Skip to main content

Experimental Evaluation of Theoretically Ideal Drawing Dies

  • Conference paper
Metal Forming: Interrelation Between Theory and Practice

Abstract

On the basis of plasticity theory, Richmond et al. [l, 2, 3] have derived strip and wire drawing die profiles which require minimum work and result in minimum tensile stresses and strains during a given reduction. The fact that these ‘ideal’ dies do give a minimum tensile stress and strain suggests that they also may give least structural damage. To test this possibility, stainless steel strip and wire were drawn through dies of various contours and the structural damage was evaluated in terms of density decrements. Drawing work efficiencies and tensile properties of the drawn material also were evaluated. The drawings consisted of 50% single reductions of annealed 410 stainless steel 0.375 in. (0.952 cm) strip using nine dies, and 65% two pass reductions of annealed 305 and cold worked 416 stainless steel 0.250 in. (0.635 cm) diameter wires using five dies.

With few exceptions, the ideal dies produced less density decrement and had greater drawing work efficiencies than the other dies. These improvements were large where the die profiles differed most from the ideal profiles, but they were small for linear approximations of the ideal profiles. A convex circular arc profile (similar to rolling) gave the largest density decrement and least work efficiency for the 410 strip. For wire, the greatest decrement occurred at large angles whereas the least efficiency occurred at small angles, the optimum angle for least decrement being smaller than that for the least work. The drawn wire showed a weak correlation of increasing tensile elongation with decreasing density decrement. This small effect may indicate the existence of greater effects in fatigue properties (not tested). The zero entrance angle condition of ideal dies was found to be significant, and it is suggested that the exit should also be smooth and have a zero angle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. O. Richmond and M. L. Devenpeck: Proc. 4th U.S, Natl. Congr. Appl. Mechs., 1962, pp. 1053-1057.

    Google Scholar 

  2. O. Richmond: Mechanics of the Solid State, pp. 154-167, U. Toronto Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  3. O. Richmond and H. L. Morrison: J. Mechs. Phys. Solids, 1967, vol. 15, pp. 195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M. L. Devenpeck and O. Richmond: J. Eng. Ind. Trans. ASME B, 1965, vol. 87, pp. 425–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. H. C. Rogers: “Structural Damage in Metal-Forming Processes,” Final Report, Contract No. N00019-68-C-0147, Naval Air Systems Command, March 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. C. Rogers and L. F. Coffin, Jr.: “Investigation of the Nature of Structural Damage in Metal-Forming Processes,” Final Report, Contract NOw-66-0546-d, Bureau of Naval Weapons, June 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  7. H. C. Rogers, R. C. Leach, and L. F. Coffin, Jr.: “Investigation of the Nature of Structural Damage in Metal-Forming Processes,” Final Report, Contract NOw-65-0097-f, Bureau of Naval Weapons, Nov. 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. F. Coffin and H. C. Rogers: Trans. Quar. ASM, 1967, vol. 60, pp. 672–687.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. L. Morrison: “Private Communication.”.

    Google Scholar 

  10. F. Garofalo and H. A. Wriedt: Acta Met., 1962, vol. 10, pp. 1007–1012.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. T. Melville: “Private Communication.”.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. T. Yang: J. Eng. Ind. Trans. ASME B, 1961, vol. 83, pp. 523–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. P. Green and R. Hill: J. Mechs. Phys. Solids, 1952, vol. 1, pp. 31–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. R. M. Caddell and A. G. Atkins: J. Eng. Ind. Trans. ASME B, 1969, vol. 91, pp. 664–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1971 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this paper

Cite this paper

Devenpeck, M.L. (1971). Experimental Evaluation of Theoretically Ideal Drawing Dies. In: Hoffmanner, A.L. (eds) Metal Forming: Interrelation Between Theory and Practice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1757-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1757-3_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5708-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1757-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics