String-Parton Model Description of Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collisions

  • A. S. Umar
  • D. J. Dean
  • M. R. Strayer
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSB, volume 335)


Various models have been developed to address the ordinary hadronic physics that occurs in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. These include string-based fragmentation models such as the LUND model1, and its extensions in FRITIOF2, which assume that excited hadrons behave as a chain of color dipoles that move like one-dimensional relativistic strings. Interactions are introduced via multiple small momentum exchanges between the color dipoles of two overlapping strings. Other nondynamical models are the dual-parton model3, in which the strings are formed by soft gluon exchange between the valence partons of the colliding hadrons. The quark-gluon string model4 (QGSM), also based on the dual parton model, has been developed to study soft parton collisions, and includes rescattering. The strings in the above models are in fact one-dimensional constructions in momentum space, and string evolution is carried out in this space. They are sometimes referred to as the longitudinal phase space models. Any coordinate space quantities that these models may study come from transformations from momentum space one-dimensional string coordinates to configuration space. Relativistic quantum molecular dynamics (RQMD) calculations have also been performed to study relativistic collision phenomena5. This approach combines resonance formation and decay of light hadronic states, and one-dimensional string fragmentation (LUND model) for very heavy resonances. RQMD follows the full space-time evolution of the light hadronic states, and uses one-dimensional momentum space evolution for the heavy states via the LUND string description.


Color Dipole Central Rapidity Region String Endpoint Maximum Energy Density NA35 Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    B. Andersson and G. Gustafson, Z. Phys. C 3, 223 (1980)ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. B. Andersson, G. Gustafson, G. Ingelman, and T. Sjostrand, Phys. Rep. 97, 33 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 2.
    B. Andersson, G. Gustafson, and B. Nilsson-Almqvist, Nucl. Phys. B281, 289 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 3.
    K. Werner, Z. Phys. C 42, 85 (1989).Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    N. S. Amelin, E. F. Staubo, L. P. Csernai, V. D. Toneev, K. K. Gudima, and D. Strottman, Phys. Lett. B261, 352 (1991).ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 5.
    H. Sorge, A. v. Keitz, R. Mattiello, H. Stöcker, and W. Greiner, Z. Phys. C. 47 629 (1990).ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 6.
    D. J. Dean, A. S. Umar, J. -S. Wu, and M. R. Strayer, Phys. Rev. C 45, 400 (1992).ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. 7.
    A. S. Umar, D. J. Dean, and M. R. Strayer, in Proceedings of Quark Matter ’91, edited by T. C. Awes, F. E. Obenshain, F. Plasil, M. R. Strayer, and C. Y. Wong, Nucl. Phys. A544, 475c (1992).Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    D. J. Dean, M. Gyulassy, B. Müller, E. A. Remler, M. R. Strayer, A. S. Umar, and J.-S. Wu, Phys. Rev. C 46, 2066 (1992).ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 9.
    D. J. Dean, A. S. Umar, and M. R. Strayer, Intl. Jour. of Mod. Phys. E.Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    R. Albrecht, et al., WA80 Collaboration, Phys. Rev. C 44, 2736 (1991).ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 11.
    H. Ströbele et al., NA35 Collaboration, Nucl. Phys. A525, 59c (1991).ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 12.
    R. Cutler and D. Sivers, Phys. Rev. D 17, 196 (1978).ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 13.
    N. Isgur, Nucl. Phys. A497, 91c (1989)ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. K. Maltman and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D 29, 952 (1984).ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. 14.
    R. Kokoski and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D 35, 907 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. G. A. Miller, Phys. Rev. D 37, 2431 (1988)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. P. Geiger and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D 41, 1595 (1990).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 15.
    P. Mättig, Phys. Rep. 177, 141 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 16.
    K. Sailer, B. Müller, and W. Greiner, J. Mod. Phys. A4, 437 (1989)ADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 16.
    K. Sailer, B. Müller, and W. Greiner, Proc. of The Nuclear Equation of State, ed. W. Greiner and H. Stöcker, (Plenum, New York, 1990) p.531.Google Scholar
  22. 17.
    E. A. Remler, Proc. of Gross Properties of Nuclei and Nuclear Excitations, Hirschegg, 1987, p.24.Google Scholar
  23. 18.
    K. Werner, Phys. Lett. B219, 111 (1989).ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. S. Umar
    • 1
    • 2
  • D. J. Dean
    • 3
  • M. R. Strayer
    • 1
  1. 1.Physics Division, Oak Ridge National LaboratoryCenter for Computationally Intensive PhysicsOak RidgeUSA
  2. 2.Department of Physics & AstronomyVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA
  3. 3.W. K. Kellogg Radiation LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyPasadenaUSA

Personalised recommendations