Abstract
On the basis of plasticity theory, Richmond et al. [l, 2, 3] have derived strip and wire drawing die profiles which require minimum work and result in minimum tensile stresses and strains during a given reduction. The fact that these ‘ideal’ dies do give a minimum tensile stress and strain suggests that they also may give least structural damage. To test this possibility, stainless steel strip and wire were drawn through dies of various contours and the structural damage was evaluated in terms of density decrements. Drawing work efficiencies and tensile properties of the drawn material also were evaluated. The drawings consisted of 50% single reductions of annealed 410 stainless steel 0.375 in. (0.952 cm) strip using nine dies, and 65% two pass reductions of annealed 305 and cold worked 416 stainless steel 0.250 in. (0.635 cm) diameter wires using five dies.
With few exceptions, the ideal dies produced less density decrement and had greater drawing work efficiencies than the other dies. These improvements were large where the die profiles differed most from the ideal profiles, but they were small for linear approximations of the ideal profiles. A convex circular arc profile (similar to rolling) gave the largest density decrement and least work efficiency for the 410 strip. For wire, the greatest decrement occurred at large angles whereas the least efficiency occurred at small angles, the optimum angle for least decrement being smaller than that for the least work. The drawn wire showed a weak correlation of increasing tensile elongation with decreasing density decrement. This small effect may indicate the existence of greater effects in fatigue properties (not tested). The zero entrance angle condition of ideal dies was found to be significant, and it is suggested that the exit should also be smooth and have a zero angle.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
O. Richmond and M. L. Devenpeck: Proc. 4th U.S, Natl. Congr. Appl. Mechs., 1962, pp. 1053-1057.
O. Richmond: Mechanics of the Solid State, pp. 154-167, U. Toronto Press, 1968.
O. Richmond and H. L. Morrison: J. Mechs. Phys. Solids, 1967, vol. 15, pp. 195–203.
M. L. Devenpeck and O. Richmond: J. Eng. Ind. Trans. ASME B, 1965, vol. 87, pp. 425–428.
H. C. Rogers: “Structural Damage in Metal-Forming Processes,” Final Report, Contract No. N00019-68-C-0147, Naval Air Systems Command, March 1969.
H. C. Rogers and L. F. Coffin, Jr.: “Investigation of the Nature of Structural Damage in Metal-Forming Processes,” Final Report, Contract NOw-66-0546-d, Bureau of Naval Weapons, June 1967.
H. C. Rogers, R. C. Leach, and L. F. Coffin, Jr.: “Investigation of the Nature of Structural Damage in Metal-Forming Processes,” Final Report, Contract NOw-65-0097-f, Bureau of Naval Weapons, Nov. 1965.
L. F. Coffin and H. C. Rogers: Trans. Quar. ASM, 1967, vol. 60, pp. 672–687.
H. L. Morrison: “Private Communication.”.
F. Garofalo and H. A. Wriedt: Acta Met., 1962, vol. 10, pp. 1007–1012.
T. Melville: “Private Communication.”.
C. T. Yang: J. Eng. Ind. Trans. ASME B, 1961, vol. 83, pp. 523–530.
A. P. Green and R. Hill: J. Mechs. Phys. Solids, 1952, vol. 1, pp. 31–36.
R. M. Caddell and A. G. Atkins: J. Eng. Ind. Trans. ASME B, 1969, vol. 91, pp. 664–672.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1971 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this paper
Cite this paper
Devenpeck, M.L. (1971). Experimental Evaluation of Theoretically Ideal Drawing Dies. In: Hoffmanner, A.L. (eds) Metal Forming: Interrelation Between Theory and Practice. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1757-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1757-3_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5708-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1757-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive