Appropriateness as a measure of the cognitive-contextual aspects of food acceptance

  • H. G. Schutz

Abstract

Throughout the history of the scientific measurement of food acceptance, there has been a growing recognition that the use of preference alone, in the sense of pure affective judgement, is an insufficient measure as an explanatory variable for food choice. As evidenced by the data on the prediction of food consumption behavior illustrated by the work of (Kamenetzky et al. 1957), (Lau et al. 1979), (Pilgrim and Kamen 1963 ), (Sidel et al. 1972), the prediction of food consumption behavior from preference judgments at best accounts for only about 50% of the variance in consumption. The relevance of cognitive processes in food acceptance has been considered by (Olson 1981), (Thomson and McEwan 1988), (Rappaport & Peters 1980), (Worsley 1963). The consumer and market research community have also recognized the importance of so-called situational variables in understanding consumer behavior an indicated in the paper by (Belk 1975), and in particular usage conditions as represented by (Kakkar and Lutz 1981) and a pioneering work by (Stefflre 1971). The use of Kelly’s personal construct theory (1955) and repertory grid, illustrated by the work of (McEwan and Thomson 1963) as one approach for evaluating the contextual aspects of food acceptance.

Keywords

Income Marketing Hunt Kelly Prep 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baird, P.R. and Schutz, H.G. (1976) The marketing concept applied to ‘selling’ good nutrition. Journal of Nutrition Education, 8(1), 13–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belk, R.W. (1975) Situational variables and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 2, December, p. 158.Google Scholar
  3. Bruhn, C.M. and Schutz, H.G. (1986) Consumer perceptions of dairy and related-use foods. Food Technology, 40(1), 79–85.Google Scholar
  4. Gower, J.C. (1975) Generalised Procrustes analysis. Psychometrika, 40, 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kamenetzky, J., Pilgrim, F.J., and Schutz, H.G. (1957) Relationship of consumption to preference under different field conditions. Quartermaster Food and Container Interim Report, December.Google Scholar
  6. Kakkar, P. and Lutz, R.J. (1981) Situational influence on consumer behavior: a review, in H.H. Kassarjiian and T.S. Robertson (eds) Perspectives in Consumer Behavior, 3rd edn, Scott Foresman, Glenview, IL, pp. 204–14.Google Scholar
  7. Kelly, G.A. (1955) The Psychology of Personal Constructs, Vol. 1., Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Lau, D., Hanada, L., Kaminskyj, O., and Krondl, M. (1979) Predicting food use by measuring attitudes and preference. Food Product Development, 13, 66–72.Google Scholar
  9. Martens, M., Schutz, H.G., Risvik, E., and Rodbotten, M. (1988) Consumer perceptions of nutritional value related to other quality attributes and to chemical components, in J. Solms, D.R. Booth, R.M. Pangborn, and O. Raundhardt (eds) Food Acceptance and Nutrition, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  10. McEwan, J.A. and Thomson, D.M.H. (1988) An investigation of the factors influencing consumer acceptance of chocolate confectionery using the repertory grid method, in D.M.H Thomson (ed) Food Acceptability, Elsevier Applied Science, London, pp. 347–62.Google Scholar
  11. Miller, K.E. and Ginter, J.L. (1979) An investigation of situational variation in brand choice behavior and attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, February, pp. 111–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Olson, J.C. (1981) The importance of cognitive processes and existing knowledge structures for understanding food acceptance, in J. Solms and R.C. Hall (eds) Criteria of Food Acceptance, Forster Verlag, Zurich, pp. 69–81.Google Scholar
  13. Pilgrim, F.J. and Kamen, J.M. (1963) Predictors of human food consumption. Science, 139, 501–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rappaport, L. and Peters, G.R. (1988) Aging and the psychosocial problematics of food. American Behavioral Scientist, 32, 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Resurreccion, A.V.A. (1986) Consumer use patterns for fresh and processed vegetable products. Journal of Consumer Studies and Home Economics, 10, 317–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rucker, M.H. and Schutz, H.G. (1982) Development of consumer typologies from appro-priateness ratings. Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science, 5, 587.Google Scholar
  17. Rummel, R.J. (1970) Applied Factor Analysis. Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL, p. 500.Google Scholar
  18. Schutz, H.G. and Ortega, J.H. (1974) Consumer attitudes toward wine. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 25, 33–8.Google Scholar
  19. Schutz, H.G. and Rucker, M.H. (1975) A comparison of variable configurations across scale lengths: an empirical study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 35, 319–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schutz, H.G., Rucker, M.H., and Hunt, J.D. (1971) Hospital patients’ and employees’ reactions to food-use combinations. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 60, 207–12.Google Scholar
  21. Schutz, H.G., Fridgen, J.D., and Damrell, J.D. (1975a) Consumer perceptions of rice and related products. Journal of Food Science, 40, 277–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schutz, H.G., Rucker, M.H., and Russell, G.F. (1975b) Food and food use classification systems. Food Technology, 29, 50–64.Google Scholar
  23. Schutz, H.G., Moore, S.M., and Rucker, M.H. (1977) Predicting food purchase and use by multivariate attitudinal analysis. Food Technology, 31, 85–92.Google Scholar
  24. Schutz, H.G. (1988) Beyond preference: appropriateness as a measure of contextual evaluation of food, in D.M.H. Thomson (ed.) Food Acceptability, Elsevier Applied Science, London, pp. 115–34.Google Scholar
  25. Sidel, J.L., Stone, H., Wollsey, A., and Macredy, J.M. (1972) Correlation between hedonic ratings and consumption of beer. Journal of Food Science, 37, 335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stefflre, V. (1971) Some eliciting and computational procedures for descriptive semantics, in P. Kay, P. Reich, and M. McClaran (eds) Explorations in Mathematical Anthropology, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 211–48.Google Scholar
  27. Thomson, D.M.H. and McEwan, J.A. (1988) An application of the repertory grid method to investigate consumer perceptions of foods. Appetite, 10, 181–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wind, Y. (1977) Toward a change in the focus of marketing analysis: from a single brand to an assortment. Journal of Marketing, 41, October, pp. 12, 143.Google Scholar
  29. Worsley, A. (1980) Thought for food: investigations of cognitive aspects of food. Ecology of Food and Nutrition, 9, 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. G. Schutz

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations