Conceptual Change for Teachers and Researchers

  • M. Vicentini


From the substantial body of research on students’ understanding of scientific concepts (Pfundt, 1990) we now know something about the ideas that students bring to the classrooms prior to instruction and also about the ideas that students bring with themselves after instruction. Indeed sometimes the students do not change substantially from their common-sense schemes (which are then defined as “resistant to change”). Students may also use common sense schemes, the scientific ones or an hybrid of them, according to the kind and context of the questions they are beeing asked.


Conceptual Change Conceptual Scheme Newtonian Mechanic Philosophical Perspective Disciplinary Knowledge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arons, A., 1990, “Achieving a wider scientific literacy”, in A Guide to introductory physics teaching, Wiley, New York, 288–312.Google Scholar
  2. Clement, J., Brown, D. and Zietsman, A., 1989, “Not all preconceptions are misconceptions: finding “anchoring conception” for grounding on students intuitions”, Int. J. Sci. Educ., 11, 554–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dupré, F., Noce, G. and Vicentini Missoni, M., 1984, “Die Gestalt der Erde und die Schwerkraft”, Physica Didactica, 11, 3–22.Google Scholar
  4. Hermann, F., 1993, Der Karlsruher Physikkurs, Karlsruhe UniversitatGoogle Scholar
  5. Hestenes, D., 1992, “Modeling games in the Newtonian World”, Am. J. Phys., 60, 732–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hewson, P. and Thornley, R., 1989, “The conditions for conceptual change in the classroom”, Int. J. Sci. Educ., 11,541–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Nussbaum, J., 1989, “Classroom conceptual change: philosophical perspectives”, Int. J. Sci. Educ., 11, 530–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Pfundt, H. and Duit, R., 1991, Students ’ alternative frameworks and Science Education, A bibliography, IPN, KielGoogle Scholar
  9. Resnick, L. and Chi, 1988, “Cognitive psychology and Science learning”, in Science for the fun of it: A guide to informal science learning, M. Dudger (ed), Nat. Science Teacher Association, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  10. Vicentini, M. and Wanderlingh, F., 1994, “Generalized kinematics, reversibily and response function”, preprint.Google Scholar
  11. Vicentini, M., 1994, “Thinking Physics for teaching”, in Proceedings of the Summer School of Research in Science Education, Thessaloniki, to be published.Google Scholar
  12. White, R. T. and Gunstone, R. F., 1989, “Metalearning and conceptual change”, Int. J. Sci. Educ., 11, 577–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Vicentini
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratorio di Didattica delle ScienzeUniversity of Rome “La Sapienza”RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations