Advertisement

Recent Developments in the Physiology of the Mammalian Muscle Spindle

  • U. Proske

Summary

Experiments have been carried out on passive muscle spindles of the soleus muscle of anaesthetised cats. Use is made of the property of spindles to show after-effects. It is proposed that after a muscle stretch the intrafusal fibres of spindles fall slack, due to their thixotropic property. It is possible to take up the slack selectively in individual intrafusal fibres by stimulating their fusimotor (γ) fibres. It was shown that vibration sensitivity of a slack spindle could be restored after a period of stimulation of γ static (γs) but not γ dynamic (γD) axons. Similarly the level of resting discharge of the slack spindle could be significantly raised, as could the response to a slow stretch, by stimulating γS but not γD axons. It is concluded that, at muscle lengths at which spindles show after-effects, responses of passive spindles come from the terminals of the afferent fibre which lie on intrafusal fibres innervated by γS axons, the bag2 fibre and perhaps also chain fibres but not the bag1 fibre, innervated by γD axons. This conclusion remains to be reconciled with recent observations which suggest that the sensory region of the bag1 fibre is more compliant than that of bag2 and chain fibres.

Keywords

Muscle Spindle Muscle Length Sensory Ending Intrafusal Fibre Afferent Response 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Banks, R.W., Barker, D. & Stacey, M.J. (1982). Form and distribution of sensory terminals in cat hindlimb muscle spindles. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 299, 329–364.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Celichowski, J., Emonet-Dénand, F., Laporte, Y. & Petit, J. (1994). Distribution of static γ axons in cat peroneus tertius spindles determined by exclusively physiological criteria. Journal of Neurophysiology 72, 722–732.Google Scholar
  3. Chua, M. & Hunt, C.C. (1993). Relative compliance of bag1 and bag2 sensory regions of the cat muscle spindle. 32nd Internalional Congress of Physiological Sciences, Glasgow, 322, 1P.Google Scholar
  4. Gioux, M., Petit, J. & Proske, U. (1991). Responses of cat muscle spindles which lack a dynamic fusimotor supply. Journal of Physiology 432, 557–571.Google Scholar
  5. Gregory, J.E., Morgan, D.L. & Proske, U. (1986). After-effects in the responses of cat muscle spindles. Journal of Neurophysiology 56, 451–461.Google Scholar
  6. Gregory, J.E., Morgan, D.L. & Proske, U. (1988). Responses of muscle spindles depend on their history of activation and movement. In: “Transduction and cellular mechanisms in sensory receptors”. Progress in Brain Research eds. W. Hamann & A. Iggo, 74, 85–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Morgan, D.L., Prochazka, A. & Proske, U. (1984). The after-effects of stretch and fusimotor stimulation on the responses of primary endings of cat muscle spindles. Journal of Physiology 356, 465–477.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Milburn, A. (1984). Stages in development of cat muscle spindles. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology 82, 177–216.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Morgan, D.L., Proske, U. & Gregory, J.E. (1991). Responses of primary endings of cat muscle spindles to locally applied vibration. Experimental Brain Research 87, 530–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Price, R.F. & Dutia, M.B. (1987). Properties of cat neck muscle spindles and their excitation by succinylcholine. Experimental Brain Research 68, 619–630.Google Scholar
  11. Price, R.F. & Dutia, M.B. (1989). Physiological properties of tandem muscle spindles in neck and hind-limb muscles. Progress in Brain Research eds. J.H.J. Allum & M. Hulliger 80, 47–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Prochazka, A. (1989). Sensorimotor gain control: A basic strategy of motor systems? Progress in Neurobiology 33, 281–307.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Proske, U., Gregory, J.E. & Morgan, D.L. (1991). Where in the muscle spindle is the resting discharge generated? Experimental Physiology 76, 777–785.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Proske, U., Morgan, D.L. & Gregory, J.E. (1993). Thixotropy in skeletal muscle and in muscle spindles: A review. Progress in Neurobiology 41, 705–721.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Scott, J.J.A. (1991). Responses of Ia afferent axons from muscle spindles lacking a bag1 intrafusal muscle fibre. Brain Research 543, 97–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Vallbo, Å, B. (1974). Human muscle spindle discharge during isometric voluntary contraction. Amplitude reactions between spindle frequency and torque. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica 90, 319–336.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • U. Proske
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysiologyMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations