths in any of the ranges may be present; however, UVC of wavelengths shorter than 200 nm is heavily attenuated by air so that virtually no exposure in this range occurs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beral V, Evans S, Shaw H, Milton G. Malignant melanoma and exposure to fluorescent lighting at work. Lancet 1982;2:290–3.
Elwood JM. Could melanoma be caused by fluorescent light? A review of relevant epidemiology. Recent Results Cancer Res 1986;102:127–36.
Rigel DS, Friedman RJ, Levenstein MJ, Greenwald DI. Relationship of fluorescent lights to malignant melanoma: Another view. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1983;9:836–8.
Swerdlow AJ, English JSC, MacKie RM, et al. Fluorescent lights, ultraviolet lamps, and risk of cutaneous melanoma. Br Med J 1988;297:647–50.
English DR, Rouse IL, Xu Z, et al. Cutaneous malignant melanoma and fluorescent lighting. JNCI 1985;74:1191–7.
Dubin N, Moseson M, Pasternack BS. Epidemiology of malignant melanoma: Pigmentary traits, ultraviolet radiation, and the identification of high risk populations. Recent Results Cancer Res 1986;102:56–75.
Sorahan T, Grimley RP. The aetiological significance of sunlight and fluorescent lighting in malignant melanoma: A case-control study. Br J Cancer 1985;52:765–9.
Elwood JM, Williamson C, Stapleton PJ. Malignant melanoma in relation to moles, pigmentation, and exposure to fluorescent and other lighting sources. Br J Cancer 1986;53:65–74.
Osterlind A, Tucker MA, Stone BJ, Jensen OM. The Danish case-control study of cutaneous malignant melanoma. II. Importance of UV-light exposure. Int J Cancer 1988;42:319–24.
Walter SD, Marrett LD, Shannon HS, et al. The association of cutaneous malignant melanoma and fluorescent light exposure. Am J Epidemiol 1992;135:749–62.
Maxwell KJ, Elwood JM. Could melanoma be caused by fluorescent light? A review of relevant physics. Recent Results Cancer Res 1986;102:137–43.
Gallagher RP, Elwood JM, Hill GB. Risk factors for cutaneous malignant melanoma: The Western Canada melanoma study. Recent Results Cancer Res 1986;102:38–55.
Walter SD, Marrett LD, From L, et al. The association of cutaneous malignant melanoma with the use of sunbeds and sunlamps. Am J Epidemiol 1990;131:232–43.
Autier P, Joarlette M, Lejeune F, et al. Cutaneous malignant melanoma and exposure to sunlamps and sunbeds: A descriptive study in Belgium. Melanoma Research 1991;1: 69–74.
Stern RS. PUVA carcinogenesis after ten years: Prospect and retrospect (editorial). Photodermatology 1986;3:257–60.
Gupta AK, Stern RS, Swanson NA, Anderson TF. PUVA Follow-up Study: Cutaneous melanoma in patients treated with psoralens plus ultraviolet A: A case report and the experience of the PUVA Follow-up Study. J Am Acad Dermatol 1988;19:67–76.
Swerdlow AJ, Hunter JAA, O’Doherty CJ, et al. Sunlamps and the risk of melanoma (Letter). Br Med J 1988;297:1193–4.
Hu H. Effects of ultraviolet radiation. Environ Med 1990;74:509–14.
Health and Welfare Canada. Radiation emitting devices regulations. Radiation Emitting Devices Act, Chapter 34. Revised Statutes of Canada, 1986.
Diffy BL, Farr PM. Tanning with UVB or UVA: An appraisal of risks. J Photochem Photobiol B 1991;8:219–23.
Wilkinson FJ. Recommended UV exposure limits for tanning equipment, and spectral irradiances of solarium lamps, sunlamps and daylight. Australian Physical Engineering Science in Med 1983;6:26–34.
National Institutes of Health. Sunlight, ultraviolet radiation and the skin. Consensus Development Conference Statement 1989;7:1–29.
Anonymous. Protecting man from UV exposure (editorial). Lancet 1991;337:1258–9.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marrett, L.D. (1994). Non-solar sources of ultraviolet radiation and cutaneous malignant melanoma: a review of the evidence. In: Gallagher, R.P., Elwood, J.M. (eds) Epidemiological Aspects of Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma. Developments in Oncology, vol 73. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2626-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2626-1_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6126-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-2626-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive