Advertisement

How does Retinal Preprocessing Affect the Receptive Field of a Stabilized Hebbian Neuron

  • Harel Shouval
  • Yong Liu
Conference paper

Abstract

Many biological experiments have demonstrated that receptive fields in the visual cortex of cats are dramaticly influenced by the visual environment. In a normal reared animal, the population of sharply tuned neurons increases monotonically, whereas for dark reared animals it initially increases, and then falls back to the initial level (Imbert and Buisseret, 1975). Furthermore the shapes of the receptive fields, in the mature animal, depend on the nature of the environment to which the animals are exposed (Blackmore and Van-Sluythers, 1975).

Keywords

Correlation Function Receptive Field Natural Image Natural Scene Symmetric Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blackmore, C. and Van-Sluythers, R. R. (1975). Innate and environmental factors in the development of the kittens visual cortex. J. Physiol., 248:663–716.Google Scholar
  2. Field, D. J. (1987). Ralations between the statistics of natural images and the response properities of cortical cells. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 4(12):2379–2394.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hebb, D. O. (1949). The Organization of Behavior. Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Imbert, M. and Buisseret, P. (1975). Receptive field charectaristics and plastic properties of visual cortical cells in kittens reared with or without visual experiance. Exp. Brain Res., 22:25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Linsker, R. (1986). From basic network principles to neural architecture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 83:7508–12, 8390–4, 8779–83.Google Scholar
  6. Liu, Y. and Shouval, H. (1994). Localized principal components of natural images - an analytic solution. Network., 5.2.Google Scholar
  7. Miller, K. D. (1994). A model for the development of simple cell receptive fields and the ordered arrangement of orientation columns throgh activity-dependent competition between on-and off -center inputs. J. of Neurosci., 14.Google Scholar
  8. Oja, E. (1982). A simplefied neuron model as a principle component analyzer. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 15:267–273.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sanger, T. D. (1989). Optimal unsupervised learning in a single-layer linear feedforward neural network. Neural Networks, 2:459–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. von der Malsburg, C. (1973). Self-organization of orientation sensitive cells in striata cortex. Kybernetik, 14:85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harel Shouval
    • 1
  • Yong Liu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physics and Institute for Brain and Neural SystemsBrown University ProvidenceUSA

Personalised recommendations