Skip to main content

Abstract

Substantial capital investments are required for manufacturing almost all goods of economic significance. The productivity of these investments enable companies and nations to compete. The maintenance of capital investments involves significant recurring expenses. For example, in 1991, DuPont s expenditure on company-wide maintenance was roughly equal to its net income. Maintenance expenses vary depending on the type of industry; however, they are typically 15–40% of production costs. Companies attempt to control maintenance costs by keeping them at a specified budget level, a level often based on the previous year’s expenses.

During the last decade, manufacturers found this approach to be insufficient. As companies have invested in programs such as JIT and TQM in an effort to increase organizational capabilities, the benefits from these programs have often been limited by unreliable or inflexible equipment. In the context of JIT & TQM use, rather than being seen simply as an expense that must be controlled, maintenance is now regarded as a strategic competitive tool. Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) has evolved as an effective program for improving equipment performance and increasing organizational capabilities.

TPM has resulted in significant improvements in plant performance. McKone, Schoreder, and Cua (1998) evaluated the impact of TPM practices on manufacturing performance and found that TPM has a positive and significant relationship with low cost (as measured by high inventory turns), high levels of product quality (as measured by higher levels of conformance to specifications), and strong delivery performance (as measured by higher percentage of on-time deliveries and by faster speeds of delivery). Their research indicates that TPM plays a significant role in improving manufacturing performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, M.Q. (1981). “Monotone Optimal Preventative Maintenance Polices For Stochastically Failing Equipment.” Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 28, 347–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bain, L.J. and M. Engelhardt (1991). Statistical Analysis Of Reliability And Life-Testing Models. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chikte, S.D. and S.D. Deshmukh (1981). “Preventive Maintenance And Replacement Under Additive Damage.” Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 28, 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dada, M. and R. Marcellus (1994). “Process Control With Learning.” Operations Research, 42 (2), 323–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, C.H. (1988). “A Quality Control Model With Learning Effects.” Operations Research, 36 (3), 437–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotoh, F. (1991). Equipment Planning For Tpm: Maintenance Prevention Design, Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, E.H. (1992). Successfully Installing Tpm In A Non-Japanese Plant. Tpm Press, Inc., Allison Park, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D.W. and J.J. Mccall (1963). “Optimal Scheduling Of Replacement And Inspection.” Operations Research, 11, 723–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H.L. and M.J. Rosenblatt (1989). “A Production And Maintenance Planning Model With Restoration Cost Dependent On Detection Delay.” IIE Transactions, 21 (4), 368–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcellus, R.L. and M. Dada (1991). “Interactive Process Quality Improvement.” Management Science, 37 (11), 1365–1376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mccall, J.J. (1965). “Maintenance Policies For Stochastically Failing Equipment: A Survey.” Management Science, 11 (5), 493–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKone, K., R. Schroeder, and K. Cua (1999). “Total Productive Maintenance: A Contextual View.” Journal Of Operations Management, 17 (2), 123–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKone, K., R. Schroeder, and K. Cua (1998a). “The Impact Of Total Productive Maintenance Practices On Manufacturing Performance.” Carlson School Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKone, K. and E. Weiss (1997a). “An Autonomous Maintenance Approach To Cycle Time Reduction: Guidelines For Improvement.” Darden School Working Paper Series, Dswp-97-30, University Of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKone, K. and E. Weiss (1997b). “Analysis Of Investments In Autonomous Maintenance Activities,” Carlson School Operations And Management Science Department Working Paper 97-7, University Of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKone, K. and E. Weiss (1999). “Managerial Guidelines For The Use Of Predictive Maintenance.” Darden School Working Paper Series, University Of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nachi-Fujikoshi Corporation (1990). Training For TPM: A Manufacturing Success Story, Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakajima, S. (1988). Introduction To TPM, Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özekici, S. and S.R. Pliska (1991). “Optimal Scheduling Of Inspections: A Delayed Markov Model With False Positive And Negatives.” Operations Research, 39 (2), 261–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paté-Cornell, M.E., H.L. Lee, and G. Tagaras (1987). “Warning Of Malfunction: The Decision To Inspect And Maintain Production Processes On Schedule Or On Demand.” Management Science, 33 (10), 1277–1290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierskalla, WP. and J. A. Voelker (1976). “A Survey Of Maintenance Models: The Control And Surveillance Of Deteriorating Systems,” Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 23, 353–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahim, M.A. (1994). “Joint Determination Of Production Quantity, Inspection Schedule, And Control Chart Design.” IIE Transactions, 26 (6), 2–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schonberger, R.J. (1986). World Class Manufacturing: The Lessons Of Simplicity Applied, Free Press, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimbun, N.K. (Ed.) (1995). Tpm Case Studies, Productivity Press, Portland, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinbacher, H.R. and N.L. Steinbacher (1993). TPM For America: What It Is And Why You Need It, Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamatis, D.H. (1995). Failure Mode And Effect Analysis, ASQC Quality Press, Milwaukee, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, T. (1992). New Directions For Tpm, Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajiri, M. and F. Gotoh (1992). TPM Implementation: A Japanese Approach, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapiero, C.S. (1986). “Continuous Quality Production And Machine Maintenance.” Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 33, 489–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thilander, M. (1992). “Some Observations Of Operation And Maintenance In Two Swedish Firms.” Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 3 (2).

    Google Scholar 

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, G. (1968). “Optimal Maintenance Policy And Sale Date Of A Machine.” Management Science, 14 (9), 543–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsuchiya, S. (1992). Quality Maintenance: Zero Defects Through Equipment Management, Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valdez-Flores, C. and R.M. Feldman (1989). “A Survey Of Preventative Maintenance Models For Stochastically Deteriorating Single-Unit Systems.” Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 36, 419–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varughese, K.K. (1993). “Total Productive Maintenance.” University Of Calgary, A Thesis For The Degree Of Master Of Mechanical Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, K.H. (1983). “Optimal Replacement Under Additive Damage In Randomly Varying Environments.” Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 30, 377–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McKone, K.E., Weiss, E.N. (2000). Total Productive Maintenance (TPM). In: Swamidass, P.M. (eds) Innovations in Competitive Manufacturing. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1705-4_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1705-4_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5687-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1705-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics