Supplier Partnerships as Strategy

  • Brian Leavy

Abstract

The partnership approach to supplier relations is now a very common feature in many industries. This is due in large part to the phenomenal success of the ‘world class manufacturing’ (Schonberger, 1985), and ‘lean production’ crusades (Womack et al., 1990; Womack and Jones, 1994) over the last two decades, which have drawn their inspiration from the proven competitive practices of leading Japanese companies (Dyer and Ouchi, 1993). One of the by-products of this success has been the ever-widening faith in the virtues of supplier partnering

The purpose of this article is to present a strategic perspective on supplier partnering to help companies to more critically assess the opportunities and risks associated with the adoption of the partnering approach. The article begins by contrasting the underlying rationale for supplier partnering with the more traditional arm’s length approach to buyer-supplier relations. Most companies with aspirations to world class manufacturing standards are now adopting the partnering approach. The practices of the following companies are included in this article: Amdahl; Apple; Bennetton; Digital Equipment Corporation; General Motors; Intel; Marks and Spencer; Toyota; Wal-Mart.

Keywords

Microwave Income Expense Stake Harness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dyer, J.H. and W.G. Ouchi (1993). Japanese-style partnerships: giving companies a competitive edge, Sloan Management Review, Fall, 51–63.Google Scholar
  2. Hamel, G. and C.K. Prahalad (1994). Competing for the Future, Boston Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  3. Huey, J. (1989). Wal-Mart, will it take over the world?, Fortune, January 30th, 56–62.Google Scholar
  4. Kirkpatrick, D. (1997). Intel’s amazing profit machine, Fortune, February 17th, 24–30.Google Scholar
  5. Lorenz, A. (1993). Lopez to drive VW on a lean mixture, The Sunday Times, London, March 21st, Section 3, 9.Google Scholar
  6. Lyons, T., A.R. Krachenberg, and J.W. Henke (1990). Mixed motive marriages: What’s next for buyer-supplier relations?, Sloan Management Review, Spring, 29–36.Google Scholar
  7. Mandel, M. (1997). “The new business cycle.” Business Week, March 31st, 48–54.Google Scholar
  8. Montgomery, C. (1991). Marks and Spencer, Ltd. (A), Harvard Business School, Case #9-391-089.Google Scholar
  9. Porter, M.E. (1980). Competitive Strategy, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  10. Quinn, J.B. and F.G. Hilmer (1994). Strategic outsourcing, Sloan Management Review, Summer, 43–55.Google Scholar
  11. Womack, J.P. and D.T. Jones (1994). From lean production to the lean enterprise, Harvard Business Review 72, March–April, 93–103.Google Scholar
  12. Womack, J.P., D.T. Jones, and D. Roos (1990). The Machine that Changed the World, New York: Rawson Associates.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian Leavy
    • 1
  1. 1.Dublin City UniversityDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations