Paternal Occupation and Birth Defects
The etiology of many birth defects among humans is not well understood, with most of the epidemiologic and laboratory research focusing on maternal factors. It has been stated that approximately 60% of all human birth defects have no known cause (Kalter and Warkany, 1983). The potential role of paternal exposures has not been extensively investigated. This has been due, in part, to the prevailing view that male-mediated developmental effects are unlikely (Brown, 1985). However, recent laboratory and epidemiologic investigations have reinforced earlier animal data suggesting that paternal exposures may be more important than previously suspected. The published literature on paternal occupational exposures and the risk of birth defects in offspring will be reviewed in this chapter.
KeywordsDown Syndrome Spina Bifida Neural Tube Defect Birth Certificate Relative Risk Estimate
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Erickson, J.D., Cochran, W.M., Andersen, C.E., 1979, Parental occupation and birth defects, a preliminary report. Contrib. Epidemiol. Biostat. 1:107–17.Google Scholar
- McDowall, M.E., 1985, Occupational reproductive epidemiology. Series SMPS 50. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
- Olsen, J., 1982, Risk of exposure to teratogens amongst laboratory staff and painters. Dan. Med. Bull. 30:24–8.Google Scholar
- OPCS Monitor., 1982, Congenital malformations and parents’ occupation. MB 3 82/1. Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, London.Google Scholar
- Papier, C.M., 1985, Parental occupation and congenital malformations in a series of 35,000 births in Israel. In: “Prevention of physical and mental congenital defects, Part B: Epidemiology, early detection and therapy, and environmental factors.” ed. M. Marois, pp 291–4, Alan Liss, Inc, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Rothman, K.J., 1986, Modern Epidemiology. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. 358 pp.Google Scholar