Abstract
In each court, descriptive research and group discussions led to the next, more difficult step of trying to devise decision guidelines helpful in establishing an overall policy and as a day-to-day decisionmaking tool. Defining the task in general terms was straightforward: The goal was to devise a decisionmaking aid that would incorporate the particular court’s policy aims, that would bring together key pieces of information relating to defendants and to their cases, and that would point to preferred decisions for usual kinds of cases. Arriving at a specific product for each of the three court systems, however, meant addressing a number of important policy and practical questions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See Gottfredson (1987).
Parameter estimates from logit analysis were divided by a constant and were rounded to form “points” for scoring defendants.
See Gottfredson et al. (1978); Gottfredson and Gottfredson (1986); Gottfredson and Gottfredson (1988).
See Foote (1954).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Goldkamp, J.S., Gottfredson, M.R., Jones, P.R., Weiland, D. (1995). Consideration of Alternative Decisionmaking Models. In: Personal Liberty and Community Safety. The Plenum Series in Crime and Justice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1821-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1821-1_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5736-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1821-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive