Product Development and Concurrent Engineering

  • Christoph H. Loch
  • Christian Terwiesch

Abstract

Concurrent Engineering (CE) represents a key trend in product development over the last decade. It has changed academic and industrial approaches of looking at the product development process. It can be defined as an integrated “new product development process to allow participants, who make upstream decisions to consider downstream and external requirements.” Central characteristics of a concurrent development process are activity overlapping, information transfer in small batches, and the use of cross-functional teams (Gerwin and Susman, 1996). Some related practices of Toyota are described here.

Keywords

Onaka 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adler, P.S., A. Mandelbaum, V. Nguyen, and E. Schwerer (1995). “From Project to Process Management: An Empirically Based Framework for Analyzing Product Development Time.” Management Science, 41, 458–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, Th.J. (1986). “Organizational Structure, Information Technology, and R&D Productivity.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM 33, 212–217.Google Scholar
  3. Blackburn, J.D. (1991). Time Based Competition, Homewood: Business One Irwin.Google Scholar
  4. Clark, K.B. and T. Fujimoto (1991). Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization and Management in the World Auto Industry. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  5. Eisenhardt, K.M. and B.N. Tabrizi (1995). “Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 84–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eppinger, S.D., D.E. Whitney, R.P. Smith, and DA. Gebala (1994). “A Model-Based Method for Organizing Tasks in Product Development.” Research in Engineering Design, 6, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fitzsimmons, J.A., P. Kouvelis, and D.N. Mallik. “Design Strategy and Its Interface with Manufacturing and Marketing: a Conceptual Framework.” Journal of Operations Management, 10, 398–415.Google Scholar
  8. Gerwin, D. and G. Susman (1996). “Special Issue on Concurrent Engineering.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 43, 118–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gulati, R.K. and S.D. Eppinger (1996). “The Coupling of Product Architecture and Organizational Structure Decisions.” MIT Working Paper 3906.Google Scholar
  10. Ha, A.Y. and E.L. Porteus (1995). “Optimal Timing of Reviews in Concurrent Design for Manufacturability.” Management Science, 41, 1431–1447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hauptman, O. and K.K. Hirji (1996). “The Influence of Process Concurrency on Project Outcomes in Product Development: an Empirical Study with Cross-Functional Teams.” IEEE Transactions in Engineering Management, 43, 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Imai, K., I. Nonaka, and H. Takeuchi (1985). “Managing the New Product Development Process: How the Japanese Companies Learn and Unlearn.” In: Clark, K.B., R.H. Hayes, and C. Lorenz (eds.). The Uneasy Alliance. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.Google Scholar
  13. Jaikumar, R. and R. Bohn (1992). “A Dynamic Approach to Operations Management: An Alternative to Static Optimization.” International Journal of Production Economics.Google Scholar
  14. Krishnan, V, S.D. Eppinger, and D.E. Whitney (1997). “A Model-Based Framework to Overlap Product Development Activities.” Management Science, 43, 437–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liker, J.K., R.R. Kamath, S.N. Wasti, and M. Nagamachi (1995). “Integrating Suppliers into Fast-Cycle Product Development.” In J.K. Liker, J.J.E. Ettlie, and J.C. Campbell (eds.). Engineered in Japan: Japanese Technology Management Practices. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  16. Loch, C.H. and C. Terwiesch (1998). “Communication and Uncertainty in Concurrent Engineering.” Management Science 44, August.Google Scholar
  17. Morelli, MD., S.D. Eppinger, and R.K. Gulati (1995). “Predicting Technical Communication in Product Development Organizations.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 42, 215–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nevins, J.L. and D.E. Whitney (1989). Concurrent Design of Products and Processes. McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  19. Nobeoka, K. and M.A. Cusumano (1995). “Multiproject Strategy, Design Transfer, and Project Performance.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 42, 397–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pisano, G. (1997). The Development Factory. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.Google Scholar
  21. Smith, R. (1997). “The Historical Roots of Concurrent Engineering Fundamentals.” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 44, 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Smith, R.P. and S.D. Eppinger (1997). “Identifying Controlling Features of Engineering Design Iteration.” Management Science, 43, 276–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Steward, D.V. (1981). Systems Analysis and Management: Structure, Strategy and Design. Petrocelli Books, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Takeuchi, H. and I. Nonaka (1986). “The New Product Development Game.” Harvard Business Review, 64, 137–146.Google Scholar
  25. Terwiesch, C, C.H. Loch, and M. Niederkofler (1996). “Managing Uncertainty in Concurrent Engineering.” Proceedings of the 3rd EIASM Conference on Product Development, 693–706.Google Scholar
  26. Terwiesch, C. and CH. Loch (1997). “Management of Overlapping Development Activities: a Framework for Exchanging Preliminary Information.” Proceedings of the 4th EIASM Conference on Product Development, 797–812.Google Scholar
  27. Terwiesch, C and CH. Loch (1998). “Managing the Process of Engineering Change Orders: The Case of the Climate Control System in Automobile Development.” Forthcoming in the Journal of Product Innovation Management.Google Scholar
  28. Thomke, S. (1996). “The Role of Flexibility in the Design of New Products: An Empirical Study.” Harvard Business School Working Paper 96–066.Google Scholar
  29. Ulrich, K. (1995). “The Role of Product Architecture in the Manufacturing Firm.” Research Policy, 24, 419–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ulrich, K. and S.D. Eppinger (1995). Product Design and Development. McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Ward, A., J.K. Liker, J.J. Cristiano, and D.K. Sobek II (1995). “The Second Toyota Paradox: How Delaying Decisions Can Make Better Cars Faster.” Sloan Management Review, Spring, 43–61.Google Scholar
  32. Wheelwright, S.C and K.B. Clark (1992). Revolutionizing Product Development. The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christoph H. Loch
    • 1
  • Christian Terwiesch
    • 2
  1. 1.INSEADFontainebleauFrance
  2. 2.University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations