Beyond Potential Dominated Inflation

  • Katherine Freese
  • Janna Levin


A year and a half ago we4 proposed a solution to the horizon and monopole problems that differed from many models of inflation in that it does not involve potential domination. Instead, we proposed that a cosmology with a dynamical Planck mass might resolve these problems.

Recently Brustein and Veneziano13 studied superstring inspired Lagrangians and found that the type of behavior required may be found in these models. As there is renewed interest in this subject, we wish to review some of the things we found. For instance, we discuss the horizon, flatness, and monopole problems in this non-potential dominated approach below.

The basic idea of our work was to attempt to use the behavior of gravity alone, without a potential, to solve the horizon and monopole problems of the standard Hot Big Bang cosmology. Here we discuss some of the problems we initially encountered and proposals we made to move beyond them.


Entropy Production Einstein Gravity Causality Condition Planck Mass Scalar Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    A. H. Guth, Phys. Rev. D 23, 347 (1981).ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    J. J. Levin and K. Freese, Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, Phys. Rev. D 15,2738 (1977).MathSciNetADSGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    C. Brans and C. H. Dicke, Phys. Rev. 24, 925 (1961).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Y. Hu, M. Turner, and E. Weinberg preprint also addresses some of these points, although we do not agree with their conclusions.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    A. D. Linde, Phys. Lett. 201 B,437 (1988); A. D. Linde, Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology. (New York: Hardwood Academic Publishers) (1990).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    A. Zee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 703 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    K. Freese, F. Adams, J. Frieman, and E. Mottola, Nucl. Phys. 287, 797 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    A. D. Linde, Particle Physics and Inflationary Cosmology. (New York: Hardwood Academic Publishers) (1990); J. D. Barrow and A. Ottewill, J. Phys. A16, 2757 (1983); A. A. Starobinsky, Soy. Astron. Lett. 9, 302 (1983).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    R. Brandenberger, V. Mukhanov, and A. Sornborger, preprint 1993.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Note, e.g., that a large number of relativistic degrees of freedom early on, g*(tpl)/g*(t0) ≫ 1, could explain the large entropy of the universe. E.g., one could imagine substructure of the fundamental particles as we know them now.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    P.D. Mannheim, Ap. J. 391, 429 (1992).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    R. Brustein and G. Veneziano, preprint CERN-TH 7179/94.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katherine Freese
    • 1
  • Janna Levin
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Physics DepartmentUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Physics DepartmentMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeEngland
  3. 3.CITATorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations