On the Use of the General Purpose Code Ansys to Solve Electric and Magnetic Coupled Problems Under Nonlinear Conditions

  • A. Geri
  • M. La Rosa
  • G. M. Veca


This work describes a field-circuit method to solve non-linear massive conductor systems with a coupled method. The approach developed by authors has been studied in such a manner to permit industrial designers to front most common problems, involving saturable massive conductor lines, without using specialised numeric codes. In order to verify the capability of the power grid to supply non-linear devices (e.g., a spot-welding machine), having characteristics rapidly and greatly variable in time, we have developed a numerical method to evaluate the effects due both to transverse electric and magnetic fields in the network multiphase lines. We have approached this problem defining an equivalent circuit for saturable lines. All parameters have been fixed by means of a 2D finite element analysis (FEA). The coupled problem is solved by means of an iterative procedure, where general purpose FEA code and network solvers can be used. In this very simple form the model is able to simulate short lines, where propagation effects can be neglected without problems. For more complex situations, the line can be divided in short tracts and everyone of these can be represented using this model.


Voltage Gradient ANSYS Code ANSYS Parametric Design Language Finite Element Analysis Code Finite Element Analysis Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    A. Konrad, Integrodifferential finite element formulation of two-dimensional steady state skin effect problems, IEEE Trans. Mag., Vol. MAG-18, NO. 1, 284 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.R. Brauer, Finite element calculation of eddy currents and skin effects, IEEE Trans. Mag., Vol. MAG-18, NO. 2, 504 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    T.H. Fawzi, P.E. Burke and T.C.H. Lau, BIE analysis of eddy current losses in rectangular busbars in nonuniform fields, IEEE Trans. Mag., Vol. MAG-18, NO. 6, 1061 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Belforte, M. Chiampi and M. Tartaglia, Fem analysis and modelling of busbar systems under ac conditions, IEEE Trans. Mag., Vol. MAG-21, NO. 6, 2284 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    I.A. Tsukerman, A. Konrad, G. Meunier and J.C. Sabonnadière, Coupled field-circuit problems: trends and accomplishments, IEEE Trans. Mag., Vol. 29, NO. 2, 1701 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Lombard and G. Meunier, A general purpose method for electric and magnetic combined problems for 2D, axisymmetric and transient systems, IEEE Trans. Mag., Vol. 29, NO. 2, 1737 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    ANSYS, User’s manual, Revision 4.4a, Swanson Analysis System, Inc.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leon. O. Chua and Pen_men Lin. “Computer-aided analysis of electronic circuits,” PRENTICEHALL, INC., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1975).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Geri, M. La Rosa and G.M. Veca, Modelling and analysis of electric and magnetic coupled problems under non-linear conditions, in press on J. App. Phys., April, (1994).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Geri
    • 1
  • M. La Rosa
    • 1
  • G. M. Veca
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Ingegneria ElettricaUniversità degli Studi di Roma “La Sapienza”RomaItaly

Personalised recommendations