Skip to main content

Abstract

The decision to use work teams should be placed in the broader context of the organization’s competitive and manufacturing strategies. The overall premise is that, for work teams to be truly effective within the organization, they must be geared to provide capabilities or outcomes that are valued by the firm as a whole. In other words, teams should add value to the firm’s products and services in ways that are meaningful to the marketplace. This implies an outward-looking view of team design: teams should be empowered to take actions that, either directly or indirectly, support the organization’s sources of competitive advantage.

Depending on its charter and design, manufacturing work teams may provide improvements in operational efficiency, quality, delivery, and flexibility. In turn, the organization may exploit these improvements through either low price or product differentiation strategies.

The use of teams as a way to organize people and conduct work is not a new phenomenon in business. What is new is the dramatic increase in the use of teams and the variety of purposes for which they are used. Teams are becoming pervasive in manufacturing organizations because they provide a variety of benefits (Katzenbach and Smith, 1993). While teams certainly have their place in the modern manufacturing organization, they should not be formed indiscriminately. If not used properly, teams may fail to provide the benefits hoped for and may even be harmful to manufacturing performance (Campion, Medsker and Higgs; 1993).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Banker, R.D., J.M. Field, R.G. Schroeder, and K.K. Sinha (1996). “Impact of Work Teams on Manufacturing Performance.” Academy of Management Journal, 39 (4), 867–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Champion, M.A., G.J. Medsker, and A.C. Higgs (1993). “Relations Between Work Group Characteristics and Effectiveness: Implications for Designing Effective Work Groups.” Personnel Psychology, 46, 823–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S.G., G.E. Ledford, Jr., and G.M. Spreitzer (1996). “A Predictive Model of Managing Work Team Effectiveness.” Human Relations, 49 (5), 643–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunphy, D. and B. Bryant (1996). “Teams: Panaceas or Prescriptions for Improved Performance.” Human Relations, 49 (5), 677–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, P.S., R. Devadas, and T.L.G. Hughson (1988). “Groups and Productivity: Analyzing the Effectiveness of Self-Managing Teams.” In Productivity in Organizations, J.P. Campbell et al. (ed.), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzzo, R.A. and M.W. Dickson (1996). “Teams in Organizations: Recent Research on Performance and Effectiveness.” Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 307–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J.R. (1998). “Why Teams Don’t Work.” In Theory and Research on Small Groups, R.S. Tindale et al. (ed.), Plenum Press, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington-Mackin, D. (1996). Keeping the Team Going: A Tool Kit to Renew & Refuel Your Workplace Teams, AMACOM/American Management Association, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa, I. (1989). Introduction to Quality Control, 3rd edition, 3A Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenbach, J.R. and D.K. Smith (1993). The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-Performance Organization, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E.E. and S.G. Cohen (1992). “Designing pay systems for teams.” American Compensation Association Journal, 1, 6–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohrman, S.A., S.G. Cohen, and A.M. Mohrman, Jr. (1995). Designing Team-Based Organizations: New Forms for Knowledge Work, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary-Kelly, A.M., J.J. Martocchio, and D.D. Frink (1994). “A Review of the Influence of Group Goals on Group Performance.” Academy of Management Journal, 37 (5), 1285–1301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osburn, J.D., L. Moran, E. Musselwhite, and J.H. Zenger (1990). Self-directed Work Teams: The New American Challenge, Irwin Publishing, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McCreery, J.K., Bloom, M.C. (2000). Teams: Design and Implementation. In: Swamidass, P.M. (eds) Innovations in Competitive Manufacturing. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1705-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1705-4_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5687-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1705-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics